From afb506da445f70cfb141698a37029d12767d529c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gwarser Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 22:05:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Chinese link is invalid --- uBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/uBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md b/uBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md index 5d2d354..c9704fd 100644 --- a/uBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md +++ b/uBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md @@ -1,7 +1,3 @@ -[中文](https://github.com/fang5566/uBlock/wiki/%C2%B5Block-%E5%92%8C-ABP-%E5%9C%A8%E8%BF%90%E8%A1%8C%E6%95%88%E7%8E%87%E6%96%B9%E9%9D%A2%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%B9%E6%AF%94) - -*** - Here is a quick illustrated comparison of efficiency using various angles. Each extension were tested alone, as the only extension present. Benchmarking was performed with Chromium on Linux Mint 64-bit. - [Own memory footprint](#own-memory-footprint)