mirror of
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git
synced 2024-10-02 23:57:10 +02:00
Warn about the breaking changes of CSSTree
parent
9e8f78d07d
commit
dc04376a3e
@ -20,6 +20,15 @@ _Procedural_ means JavaScript code will find DOM elements that it must hide. A p
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Concatenating multiple procedural selectors in one filter is not supported. `example.com##p:has(img),div:has-text(advert)` will not work as expected ([#453](https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/453)).
|
1. Concatenating multiple procedural selectors in one filter is not supported. `example.com##p:has(img),div:has-text(advert)` will not work as expected ([#453](https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/453)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. [New cosmetic filter parser using CSSTree library](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commit/a71b71e4c8a2037fc68970bc8912a76732edaade). The new parser no longer uses the browser DOM to validate
|
||||||
|
that a cosmetic filter is valid or not, this is now done
|
||||||
|
through a JS library, CSSTree. This means filter list authors will have to be more careful
|
||||||
|
to ensure that a cosmetic filter is really valid, as there is
|
||||||
|
no more guarantee that a cosmetic filter which works for a
|
||||||
|
given browser/version will still work properly on another
|
||||||
|
browser, or different version of the same browser. The new parser introduces breaking changes, there was no way to do otherwise. Some current procedural cosmetic filters will
|
||||||
|
be shown as invalid with this change. Read the commit message for more details.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Cosmetic filter operators
|
## Cosmetic filter operators
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### `subject:has(arg)`
|
### `subject:has(arg)`
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user