1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-26 04:32:44 +01:00
llvm-mirror/utils/TableGen/CodeGenSchedule.h

644 lines
23 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

//===- CodeGenSchedule.h - Scheduling Machine Models ------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file defines structures to encapsulate the machine model as described in
// the target description.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#ifndef LLVM_UTILS_TABLEGEN_CODEGENSCHEDULE_H
#define LLVM_UTILS_TABLEGEN_CODEGENSCHEDULE_H
[TableGen][SubtargetEmitter] Add the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking instructions. That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions. The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name). ``` virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return false; } virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return isZeroIdiom(MI); } ``` An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true. The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code). Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls would always return false. A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a property in common. STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence classes. Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions. Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in XXXGenSubtargetInfo. This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only. This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310). The main advantages are: - We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates. - We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via tablegen in the scheduling models. In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems. Examples of future developments are: - Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves - Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own concept of "slow" LEA). - Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies on the output registers on some processors only. It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes. For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region. This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as possible. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174 llvm-svn: 342555
2018-09-19 17:57:45 +02:00
#include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/StringMap.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/TableGen/Record.h"
#include "llvm/TableGen/SetTheory.h"
namespace llvm {
class CodeGenTarget;
class CodeGenSchedModels;
class CodeGenInstruction;
[MC][Tablegen] Allow the definition of processor register files in the scheduling model for llvm-mca This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling models. This addresses PR36662. A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td. Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify: - The total number of physical registers. - Which target registers are accessible through the register file. - The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage. Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td) def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]> Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar (btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM register definitions only cost 1 physical register. The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of physical registers". This patch is structured in two parts. * Part 1 - MC/Tablegen * A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files. Information about register files is accessible through an instance of MCExtraProcessorInfo. The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor information used by the llvm machine schedulers. I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra processor information if they don't want it. * Part 2 - llvm-mca related * The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca. The main differences are: 1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register" when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage. 2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the "maximum 32 register files" restriction. 3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra details related to each register file implemented by the processor. The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980 llvm-svn: 329067
2018-04-03 15:36:24 +02:00
class CodeGenRegisterClass;
using RecVec = std::vector<Record*>;
using RecIter = std::vector<Record*>::const_iterator;
using IdxVec = std::vector<unsigned>;
using IdxIter = std::vector<unsigned>::const_iterator;
/// We have two kinds of SchedReadWrites. Explicitly defined and inferred
/// sequences. TheDef is nonnull for explicit SchedWrites, but Sequence may or
/// may not be empty. TheDef is null for inferred sequences, and Sequence must
/// be nonempty.
///
/// IsVariadic controls whether the variants are expanded into multiple operands
/// or a sequence of writes on one operand.
struct CodeGenSchedRW {
unsigned Index;
std::string Name;
Record *TheDef;
bool IsRead;
bool IsAlias;
bool HasVariants;
bool IsVariadic;
bool IsSequence;
IdxVec Sequence;
RecVec Aliases;
CodeGenSchedRW()
: Index(0), TheDef(nullptr), IsRead(false), IsAlias(false),
HasVariants(false), IsVariadic(false), IsSequence(false) {}
CodeGenSchedRW(unsigned Idx, Record *Def)
: Index(Idx), TheDef(Def), IsAlias(false), IsVariadic(false) {
Name = Def->getName();
IsRead = Def->isSubClassOf("SchedRead");
HasVariants = Def->isSubClassOf("SchedVariant");
if (HasVariants)
IsVariadic = Def->getValueAsBit("Variadic");
// Read records don't currently have sequences, but it can be easily
// added. Note that implicit Reads (from ReadVariant) may have a Sequence
// (but no record).
IsSequence = Def->isSubClassOf("WriteSequence");
}
CodeGenSchedRW(unsigned Idx, bool Read, ArrayRef<unsigned> Seq,
const std::string &Name)
: Index(Idx), Name(Name), TheDef(nullptr), IsRead(Read), IsAlias(false),
HasVariants(false), IsVariadic(false), IsSequence(true), Sequence(Seq) {
assert(Sequence.size() > 1 && "implied sequence needs >1 RWs");
}
bool isValid() const {
assert((!HasVariants || TheDef) && "Variant write needs record def");
assert((!IsVariadic || HasVariants) && "Variadic write needs variants");
assert((!IsSequence || !HasVariants) && "Sequence can't have variant");
assert((!IsSequence || !Sequence.empty()) && "Sequence should be nonempty");
assert((!IsAlias || Aliases.empty()) && "Alias cannot have aliases");
return TheDef || !Sequence.empty();
}
#ifndef NDEBUG
void dump() const;
#endif
};
2012-09-18 06:03:30 +02:00
/// Represent a transition between SchedClasses induced by SchedVariant.
struct CodeGenSchedTransition {
unsigned ToClassIdx;
IdxVec ProcIndices;
RecVec PredTerm;
};
/// Scheduling class.
///
/// Each instruction description will be mapped to a scheduling class. There are
/// four types of classes:
///
/// 1) An explicitly defined itinerary class with ItinClassDef set.
/// Writes and ReadDefs are empty. ProcIndices contains 0 for any processor.
///
/// 2) An implied class with a list of SchedWrites and SchedReads that are
/// defined in an instruction definition and which are common across all
/// subtargets. ProcIndices contains 0 for any processor.
///
/// 3) An implied class with a list of InstRW records that map instructions to
/// SchedWrites and SchedReads per-processor. InstrClassMap should map the same
/// instructions to this class. ProcIndices contains all the processors that
/// provided InstrRW records for this class. ItinClassDef or Writes/Reads may
/// still be defined for processors with no InstRW entry.
///
/// 4) An inferred class represents a variant of another class that may be
/// resolved at runtime. ProcIndices contains the set of processors that may
/// require the class. ProcIndices are propagated through SchedClasses as
/// variants are expanded. Multiple SchedClasses may be inferred from an
/// itinerary class. Each inherits the processor index from the ItinRW record
/// that mapped the itinerary class to the variant Writes or Reads.
struct CodeGenSchedClass {
unsigned Index;
std::string Name;
Record *ItinClassDef;
IdxVec Writes;
IdxVec Reads;
// Sorted list of ProcIdx, where ProcIdx==0 implies any processor.
IdxVec ProcIndices;
std::vector<CodeGenSchedTransition> Transitions;
// InstRW records associated with this class. These records may refer to an
// Instruction no longer mapped to this class by InstrClassMap. These
// Instructions should be ignored by this class because they have been split
// off to join another inferred class.
RecVec InstRWs;
CodeGenSchedClass(unsigned Index, std::string Name, Record *ItinClassDef)
: Index(Index), Name(std::move(Name)), ItinClassDef(ItinClassDef) {}
bool isKeyEqual(Record *IC, ArrayRef<unsigned> W,
ArrayRef<unsigned> R) const {
return ItinClassDef == IC && makeArrayRef(Writes) == W &&
makeArrayRef(Reads) == R;
}
// Is this class generated from a variants if existing classes? Instructions
// are never mapped directly to inferred scheduling classes.
bool isInferred() const { return !ItinClassDef; }
#ifndef NDEBUG
void dump(const CodeGenSchedModels *SchedModels) const;
#endif
};
[MC][Tablegen] Allow the definition of processor register files in the scheduling model for llvm-mca This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling models. This addresses PR36662. A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td. Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify: - The total number of physical registers. - Which target registers are accessible through the register file. - The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage. Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td) def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]> Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar (btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM register definitions only cost 1 physical register. The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of physical registers". This patch is structured in two parts. * Part 1 - MC/Tablegen * A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files. Information about register files is accessible through an instance of MCExtraProcessorInfo. The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor information used by the llvm machine schedulers. I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra processor information if they don't want it. * Part 2 - llvm-mca related * The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca. The main differences are: 1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register" when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage. 2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the "maximum 32 register files" restriction. 3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra details related to each register file implemented by the processor. The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980 llvm-svn: 329067
2018-04-03 15:36:24 +02:00
/// Represent the cost of allocating a register of register class RCDef.
///
/// The cost of allocating a register is equivalent to the number of physical
/// registers used by the register renamer. Register costs are defined at
/// register class granularity.
struct CodeGenRegisterCost {
Record *RCDef;
unsigned Cost;
CodeGenRegisterCost(Record *RC, unsigned RegisterCost)
: RCDef(RC), Cost(RegisterCost) {}
CodeGenRegisterCost(const CodeGenRegisterCost &) = default;
CodeGenRegisterCost &operator=(const CodeGenRegisterCost &) = delete;
};
/// A processor register file.
///
/// This class describes a processor register file. Register file information is
/// currently consumed by external tools like llvm-mca to predict dispatch
/// stalls due to register pressure.
struct CodeGenRegisterFile {
std::string Name;
Record *RegisterFileDef;
unsigned NumPhysRegs;
std::vector<CodeGenRegisterCost> Costs;
CodeGenRegisterFile(StringRef name, Record *def)
: Name(name), RegisterFileDef(def), NumPhysRegs(0) {}
bool hasDefaultCosts() const { return Costs.empty(); }
};
// Processor model.
//
// ModelName is a unique name used to name an instantiation of MCSchedModel.
//
// ModelDef is NULL for inferred Models. This happens when a processor defines
// an itinerary but no machine model. If the processor defines neither a machine
// model nor itinerary, then ModelDef remains pointing to NoModel. NoModel has
// the special "NoModel" field set to true.
//
// ItinsDef always points to a valid record definition, but may point to the
// default NoItineraries. NoItineraries has an empty list of InstrItinData
// records.
//
// ItinDefList orders this processor's InstrItinData records by SchedClass idx.
struct CodeGenProcModel {
unsigned Index;
std::string ModelName;
Record *ModelDef;
Record *ItinsDef;
// Derived members...
// Array of InstrItinData records indexed by a CodeGenSchedClass index.
// This list is empty if the Processor has no value for Itineraries.
// Initialized by collectProcItins().
RecVec ItinDefList;
// Map itinerary classes to per-operand resources.
// This list is empty if no ItinRW refers to this Processor.
RecVec ItinRWDefs;
// List of unsupported feature.
// This list is empty if the Processor has no UnsupportedFeatures.
RecVec UnsupportedFeaturesDefs;
// All read/write resources associated with this processor.
RecVec WriteResDefs;
RecVec ReadAdvanceDefs;
// Per-operand machine model resources associated with this processor.
RecVec ProcResourceDefs;
[MC][Tablegen] Allow the definition of processor register files in the scheduling model for llvm-mca This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling models. This addresses PR36662. A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td. Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify: - The total number of physical registers. - Which target registers are accessible through the register file. - The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage. Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td) def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]> Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar (btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM register definitions only cost 1 physical register. The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of physical registers". This patch is structured in two parts. * Part 1 - MC/Tablegen * A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files. Information about register files is accessible through an instance of MCExtraProcessorInfo. The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor information used by the llvm machine schedulers. I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra processor information if they don't want it. * Part 2 - llvm-mca related * The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca. The main differences are: 1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register" when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage. 2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the "maximum 32 register files" restriction. 3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra details related to each register file implemented by the processor. The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980 llvm-svn: 329067
2018-04-03 15:36:24 +02:00
// List of Register Files.
std::vector<CodeGenRegisterFile> RegisterFiles;
// Optional Retire Control Unit definition.
Record *RetireControlUnit;
// List of PfmCounters.
RecVec PfmIssueCounterDefs;
Record *PfmCycleCounterDef = nullptr;
Record *PfmUopsCounterDef = nullptr;
CodeGenProcModel(unsigned Idx, std::string Name, Record *MDef,
Record *IDef) :
Index(Idx), ModelName(std::move(Name)), ModelDef(MDef), ItinsDef(IDef),
RetireControlUnit(nullptr) {}
bool hasItineraries() const {
return !ItinsDef->getValueAsListOfDefs("IID").empty();
}
bool hasInstrSchedModel() const {
return !WriteResDefs.empty() || !ItinRWDefs.empty();
}
[MC][Tablegen] Allow the definition of processor register files in the scheduling model for llvm-mca This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling models. This addresses PR36662. A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td. Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify: - The total number of physical registers. - Which target registers are accessible through the register file. - The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage. Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td) def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]> Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar (btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM register definitions only cost 1 physical register. The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of physical registers". This patch is structured in two parts. * Part 1 - MC/Tablegen * A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files. Information about register files is accessible through an instance of MCExtraProcessorInfo. The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor information used by the llvm machine schedulers. I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra processor information if they don't want it. * Part 2 - llvm-mca related * The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca. The main differences are: 1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register" when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage. 2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the "maximum 32 register files" restriction. 3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra details related to each register file implemented by the processor. The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980 llvm-svn: 329067
2018-04-03 15:36:24 +02:00
bool hasExtraProcessorInfo() const {
return RetireControlUnit || !RegisterFiles.empty() ||
!PfmIssueCounterDefs.empty() ||
PfmCycleCounterDef != nullptr ||
PfmUopsCounterDef != nullptr;
[MC][Tablegen] Allow the definition of processor register files in the scheduling model for llvm-mca This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling models. This addresses PR36662. A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td. Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify: - The total number of physical registers. - Which target registers are accessible through the register file. - The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage. Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td) def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]> Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar (btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM register definitions only cost 1 physical register. The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of physical registers". This patch is structured in two parts. * Part 1 - MC/Tablegen * A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files. Information about register files is accessible through an instance of MCExtraProcessorInfo. The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor information used by the llvm machine schedulers. I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra processor information if they don't want it. * Part 2 - llvm-mca related * The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca. The main differences are: 1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register" when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage. 2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the "maximum 32 register files" restriction. 3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra details related to each register file implemented by the processor. The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980 llvm-svn: 329067
2018-04-03 15:36:24 +02:00
}
unsigned getProcResourceIdx(Record *PRDef) const;
bool isUnsupported(const CodeGenInstruction &Inst) const;
#ifndef NDEBUG
void dump() const;
#endif
};
[TableGen][SubtargetEmitter] Add the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking instructions. That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions. The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name). ``` virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return false; } virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return isZeroIdiom(MI); } ``` An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true. The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code). Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls would always return false. A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a property in common. STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence classes. Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions. Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in XXXGenSubtargetInfo. This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only. This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310). The main advantages are: - We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates. - We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via tablegen in the scheduling models. In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems. Examples of future developments are: - Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves - Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own concept of "slow" LEA). - Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies on the output registers on some processors only. It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes. For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region. This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as possible. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174 llvm-svn: 342555
2018-09-19 17:57:45 +02:00
/// Used to correlate instructions to MCInstPredicates specified by
/// InstructionEquivalentClass tablegen definitions.
///
/// Example: a XOR of a register with self, is a known zero-idiom for most
/// X86 processors.
///
/// Each processor can use a (potentially different) InstructionEquivalenceClass
/// definition to classify zero-idioms. That means, XORrr is likely to appear
/// in more than one equivalence class (where each class definition is
/// contributed by a different processor).
///
/// There is no guarantee that the same MCInstPredicate will be used to describe
/// equivalence classes that identify XORrr as a zero-idiom.
///
/// To be more specific, the requirements for being a zero-idiom XORrr may be
/// different for different processors.
///
/// Class PredicateInfo identifies a subset of processors that specify the same
/// requirements (i.e. same MCInstPredicate and OperandMask) for an instruction
/// opcode.
///
/// Back to the example. Field `ProcModelMask` will have one bit set for every
/// processor model that sees XORrr as a zero-idiom, and that specifies the same
/// set of constraints.
///
/// By construction, there can be multiple instances of PredicateInfo associated
/// with a same instruction opcode. For example, different processors may define
/// different constraints on the same opcode.
///
/// Field OperandMask can be used as an extra constraint.
/// It may be used to describe conditions that appy only to a subset of the
/// operands of a machine instruction, and the operands subset may not be the
/// same for all processor models.
struct PredicateInfo {
llvm::APInt ProcModelMask; // A set of processor model indices.
llvm::APInt OperandMask; // An operand mask.
const Record *Predicate; // MCInstrPredicate definition.
PredicateInfo(llvm::APInt CpuMask, llvm::APInt Operands, const Record *Pred)
: ProcModelMask(CpuMask), OperandMask(Operands), Predicate(Pred) {}
bool operator==(const PredicateInfo &Other) const {
return ProcModelMask == Other.ProcModelMask &&
OperandMask == Other.OperandMask && Predicate == Other.Predicate;
}
};
/// A collection of PredicateInfo objects.
///
/// There is at least one OpcodeInfo object for every opcode specified by a
/// TIPredicate definition.
class OpcodeInfo {
std::vector<PredicateInfo> Predicates;
[TableGen][SubtargetEmitter] Add the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking instructions. That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions. The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name). ``` virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return false; } virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return isZeroIdiom(MI); } ``` An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true. The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code). Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls would always return false. A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a property in common. STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence classes. Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions. Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in XXXGenSubtargetInfo. This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only. This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310). The main advantages are: - We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates. - We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via tablegen in the scheduling models. In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems. Examples of future developments are: - Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves - Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own concept of "slow" LEA). - Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies on the output registers on some processors only. It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes. For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region. This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as possible. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174 llvm-svn: 342555
2018-09-19 17:57:45 +02:00
OpcodeInfo(const OpcodeInfo &Other) = delete;
OpcodeInfo &operator=(const OpcodeInfo &Other) = delete;
public:
OpcodeInfo() = default;
OpcodeInfo &operator=(OpcodeInfo &&Other) = default;
OpcodeInfo(OpcodeInfo &&Other) = default;
ArrayRef<PredicateInfo> getPredicates() const { return Predicates; }
void addPredicateForProcModel(const llvm::APInt &CpuMask,
const llvm::APInt &OperandMask,
const Record *Predicate);
};
/// Used to group together tablegen instruction definitions that are subject
/// to a same set of constraints (identified by an instance of OpcodeInfo).
class OpcodeGroup {
OpcodeInfo Info;
std::vector<const Record *> Opcodes;
OpcodeGroup(const OpcodeGroup &Other) = delete;
OpcodeGroup &operator=(const OpcodeGroup &Other) = delete;
public:
OpcodeGroup(OpcodeInfo &&OpInfo) : Info(std::move(OpInfo)) {}
OpcodeGroup(OpcodeGroup &&Other) = default;
void addOpcode(const Record *Opcode) {
assert(std::find(Opcodes.begin(), Opcodes.end(), Opcode) == Opcodes.end() &&
"Opcode already in set!");
Opcodes.push_back(Opcode);
}
ArrayRef<const Record *> getOpcodes() const { return Opcodes; }
const OpcodeInfo &getOpcodeInfo() const { return Info; }
};
/// An STIPredicateFunction descriptor used by tablegen backends to
/// auto-generate the body of a predicate function as a member of tablegen'd
/// class XXXGenSubtargetInfo.
class STIPredicateFunction {
const Record *FunctionDeclaration;
std::vector<const Record *> Definitions;
std::vector<OpcodeGroup> Groups;
STIPredicateFunction(const STIPredicateFunction &Other) = delete;
STIPredicateFunction &operator=(const STIPredicateFunction &Other) = delete;
public:
STIPredicateFunction(const Record *Rec) : FunctionDeclaration(Rec) {}
STIPredicateFunction(STIPredicateFunction &&Other) = default;
bool isCompatibleWith(const STIPredicateFunction &Other) const {
return FunctionDeclaration == Other.FunctionDeclaration;
}
void addDefinition(const Record *Def) { Definitions.push_back(Def); }
void addOpcode(const Record *OpcodeRec, OpcodeInfo &&Info) {
if (Groups.empty() ||
Groups.back().getOpcodeInfo().getPredicates() != Info.getPredicates())
Groups.emplace_back(std::move(Info));
Groups.back().addOpcode(OpcodeRec);
}
StringRef getName() const {
return FunctionDeclaration->getValueAsString("Name");
}
const Record *getDefaultReturnPredicate() const {
return FunctionDeclaration->getValueAsDef("DefaultReturnValue");
}
const Record *getDeclaration() const { return FunctionDeclaration; }
ArrayRef<const Record *> getDefinitions() const { return Definitions; }
ArrayRef<OpcodeGroup> getGroups() const { return Groups; }
};
/// Top level container for machine model data.
class CodeGenSchedModels {
RecordKeeper &Records;
const CodeGenTarget &Target;
// Map dag expressions to Instruction lists.
SetTheory Sets;
// List of unique processor models.
std::vector<CodeGenProcModel> ProcModels;
// Map Processor's MachineModel or ProcItin to a CodeGenProcModel index.
using ProcModelMapTy = DenseMap<Record*, unsigned>;
ProcModelMapTy ProcModelMap;
// Per-operand SchedReadWrite types.
std::vector<CodeGenSchedRW> SchedWrites;
std::vector<CodeGenSchedRW> SchedReads;
// List of unique SchedClasses.
std::vector<CodeGenSchedClass> SchedClasses;
// Any inferred SchedClass has an index greater than NumInstrSchedClassses.
unsigned NumInstrSchedClasses;
RecVec ProcResourceDefs;
RecVec ProcResGroups;
// Map each instruction to its unique SchedClass index considering the
// combination of it's itinerary class, SchedRW list, and InstRW records.
using InstClassMapTy = DenseMap<Record*, unsigned>;
InstClassMapTy InstrClassMap;
[TableGen][SubtargetEmitter] Add the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking instructions. That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions. The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name). ``` virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return false; } virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return isZeroIdiom(MI); } ``` An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true. The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code). Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls would always return false. A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a property in common. STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence classes. Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions. Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in XXXGenSubtargetInfo. This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only. This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310). The main advantages are: - We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates. - We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via tablegen in the scheduling models. In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems. Examples of future developments are: - Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves - Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own concept of "slow" LEA). - Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies on the output registers on some processors only. It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes. For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region. This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as possible. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174 llvm-svn: 342555
2018-09-19 17:57:45 +02:00
std::vector<STIPredicateFunction> STIPredicates;
public:
CodeGenSchedModels(RecordKeeper& RK, const CodeGenTarget &TGT);
// iterator access to the scheduling classes.
using class_iterator = std::vector<CodeGenSchedClass>::iterator;
using const_class_iterator = std::vector<CodeGenSchedClass>::const_iterator;
class_iterator classes_begin() { return SchedClasses.begin(); }
const_class_iterator classes_begin() const { return SchedClasses.begin(); }
class_iterator classes_end() { return SchedClasses.end(); }
const_class_iterator classes_end() const { return SchedClasses.end(); }
iterator_range<class_iterator> classes() {
return make_range(classes_begin(), classes_end());
}
iterator_range<const_class_iterator> classes() const {
return make_range(classes_begin(), classes_end());
}
iterator_range<class_iterator> explicit_classes() {
return make_range(classes_begin(), classes_begin() + NumInstrSchedClasses);
}
iterator_range<const_class_iterator> explicit_classes() const {
return make_range(classes_begin(), classes_begin() + NumInstrSchedClasses);
}
Record *getModelOrItinDef(Record *ProcDef) const {
Record *ModelDef = ProcDef->getValueAsDef("SchedModel");
Record *ItinsDef = ProcDef->getValueAsDef("ProcItin");
if (!ItinsDef->getValueAsListOfDefs("IID").empty()) {
assert(ModelDef->getValueAsBit("NoModel")
&& "Itineraries must be defined within SchedMachineModel");
return ItinsDef;
}
return ModelDef;
}
const CodeGenProcModel &getModelForProc(Record *ProcDef) const {
Record *ModelDef = getModelOrItinDef(ProcDef);
ProcModelMapTy::const_iterator I = ProcModelMap.find(ModelDef);
assert(I != ProcModelMap.end() && "missing machine model");
return ProcModels[I->second];
}
CodeGenProcModel &getProcModel(Record *ModelDef) {
ProcModelMapTy::const_iterator I = ProcModelMap.find(ModelDef);
assert(I != ProcModelMap.end() && "missing machine model");
return ProcModels[I->second];
}
const CodeGenProcModel &getProcModel(Record *ModelDef) const {
return const_cast<CodeGenSchedModels*>(this)->getProcModel(ModelDef);
}
// Iterate over the unique processor models.
using ProcIter = std::vector<CodeGenProcModel>::const_iterator;
ProcIter procModelBegin() const { return ProcModels.begin(); }
ProcIter procModelEnd() const { return ProcModels.end(); }
ArrayRef<CodeGenProcModel> procModels() const { return ProcModels; }
// Return true if any processors have itineraries.
bool hasItineraries() const;
// Get a SchedWrite from its index.
const CodeGenSchedRW &getSchedWrite(unsigned Idx) const {
assert(Idx < SchedWrites.size() && "bad SchedWrite index");
assert(SchedWrites[Idx].isValid() && "invalid SchedWrite");
return SchedWrites[Idx];
}
// Get a SchedWrite from its index.
const CodeGenSchedRW &getSchedRead(unsigned Idx) const {
assert(Idx < SchedReads.size() && "bad SchedRead index");
assert(SchedReads[Idx].isValid() && "invalid SchedRead");
return SchedReads[Idx];
}
const CodeGenSchedRW &getSchedRW(unsigned Idx, bool IsRead) const {
return IsRead ? getSchedRead(Idx) : getSchedWrite(Idx);
}
CodeGenSchedRW &getSchedRW(Record *Def) {
bool IsRead = Def->isSubClassOf("SchedRead");
unsigned Idx = getSchedRWIdx(Def, IsRead);
return const_cast<CodeGenSchedRW&>(
IsRead ? getSchedRead(Idx) : getSchedWrite(Idx));
}
const CodeGenSchedRW &getSchedRW(Record *Def) const {
return const_cast<CodeGenSchedModels&>(*this).getSchedRW(Def);
}
unsigned getSchedRWIdx(const Record *Def, bool IsRead) const;
// Return true if the given write record is referenced by a ReadAdvance.
bool hasReadOfWrite(Record *WriteDef) const;
// Get a SchedClass from its index.
CodeGenSchedClass &getSchedClass(unsigned Idx) {
assert(Idx < SchedClasses.size() && "bad SchedClass index");
return SchedClasses[Idx];
}
const CodeGenSchedClass &getSchedClass(unsigned Idx) const {
assert(Idx < SchedClasses.size() && "bad SchedClass index");
return SchedClasses[Idx];
}
// Get the SchedClass index for an instruction. Instructions with no
// itinerary, no SchedReadWrites, and no InstrReadWrites references return 0
// for NoItinerary.
unsigned getSchedClassIdx(const CodeGenInstruction &Inst) const;
using SchedClassIter = std::vector<CodeGenSchedClass>::const_iterator;
SchedClassIter schedClassBegin() const { return SchedClasses.begin(); }
SchedClassIter schedClassEnd() const { return SchedClasses.end(); }
ArrayRef<CodeGenSchedClass> schedClasses() const { return SchedClasses; }
unsigned numInstrSchedClasses() const { return NumInstrSchedClasses; }
void findRWs(const RecVec &RWDefs, IdxVec &Writes, IdxVec &Reads) const;
void findRWs(const RecVec &RWDefs, IdxVec &RWs, bool IsRead) const;
void expandRWSequence(unsigned RWIdx, IdxVec &RWSeq, bool IsRead) const;
void expandRWSeqForProc(unsigned RWIdx, IdxVec &RWSeq, bool IsRead,
const CodeGenProcModel &ProcModel) const;
unsigned addSchedClass(Record *ItinDef, ArrayRef<unsigned> OperWrites,
ArrayRef<unsigned> OperReads,
ArrayRef<unsigned> ProcIndices);
unsigned findOrInsertRW(ArrayRef<unsigned> Seq, bool IsRead);
Record *findProcResUnits(Record *ProcResKind, const CodeGenProcModel &PM,
ArrayRef<SMLoc> Loc) const;
[TableGen][SubtargetEmitter] Add the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking instructions. That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions. The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name). ``` virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return false; } virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return isZeroIdiom(MI); } ``` An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true. The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code). Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls would always return false. A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a property in common. STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence classes. Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions. Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in XXXGenSubtargetInfo. This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only. This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310). The main advantages are: - We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates. - We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via tablegen in the scheduling models. In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems. Examples of future developments are: - Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves - Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own concept of "slow" LEA). - Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies on the output registers on some processors only. It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes. For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region. This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as possible. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174 llvm-svn: 342555
2018-09-19 17:57:45 +02:00
ArrayRef<STIPredicateFunction> getSTIPredicates() const {
return STIPredicates;
}
private:
void collectProcModels();
// Initialize a new processor model if it is unique.
void addProcModel(Record *ProcDef);
void collectSchedRW();
std::string genRWName(ArrayRef<unsigned> Seq, bool IsRead);
unsigned findRWForSequence(ArrayRef<unsigned> Seq, bool IsRead);
void collectSchedClasses();
void collectRetireControlUnits();
[MC][Tablegen] Allow the definition of processor register files in the scheduling model for llvm-mca This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling models. This addresses PR36662. A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td. Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify: - The total number of physical registers. - Which target registers are accessible through the register file. - The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage. Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td) def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]> Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar (btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM register definitions only cost 1 physical register. The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of physical registers". This patch is structured in two parts. * Part 1 - MC/Tablegen * A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files. Information about register files is accessible through an instance of MCExtraProcessorInfo. The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor information used by the llvm machine schedulers. I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra processor information if they don't want it. * Part 2 - llvm-mca related * The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca. The main differences are: 1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register" when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage. 2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the "maximum 32 register files" restriction. 3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra details related to each register file implemented by the processor. The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980 llvm-svn: 329067
2018-04-03 15:36:24 +02:00
void collectRegisterFiles();
void collectPfmCounters();
void collectOptionalProcessorInfo();
std::string createSchedClassName(Record *ItinClassDef,
ArrayRef<unsigned> OperWrites,
ArrayRef<unsigned> OperReads);
std::string createSchedClassName(const RecVec &InstDefs);
void createInstRWClass(Record *InstRWDef);
void collectProcItins();
void collectProcItinRW();
void collectProcUnsupportedFeatures();
void inferSchedClasses();
void checkMCInstPredicates() const;
[TableGen][SubtargetEmitter] Add the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking instructions. Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking instructions. That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions. The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name). ``` virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return false; } virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const { return isZeroIdiom(MI); } ``` An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true. The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code). Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls would always return false. A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a property in common. STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence classes. Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions. Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in XXXGenSubtargetInfo. This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only. This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310). The main advantages are: - We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates. - We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via tablegen in the scheduling models. In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems. Examples of future developments are: - Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves - Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own concept of "slow" LEA). - Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies on the output registers on some processors only. It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes. For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region. This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as possible. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174 llvm-svn: 342555
2018-09-19 17:57:45 +02:00
void checkSTIPredicates() const;
void collectSTIPredicates();
void checkCompleteness();
void inferFromRW(ArrayRef<unsigned> OperWrites, ArrayRef<unsigned> OperReads,
unsigned FromClassIdx, ArrayRef<unsigned> ProcIndices);
void inferFromItinClass(Record *ItinClassDef, unsigned FromClassIdx);
void inferFromInstRWs(unsigned SCIdx);
bool hasSuperGroup(RecVec &SubUnits, CodeGenProcModel &PM);
void verifyProcResourceGroups(CodeGenProcModel &PM);
void collectProcResources();
void collectItinProcResources(Record *ItinClassDef);
void collectRWResources(unsigned RWIdx, bool IsRead,
ArrayRef<unsigned> ProcIndices);
void collectRWResources(ArrayRef<unsigned> Writes, ArrayRef<unsigned> Reads,
ArrayRef<unsigned> ProcIndices);
void addProcResource(Record *ProcResourceKind, CodeGenProcModel &PM,
ArrayRef<SMLoc> Loc);
void addWriteRes(Record *ProcWriteResDef, unsigned PIdx);
void addReadAdvance(Record *ProcReadAdvanceDef, unsigned PIdx);
};
} // namespace llvm
#endif