diff --git a/Own memory usage: benchmarks over time.md b/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
similarity index 79%
rename from Own memory usage: benchmarks over time.md
rename to Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
index 46b9228..e2c887d 100644
--- a/Own memory usage: benchmarks over time.md	
+++ b/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Just a place for me to keep track of comparative memory usage over time. Screens
 ### 23 December 2014
 
 - Chromium 39.0.2171.65 64-bit (Linux)
-- µBlock 0.8.2.2
+- uBlock 0.8.2.2
 - AdBlock 2.15
 - Adblock Plus 1.8.8
 - Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8
@@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ After benchmark completed:<br>
 ![after](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-20141223-after.png)
 
 Observations during benchmark:
-- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. Whereas µBlock consistently show at most low-single digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range.
+- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. Whereas uBlock consistently show at most low-single digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range.
 
 Settings:
-- **µBlock 0.8.2.2**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch).
+- **uBlock 0.8.2.2**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch).
 - **AdBlock 2.15**: _AdBlock custom filters_, _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware protection_.
 - **Adblock Plus 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled.
 - **Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8**: _English filters_, _Spyware filter_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Social media filter‎_, _Phishing and malware protection_. _Allow acceptable ads_ disabled.
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Notes:
 ### 18 September 2014
 
 - Chromium 37.0.2062.94 64-bit (Linux)
-- µBlock v 0.6.2.1
+- uBlock v 0.6.2.1
 - AdBlock 2.7.13
 - Adblock Plus 1.8.5
 - Ghostery 5.4.0
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Observations during benchmark:
 - AdBlock is *very* CPU intensive. Adblock Plus also, although to a lesser degree compared to AdBlock.
 
 Settings:
-- **µBlock v 0.6.2.1**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch).
+- **uBlock v 0.6.2.1**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch).
 - **AdBlock 2.7.13**: _AdBlock custom filters_, _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware protection_.
 - **Adblock Plus 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled.
 - **Ghostery 5.4.0**: _Blocking all trackers_. Ghostrank not selected. _Alert bubble_ disabled.