2009-10-13 20:10:05 +02:00
|
|
|
; RUN: opt < %s -simplifycfg -S | FileCheck %s
|
2003-08-24 19:58:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-03-18 04:45:45 +01:00
|
|
|
declare void @bar()
|
2003-08-24 19:58:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-13 20:13:05 +02:00
|
|
|
; This testcase checks to see if the simplifycfg pass is converting invoke
|
|
|
|
; instructions to call instructions if the handler just rethrows the exception.
|
2009-10-13 20:10:05 +02:00
|
|
|
define i32 @test1() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @bar()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
|
2008-03-18 04:45:45 +01:00
|
|
|
invoke void @bar( )
|
|
|
|
to label %Ok unwind label %Rethrow
|
|
|
|
Ok: ; preds = %0
|
|
|
|
ret i32 0
|
|
|
|
Rethrow: ; preds = %0
|
|
|
|
unwind
|
2003-08-24 19:58:24 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-10-13 20:13:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Verify that simplifycfg isn't duplicating 'unwind' instructions. Doing this
|
|
|
|
; is bad because it discourages commoning.
|
|
|
|
define i32 @test2(i1 %c) {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @test2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: T:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @bar()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %F
|
|
|
|
br i1 %c, label %T, label %F
|
|
|
|
T:
|
|
|
|
call void @bar()
|
|
|
|
br label %F
|
|
|
|
F:
|
|
|
|
unwind
|
|
|
|
}
|