From 038f0837bb984b965cccee6c1c3eb80436758fdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 16:34:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20vs.=20ABP:=20efficiency?= =?UTF-8?q?=20compared=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md index 750cff1..382c826 100644 --- a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md +++ b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ Now keep in mind this is the added footprint for a very simple web page which ha Above picture gives an overview of how much more memory Adblock Plus consumes over µBlock. The [reference benchmark](/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Reference-benchmark) was used, which consists in visiting 60 front page of high traffic web sites. +The vertical represents MB. The horizontal axes is time in seconds, and the data was tediously extracted from [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKM78oV_ftg) (consider the video to be the raw data -- I need to publish my spreadsheet as well so people can double check in doubt). + The blue area represents how much more ABP itself consumes more memory then µBlock. The orange area represents how much more ABP causes the web pages themselves to consume more memory. ### Related wiki pages