mirror of
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git
synced 2024-10-06 09:37:12 +02:00
Updated About "uBlock is inferior in capabilities as a result of being lighter on the browser"... (markdown)
parent
4fce9b2883
commit
12140bf8dc
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ uBlock Origin is lighter on the browser because of many choices which were made
|
|||||||
- Example, `&ad_zones=` (filter found in EasyList).
|
- Example, `&ad_zones=` (filter found in EasyList).
|
||||||
- ABP's code conceptually is: `/&ad_zones=/.test(url)` -- the whole URL must be scanned
|
- ABP's code conceptually is: `/&ad_zones=/.test(url)` -- the whole URL must be scanned
|
||||||
- uBO's code conceptually is: `url.startsWith('&ad_zones=', i)` -- no scanning of the URL
|
- uBO's code conceptually is: `url.startsWith('&ad_zones=', i)` -- no scanning of the URL
|
||||||
- does **not** unconditionally inject 18,000+ (that is with EasyList only) generic CSS rules in all pages/frames<br><sup>meaning no undue [memory usage issues](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1320872)</sup>
|
- does not unconditionally inject 18,000+ (that is with EasyList only) generic CSS rules in all pages/frames<br><sup>meaning no undue [memory usage issues](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1320872)</sup>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Do these design choices really cause uBO to be _"inferior in capabilities"_ compared to ABP? See the capabilities comparison grid below for an answer (at time of writing):
|
Do these design choices really cause uBO to be _"inferior in capabilities"_ compared to ABP? See the capabilities comparison grid below for an answer (at time of writing):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user