From 892f56d15dcef8a936e7aa46b0627cec6e3c45c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: q1800 <95879668+q1800@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 10:00:37 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] More naming convention fixes

---
 Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md b/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md
index db93527..296c47c 100644
--- a/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md
+++ b/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ I think it's time I give examples of how requiring _fewer_ permissions is **not*
 
 Chrome store: Web Protector - Reliable Phishing Protection (the extension no longer exists on the Chrome Web Store).
 
-This extension requires the same permission as uBlock, _minus_ the `privacy` one. Some might be inclined that it can thus be more trusted than uBlock, which requires the `privacy` permission.
+This extension requires the same permission as uBO, _minus_ the `privacy` one. Some might be inclined that it can thus be more trusted than uBO, which requires the `privacy` permission.
 
 However, Web Protector has a home server, and it does "phone home" as opposed to uBO (which has no home server in the first place).