***
New procedural cosmetic operator: `:remove()`
Related issue:
- https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/2252
The purpose is to outright remove elements from the
DOM tree. Since `:remove()` is an "action" operator,
it must only be used as a trailing operator (just
like the `:style()` operator).
AdGuard's cosmetic filter syntax `{ remove: true; }`
will be converted to uBO's `:remove()` operator
internally.
***
New procedural cosmetic operator: `:upward(...)`
The purpose is to lookup an ancestor element.
When used with an integer argument, it is synonym of
`:nth-ancestor()`, which will be deprecated and which
will no longer be supported once no longer used in
mainstream filter lists.
Filter lists maintainers must only use `:upward(int)`
instead of `:nth-ancestor(int)` once the new operator
become available in all stable releases of uBO.
`:upward()` can also accept a CSS selector as argument,
in which case the nearest ancestor which matches the
CSS selector will be selected.
Regression from:
- 62387fb87a
Repro steps were:
- Open the logger
- Navigate to `https://news.ycombinator.com/`
- Select an element using the element picker
- Click "Preview"
An attribute selector used internally by uBO to
hide targeted nodes was being reported in the
logger.
Related issue:
- https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/127
Additionally, the extended exception filters in the
logger will be rendered with a line-through to more
easily distinguish them from non-exception ones.
Also, opportunistically converted revisited code to
ES6 syntax.
commit ab2b328cf1360a751fa1c58b8521f907eeb1ec50
Author: Raymond Hill <rhill@raymondhill.net>
Date: Thu Apr 12 12:08:30 2018 -0400
fix#3588
commit c4ae7638dfa5a5c7ddec2f9dd2d2988450082542
Author: Raymond Hill <rhill@raymondhill.net>
Date: Thu Apr 12 09:08:56 2018 -0400
detect user stylesheets support from content scripts (#3588)
