From 32df7524b3800daac0f8fae9196f8fdaa6632f67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gorhill Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:02:39 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU (markdown) --- ...bout efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md b/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md index f4d6dc8..230d41b 100644 --- a/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md +++ b/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md @@ -13,4 +13,10 @@ Memory and CPU cycles are finite resources. A sure way for a developer to **not* Not convinced yet? Try [this online tool](http://www.numion.com/StopWatch/index.html) to compare how fast web pages load when using one blocker compared to another. -First with Adblock Plus. Refresh many times. Notice the result. Then try with µBlock. Refresh many times. **Do you see the difference?** \ No newline at end of file +If you have a multi-core CPU, and hence plenty of spare CPU cycles, granted, there may not be such a noticeable difference in page load, but other popular blockers will definitely make use of plenty of whatever spare CPU cycles available (see below) to perform the same job as µBlock. + +CPU overhead
+![CPU overhead](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/cpu-usage-overall-chart-20141226.png) + +Memory overhead
+![Memory overhead](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-overall-chart-20141224.png) \ No newline at end of file