From d82e6994a744a03330345043cb915764bbec700b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 18:46:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Dynamic filtering: disabling cosmetic filtering for the current site (markdown) --- ...ring:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md b/Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md index 10a4fe5..7196fa1 100644 --- a/Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md +++ b/Dynamic-filtering:-disabling-cosmetic-filtering-for-the-current-site.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ *** -Someone asked me if it was possible to enable ads which originate only from the site itself, but without disabling uBlock for the site, so as to not allow 3rd-parties to inject their ads, trackers, analytics, etc. +Someone asked me if it was possible to disable cosmetic filtering for the current site, while keeping the ability to block 3rd-parties, so as to not allow these to inject their ads, trackers, analytics, etc. -This is actually possible using dynamic filtering: a simple locakl `allow` rule for the current site: +This is actually possible using dynamic filtering: a simple local `allow` rule for the current site: