From c499ce82a91c3fb673e86c548d86ff021cc8b4fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raymond Hill <rhill@raymondhill.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:45:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Use `Reflect.construct(t)` rather than `new t()`

Using `new` seemed to work but it's maybe
semantically better to use `Reflect.construct`.
---
 assets/resources/scriptlets.js | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/assets/resources/scriptlets.js b/assets/resources/scriptlets.js
index cbd9b9fd1..c4207507c 100644
--- a/assets/resources/scriptlets.js
+++ b/assets/resources/scriptlets.js
@@ -605,9 +605,9 @@ const uBOSafe = new Map();  // jshint ignore: line
             apply: function(target, thisArg, args) {
                 if ( isGoodConfig(target, args[1]) === false ) {
                     log(args[1]);
-                    return target.apply(thisArg, args.slice(0, 1));
+                    return Reflect.apply(target, thisArg, args.slice(0, 1));
                 }
-                return target.apply(thisArg, args);
+                return Reflect.apply(target, thisArg, args);
             },
         });
     window[rtcName] =
@@ -615,9 +615,9 @@ const uBOSafe = new Map();  // jshint ignore: line
             construct: function(target, args) {
                 if ( isGoodConfig(target, args[0]) === false ) {
                     log(args[0]);
-                    return new target();
+                    return Reflect.construct(target);
                 }
-                return new target(...args);
+                return Reflect.construct(target, args);
             }
         });
 })();