From cd2e8f141607a039ec575a892d0ac05956737497 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gorhill <rhill@raymondhill.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:19:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Updated Dynamic filtering: Benefits of blocking 3rd party
 iframe tags (markdown)

---
 ...mic filtering: Benefits of blocking 3rd party iframe tags.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Dynamic filtering: Benefits of blocking 3rd party iframe tags.md b/Dynamic filtering: Benefits of blocking 3rd party iframe tags.md
index 4f440d7..73c2642 100644
--- a/Dynamic filtering: Benefits of blocking 3rd party iframe tags.md	
+++ b/Dynamic filtering: Benefits of blocking 3rd party iframe tags.md	
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ URL: <http://www.riskiq.com/resources/blog/jquerycom-malware-attack-puts-privile
 
 `iframe` are very often used by malware code on compromised web sites. The most recent example of this is [jquery.com](http://blog.jquery.com/2014/09/24/update-on-jquery-com-compromises/).
 
-The web site was compromised, and users of the site were served tainted web pages, which were causing a user's browser to download exploit kit from some remote servers. This was done first through a malicious 3rd-party `<script>`, which purpose was to dynamically create and embed a 3rd-party-sourced `<iframe>` on the page.
+The web site was compromised, and users of the site were served tainted web pages, which could cause a user's browser to download exploit kit from some remote servers. This was done first through a malicious 3rd-party `<script>`, which purpose was to dynamically create and embed a 3rd-party-sourced `<iframe>` on the page.
 
 Using 3rd-party-sourced `<iframe>` to inject exploit on a user's computer is quite a common technique. [Example](http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/10/hackers-compromise-official-php-website-infect-visitors-with-malware/), [example](http://www.wired.com/2013/08/freedom-hosting/), [example](http://blog.armorize.com/2011/07/willysycom-mass-injection-ongoing.html), etc.