mirror of
https://github.com/imapsync/imapsync.git
synced 2024-11-17 00:02:29 +01:00
67 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
67 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
#!/bin/cat
|
|
$Id: FAQ.Old_Style_Web_Design.txt,v 1.9 2020/12/02 21:38:13 gilles Exp gilles $
|
|
|
|
This document is also available online at
|
|
https://imapsync.lamiral.info/FAQ.d/
|
|
https://imapsync.lamiral.info/FAQ.d/FAQ.Old_Style_Web_Design.txt
|
|
|
|
=======================================================================
|
|
Imapsync and its ugly website style
|
|
=======================================================================
|
|
|
|
=======================================================================
|
|
Q. Why the imapsync website looks so old fashion?
|
|
|
|
R. Once in a while I receive messages from people complaining about
|
|
the website style, not that much about the content by the way,
|
|
as people don't read.
|
|
|
|
I know the imapsync website has a grandmother style,
|
|
I'm not offended by complaints about it.
|
|
|
|
Here are several reasons it stays like that for now:
|
|
|
|
* I like to do things myself
|
|
|
|
* I am lazy
|
|
|
|
* I like static web.
|
|
Although you could argue that I do use some dynamic things, like SSI.
|
|
That's true, I use Server Side Include, aka SSI, denoted by the ".shtml"
|
|
extention of some files, instead of the classical ".html" extention.
|
|
It's because I like dynamic web when the dynamic brings something that
|
|
can't be done easily with static files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* I'm proud to be w3c compliant
|
|
https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fimapsync.lamiral.info
|
|
Very very few sites are w3c compliant, it's because nearly all CMS frameworks aren't.
|
|
Only true crazy people are w3c compliant seekers. I'm one of them.
|
|
If you know a CMS w3c compliant, tell me, it will be such a crazy news.
|
|
If you know any web site w3c compliant, tell me, it will be crazy news as well.
|
|
Update: https://contao.org/ is a CMS and it is w3c compliant! This is astonishing!
|
|
(Thanks to Markus Rupprecht for this crazy input!)
|
|
|
|
* I prefer to spend more time on the product itself than the showcase
|
|
|
|
* The product is a command line, a fancy website to sell a command line
|
|
makes more disappointed buyers
|
|
|
|
I agree I could do some sort of A/B experiment and see whether during
|
|
a month I sell more imapsync on a brand new style B site than
|
|
the current A one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Besides, don't misunderstand buyers. The surprising thing about complainers
|
|
is that all are web designers, none of them is a user not in the webdesign branch.
|
|
|
|
I even received some phone call from a buyer saying: "I saw your website
|
|
and I told to myself: this can't be a fake one, the product must be a good one".
|
|
|
|
Another folk like me:
|
|
http://keyhut.com/pos.htm
|
|
(well, not w3c compliant, he is not that mad)
|
|
|
|
So maybe one day...
|
|
|