1
0
mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git synced 2024-10-06 09:37:12 +02:00

fleshing out

This commit is contained in:
gorhill 2014-06-26 12:48:32 -04:00
parent 432f58f96c
commit 6f19300dd8

View File

@ -4,15 +4,19 @@ See [Change log](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Change-log) for latest c
An efficient blocker for Chromium-based browsers. Fast and lean. An efficient blocker for Chromium-based browsers. Fast and lean.
Chromium on Linux 64-bit: <p align="center">
![screenshot](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/ss-chromium-2.png) Chromium on Linux 64-bit<br>
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/ss-chromium-2.png" />
</p>
Opera 22 on Windows 7 32-bit: <p align="center">
![screenshot](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/ss-opera-1.png) Opera 22 on Windows 7 32-bit<br>
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/ss-opera-1.png" />
</p>
<sup>The above screenshots were taken after running my <sup>The above screenshots were taken after visiting many
[reference benchmark](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/Comparative-benchmarks-against-widely-used-blockers:-Top-15-Most-Popular-News-Websites) [reference benchmark](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/Comparative-benchmarks-against-widely-used-blockers:-Top-15-Most-Popular-News-Websites)
plus a bit of random browsing. All blockers were active at the same time, links plus a bit of random browsing. All blockers were active at the same time,
thus they had to deal with exactly the same workload. Before the screenshot was thus they had to deal with exactly the same workload. Before the screenshot was
taken, I left the browser idle for many minutes so as to let the browser's taken, I left the browser idle for many minutes so as to let the browser's
garbage collector kicks in.</sup> garbage collector kicks in.</sup>
@ -33,6 +37,8 @@ memory of ABP.
[infamous vim test](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/Adblock-Plus-memory-consumption), [infamous vim test](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/Adblock-Plus-memory-consumption),
once with only ABP as the active extension, and once with only µBlock as the active extension. (Other once with only ABP as the active extension, and once with only µBlock as the active extension. (Other
extensions may also add their own memory footprint.) extensions may also add their own memory footprint.)
- "It consumes less memory because it doesn't block as well"
- Actually it blocks more efficiently. See [_benchmark_](#benchmarks) below.
#### Regarding reviews in various web store #### Regarding reviews in various web store