Mirrors/uBlock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git synced 2024-11-22 18:32:45 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
Mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
29 Commits 2 Branches 966 Tags 210 MiB
JavaScript 88.6%
CSS 4.8%
HTML 3.4%
WebAssembly 2.4%
Shell 0.6%
4da49fe0a3
Go to file
gorhill 4da49fe0a3 details on benchmarks
2014-06-24 10:20:52 -04:00
_locales lnaguage stuff 2014-06-23 20:03:41 -04:00
assets this fixes #1 2014-06-24 07:27:06 -04:00
css first commit 2014-06-23 18:42:43 -04:00
dist new revision 2014-06-24 07:26:45 -04:00
doc/img ... 2014-06-24 00:27:22 -04:00
img first commit 2014-06-23 18:42:43 -04:00
js fine tuning visuals 2014-06-24 01:20:59 -04:00
lib first commit 2014-06-23 18:42:43 -04:00
1p-filters.html first commit 2014-06-23 18:42:43 -04:00
3p-filters.html fixed "raced condition" between two onLoad listener 2014-06-23 21:09:31 -04:00
about.html first commit 2014-06-23 18:42:43 -04:00
background.html need charset 2014-06-23 18:58:36 -04:00
dashboard.html first commit 2014-06-23 18:42:43 -04:00
LICENSE.txt first commit 2014-06-23 18:42:43 -04:00
manifest.json this fixes #1 2014-06-24 07:27:06 -04:00
popup.html fine tuning visuals 2014-06-24 01:20:59 -04:00
README.md details on benchmarks 2014-06-24 10:20:52 -04:00

README.md

µBlock for Chromium

See Change log for latest changes.

An efficient blocker for Chromium-based browsers. Fast and lean.

screenshot

Some articles about the origin of the source code behind µBlock:

Forums:

Installation

From the Chrome store, or manually.

To benefit from the higher efficiency, it is of course not advised to use an inefficient blocker at the same time. µBlock will do as well or better than the popular blockers out there.

Benchmark

I ran my reference benchmark to compare against three popular blockers.

Results -- figures are 3rd party / all:

µBlock 0.1.0.4

  • Domains: 66 / 67
  • Hosts: 117 / 171
  • Scripts: 239 / 321
  • Outbound cookies: 8 / 42
  • Net requests: 1,035 / 1,877

Adblock Plus 1.8.3

  • Domains: 72 / 73
  • Hosts: 124 / 177
  • Scripts: 243 / 328
  • Outbound cookies: 8 / 44
  • Net requests: 1,041 / 1,913

Ghostery 5.3.0

  • Domains: 83 / 84
  • Hosts: 140 / 211
  • Scripts: 239 / 343
  • Outbound cookies: 17 / 57
  • Net requests: 1,046 / 1,930

Adguard 1.0.2.9

  • Domains: 89 / 90
  • Hosts: 145 / 217
  • Scripts: 262 / 349
  • Outbound cookies: 18 / 68
  • Net requests: 1,064 / 1,904

Disconnect 5.18.14

  • Domains: 95 / 96
  • Hosts: 163 / 239
  • Scripts: 283 / 381
  • Outbound cookies: 18 / 74
  • Net requests: 1,087 / 1,989

No blocker

  • Domains: 380 / 381
  • Hosts: 566 / 644
  • Scripts: 490 / 592
  • Outbound cookies: 245 / 315
  • Net requests: 1,950 / 2,871

The figures show the number of requests allowed, thus lower numbers are better. The point is to show how many 3rd-party servers are hit on average after running the reference benchmark (three repeats in the current instance).

The less hits on 3rd-party servers, the better. All blockers where configured in such a way as to compare apples-vs-apples.

Details of the benchmark

  • µBlock: out-of-the-box settings -- nochange.
  • Adblock Plus: "EasyList", "EasyPrivacy", "Malware Domains" checked. "Acceptable ads" unchecked.
  • Ghostery: "Advertising", "Analytics", "Beacons", "Privacy" checked. "Widgets" unchecked. "GhostRank" unchecked.
  • Adguard: "English", "Spyware and tracking", "Phishing and malware protection" checked. "Acceptable ads" unchecked.
  • Disconnect: out-of-the-box settings -- nochange.

About

µBlock is born out of HTTP Switchboard. All the niceties of HTTPSB have been removed, and what is left is a straightforward blocker which support EasyList and the likes, and also support host files. Cosmetic filters ("element hiding") are supported.

There is nothing more to it. But it does what popular blockers out there do, at a fraction of CPU and memory usage for the same blocking power.

Free. Open source. No donations sought. For users by users.

License

GPLv3.