1
0
mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git synced 2024-07-08 12:57:57 +02:00

uBlock to uBlock Origin (and to uBO)

neonItem 2022-02-06 18:31:50 +02:00
parent ec06839b40
commit 51ebb73d8e

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ domains reported as "3rd-party" actually belong to the same entity which owns th
Results -- figures are "3rd party / all". Ordered from least 3rd-party hits to most 3rd-party hits. Privacy-wise, lower numbers are better.
#### uBlock 0.2.3.3
#### uBlock Origin (uBO) 0.2.3.3
- Distinct 1st-party/3rd-party pairs: **245**
- Scripts: 569 / 852
@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ Privacy Badger: warning from the browser: _"This extension is slowing down Chrom
Ultimately, if you **really** want to increase significantly control over your privacy, [HTTP Switchboard](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard#http-switchboard-for-chromium) is the way to go.
If web page breakage annoys you, just start using HTTP Switchboard in [allow-all/block-exceptionally mode](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/How-to-use-HTTP-Switchboard:-Two-opposing-views#the-allow-allblock-exceptionally-approach),
and blocklist your way up from this starting point. Unlike uBlock and others here, HTTP Switchboard does not
and blocklist your way up from this starting point. Unlike uBO and others here, HTTP Switchboard does not
have unseen exception filters which often defeat good blocking filters. For example, [**this**](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/About-these-%22%E2%80%98virtually-impossible%E2%80%99-to-block%22-fingerprinting-tools#kind-of-low-breakage) is the way to foil many fingerprinting tricks, canvas fingerprinting included, without preventing javascript execution.
### Methodology
All blockers were configured in such a way as to compare apples-vs-apples:
- **uBlock:** out-of-the-box settings -- no change.
- **uBO:** out-of-the-box settings -- no change.
- **Adblock Plus:** out-of-the-box settings + _"EasyPrivacy"_, _"Malware Domains"_ checked. _"Acceptable ads"_ unchecked. _"Update now"_ clicked.
- **Ghostery:** out-of-the-box settings + _"Advertising"_, _"Analytics"_, _"Beacons"_, _"Privacy"_ checked. _"Widgets"_ not checked. _"GhostRank"_ not checked. _"Update now"_ clicked (and ensured whatever new filters were used).
- **Adguard:** out-of-the-box settings + _"Spyware and tracking"_, _"Phishing and malware protection"_ checked. _"Social media"_ not checked. _"Acceptable ads"_ unchecked. _"Check for filter updates"_ clicked.
@ -104,6 +104,6 @@ and each extension was tested as the only extension active in the browser.
The official [Public Suffix List](https://publicsuffix.org/list/) is used to determine the domain of a URL.
**Note regarding the methodology:** It has been said that I was unfair toward ABP because I didn't
use [Peter Lowes Ad server](http://pgl.yoyo.org/) list for ABP while I did for uBlock. It is
use [Peter Lowes Ad server](http://pgl.yoyo.org/) list for ABP while I did for uBO. It is
true that I could have imported the list into ABP, which most certainly account for the difference
between ABP and uBlock. My answer to this is available at [Wilders Security Forum](http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/%C2%B5block-a-lean-and-fast-blocker.365273/page-3#post-2386023).
between ABP and uBO. My answer to this is available at [Wilders Security Forum](http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/%C2%B5block-a-lean-and-fast-blocker.365273/page-3#post-2386023).