From d79fa56655bbc288e1766f44e8856c8694f1e956 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: q1800 <95879668+q1800@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 20:50:12 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Misc fixes

---
 Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md b/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md
index f3e1cc5..9f94ea5 100644
--- a/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md
+++ b/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Here is an example of uBO's overhead added to a [atypically large page from a ni
 |uBO fully enabled | 537.63 ms
 |uBO enabled, cosmetic filtering disabled | 488.23 ms
 |uBO disabled | 488.41 ms
-|No blocker |  474.77 ms
+|No blocker | 474.77 ms
 
 Of course, there is no point benchmarking pages from less nice sites, as these pages will always load much faster when using a blocker -- though you may want to benchmark different blockers with similar settings.