From 99a314182ba11e98394d235e4399fad132da9882 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 00:07:35 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Destroyed Dynamic filtering: disabling cosmetic filtering for the current site (markdown) --- ...abling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md diff --git a/Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md b/Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md deleted file mode 100644 index c9b8525..0000000 --- a/Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -[Back to "Dynamic-filtering"](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Dynamic-filtering) - -*** - -Someone asked me if it was possible to disable cosmetic filtering for the current site, without disabling uBlock, so as to keep the ability to block 3rd parties, to prevent them from injecting their ads, trackers, analytics, etc. - -This is actually possible using dynamic filtering: a simple local `allow` rule (green) for the current site: - -![Toggling on/off cosmetic filtering](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/df-turn-off-cosmetic.gif)
-Only `twitter.com` is whitelisted, `google-analytics.com` is still blocked. - -Using an `allow` rule for the current site will disable network **and** cosmetic filtering for the 1st-party domain. \ No newline at end of file