The Out of Africa Myth is the supposed
theory that argues that all of Human kind originated from Africa,
that we are all from a single race and that all other differences in
the other races, such as in skin complexion, hair, and development
is just from a different environmental exposure.
The idea that all the races came from
Africa, namely the black sub races are false as we now know that
Satan and the Gods of old created each race from genetic engineering
to embody different characteristics. Science is now showing that the
"Out of Africa" argument is false, from DNA testing on Modern humans
and from ancient human remains and fossil findings.
There have been many attempts by the enemy (via their mainstream
media outlet) to try to remove the concept and fact of Race. If the
enemy can convince the people of the world that there is no such
thing as race, and that we are all the same then it would serve as a
gateway for everyone to race mix and forget about their ancestry and
racial traits- i.e nothing to preserve or save...
Race is a beautiful thing and is from Satan and the Daemon gods.
Despite the attempt at making up lies such as the out of Africa
myth, people are still not willing to race mix and abandon the
natural human reaction, which is to be with, choose and support
their own kind. This is all natural.
More information on the Out of Africa Myth, which reveals information
that all the human races on earth are different and separate but come
from a common source (Satan and the other Extra-terrestrial Daemon
Gods)--not to mention that many tribes and ancient texts state the
separate human creations by the Gods:
http://atlanteangardens.blogspot.ca/201
Scientific evidence refuting the theory of modern humanity’s
African genesis is common knowledge among those familiar with the
most recent scientific papers on the human Genome, Mitochondrial DNA
and Y-chromosomes. Regrettably, within mainstream press and academia
circles, there seems to be a conspicuous – and dare we say it –
deliberate vacuum when it comes to reporting news of these recent
studies and their obvious implications.
Australian historian Greg Jefferys explains that, "The whole
‘Out of Africa’ myth has its roots in the mainstream academic
campaign in the 1990′s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my
degree they all spent a lot of time on the ‘Out of Africa’ thing but
it’s been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on
to it."
It did begin the early 90’s. And the academics most responsible
for cementing both the Out-of Africa theory and the complementary
common ancestral African mother – given the name of “Eve” – in the
public arena and nearly every curriculum, were Professors Alan C.
Wilson and Rebecca L. Cann.
In their defense, the authors of this paper were fully aware
that genealogy is not in any way linked to geography, and that their
placement of Eve in Africa was an assumption, never an assertion.
A very recent paper on Y-chromosomes published in 2012,
(Re-Examing the “Out of Africa” Theory and the Origin of Europeoids
(Caucasians) in the Light of DNA Genealogy written by Anatole A.
Klyosov and Igor L. Rozhanski) only confirms the denial of any
African ancestry in non-Africans, and strongly supports the
existence of a “common ancestor” who “would not necessarily be in
Africa. In fact, it was never proven that he lived in Africa.”
Central to results of this extensive examination of haplogroups
(7,556) was the absence of any African genes. So lacking was the
sampling of African genetic involvement, the researchers stated in
their introduction that, “the finding that the Europeoid haplogroups
did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by
the fact that bearers of the Europeoid, as well as all non-African
groups do not carry either SNI’s M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114,
P262”.
With the haplogroups not present in any African genes and an
absence of dozens of African genetic markers, it is very difficult
nigh on impossible to sustain any link to Africa. The researchers
are adamant that their extensive study “offers evidence to
re-examine the validity of the Out-of-Africa concept”.
They see no genetic proof substantiating an African precedence
in the Homo sapien tree, and maintain that “a more plausible
interpretation might have been that both current Africans and
non-Africans descended separately from a more ancient common
ancestor, thus forming a proverbial fork”.
We regard the claim of “a more plausible explanation” as a gross
understatement, since there is absolutely nothing plausibly African
turning up in any test tubes. In fact, the researchers made note of
their repeated absence stating “not one non-African participant out
of more than 400 individuals in the Project tested positive to any
of thirteen ‘African’ sub-clades of haplogroup A”. The only
remaining uncertainty relates to the identity of this “more ancient
common ancestor”. All that can be stated with confidence is that
humanity’s ancestor did not reside in Africa.
Unfounded accusations of racism have become common as the
prevailing Afrocentric hypothesis is constantly being challenged by
the growing mountain of conflicting scientific evidence, especially
in the evolving field of genetics.
It is now scientifically irrefutable fact that the "human
species" has been found to contain a substantial quantity of DNA (at
least 20%) from other hominid populations not classified as Homo
sapien; such as Neanderthal, Denisovan, African archaic, Homo
erectus, and now possibly even "Hobbit" (Homo floresiensis).
If not given drugs to prevent infant death, the pregnant body of
a rhesus negative mother will attack, try to reject, and even kill
her own offspring if it is by a rhesus positive man.
The Domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) is a sub-species of
the gray wolf (Canis lupus), and they produce hybrids.
There are numerous other examples of where two separate species
(for example with different numbers of chromosomes) can also produce
viable offspring, yet are considered separate species. That said,
humanity has been shown to be, genetically speaking, a hybrid
species that did not all share the same hunter-gatherer ancestry in
Africa.
Recent sequencing of ancient genomes suggests that interbreeding
went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups
more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet unknown human
ancestor. "there were many hominid populations,” says Mark Thomas,
evolutionary geneticist at University College London.
Recent genetic studies are touting shocking headlines about how
ancient humans 'rampantly interbred' and indulged in inter-species
interracial sex with multiple mystery sub-races in a "Lord Of The
Rings"-style world of different creatures, including mystery DNA -
neither human nor Neanderthal, not yet identified.
Hail Satan!
Back to The Black Race
Home Page