From da61c40cf7e3e0b0b68a6888dbd59cb94b8496f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:12:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Inline script tag filtering (markdown) --- Inline-script-tag-filtering.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md index 441d804..413e4b0 100644 --- a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md +++ b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ The _uBlock filters_ list, which is selected by default, already contains a coup Because blocking inline script tags are conceptually closer to cosmetic filtering than network filtering: inline script tags are embedded in a web page, so if the web page is downloaded, the inline script tags are downloaded -- there is no way around this. -Whatever can't be blocked using a network request filter can be taken care by a cosmetic filter, which is the hiding of DOM elements from a web page. Hence inline script tag filtering is implemented using the cosmetic filter syntax -- the only difference is that when blocked, inline script tags are not removed from view (they are already invisible) but instead the execution of the javascript code inside the script tag is blocked. +Whatever can't be blocked using a network request filter can be taken care by a cosmetic filter, which is the hiding of DOM elements in a web page. Hence inline script tag filtering is implemented using the cosmetic filter syntax -- the only difference is that when blocked, inline script tags are not removed from view (they are already invisible) but instead the execution of the javascript code inside the script tag is blocked. ***