From ac0c6035a3d2846bc385070a7614483df4859458 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:02:03 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20vs.=20ABP:=20efficiency?= =?UTF-8?q?=20compared=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md index 8f68357..a630e28 100644 --- a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md +++ b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Now keep in mind this is the added footprint for a very simple web page which ha ![µBlock vs. Adblock: memory usage differential during reference benchmark](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/media/ublock-vs-abp-cpu-2.png) -Above picture gives an overview of how much more memory Adblock Plus consumes over µBlock. It represents the **extra memory** ABP consumes relative to µBlock -- so essentially µBlock is the horizontal axis. The [reference benchmark](/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Reference-benchmark) was used, which consists in visiting 60 front page of high traffic web sites. +Above picture gives an overview of how much more memory Adblock Plus consumes over µBlock. It represents the **extra memory** ABP consumes relative to µBlock -- so essentially µBlock is the horizontal axis. If memory consumption of ABP and µBlock were exactly the same, there would be no graph. The [reference benchmark](/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Reference-benchmark) was used, which consists in visiting 60 front page of high traffic web sites. The vertical represents MB. The horizontal axes is time in seconds, and the data was tediously extracted from [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKM78oV_ftg) (consider the video to be the raw data -- I need to publish my spreadsheet as well so people can double check in doubt).