2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
|
|
|
|
===================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
|
|
|
|
specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
|
|
|
|
behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
|
|
|
|
the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
|
|
|
|
(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
|
|
|
|
using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
|
|
|
|
inputs in one file in a specific order.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
|
2013-07-14 20:12:25 +02:00
|
|
|
match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
|
|
|
|
:option:`--input-file` option is used.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-06 23:07:03 +01:00
|
|
|
Options are parsed from the environment variable ``FILECHECK_OPTS``
|
|
|
|
and from the command line.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: -help
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print a summary of command line options.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-10 03:04:09 +01:00
|
|
|
FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
|
|
|
|
match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
|
|
|
|
file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
|
|
|
|
:option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
|
|
|
|
prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
|
|
|
|
change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-06-14 18:42:05 +02:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
|
|
|
|
specified as a comma separated list.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --input-file filename
|
2012-11-07 02:41:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
File to check (defaults to stdin).
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-11 17:46:09 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --match-full-lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
|
|
|
|
option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
|
|
|
|
line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
|
|
|
|
:option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
|
|
|
|
matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
|
|
|
|
``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
|
|
|
|
check pattern.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --strict-whitespace
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
|
|
|
|
tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
|
2013-02-06 21:40:38 +01:00
|
|
|
The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
|
2013-06-21 02:27:54 +02:00
|
|
|
sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-11 14:39:32 +02:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
|
|
|
|
checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
|
2014-07-21 18:39:00 +02:00
|
|
|
``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
|
2014-07-11 14:39:32 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
|
|
|
|
diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
|
|
|
|
-verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
|
|
|
|
warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-20 22:21:57 +02:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --dump-input-on-failure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the check fails, dump all of the original input.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-09 18:59:04 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --enable-var-scope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enables scope for regex variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and
|
|
|
|
remain set throughout the file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-07 14:24:44 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in
|
|
|
|
``CHECK:`` lines.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
.. option:: -version
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Show the version number of this program.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-13 05:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
.. option:: -v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print directive pattern matches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. option:: -vv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as
|
|
|
|
discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches,
|
|
|
|
and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches. Implies ``-v``.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-11 22:27:27 +02:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:``
|
|
|
|
directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience
|
|
|
|
as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:``
|
|
|
|
implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
[SourceMgr][FileCheck] Obey -color by extending WithColor
(Relands r344930, reverted in r344935, and now hopefully fixed for
Windows.)
While this change specifically targets FileCheck, it affects any tool
using the same SourceMgr facilities.
Previously, -color was documented in FileCheck's -help output, but
-color had no effect. Now, -color obeys its documentation: it forces
colors to be used in FileCheck diagnostics even when stderr is not a
terminal.
-color is especially helpful when combined with FileCheck's -v, which
can produce a long series of diagnostics that you might wish to pipe
to a pager, such as less -R. The WithColor extensions here will also
help to clean up color usage in FileCheck's annotated dump of input,
which is proposed in D52999.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53419
llvm-svn: 345202
2018-10-24 23:46:42 +02:00
|
|
|
.. option:: --color
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use colors in output (autodetected by default).
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
EXIT STATUS
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
|
|
|
|
it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
|
|
|
|
non-zero value.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TUTORIAL
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
|
|
|
|
line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
|
|
|
|
like this:
|
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 17:45:07 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
|
|
|
|
that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
|
|
|
|
means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
|
|
|
|
against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
|
|
|
|
"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
|
|
|
|
(after the RUN line):
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 17:45:07 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: sub1:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: subl
|
|
|
|
%0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: inc4:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: incq
|
|
|
|
%0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
|
|
|
|
see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
|
|
|
|
output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
|
|
|
|
verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
|
|
|
|
differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
|
|
|
|
test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
|
|
|
|
unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
|
|
|
|
else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
|
|
|
|
exists anywhere in the file.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The FileCheck -check-prefix option
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
[docs] Fixing Sphinx warnings to unclog the buildbot
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).
Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.
This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).
Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.
I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.
llvm-svn: 276109
2016-07-20 14:16:38 +02:00
|
|
|
The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
|
|
|
|
circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
|
|
|
|
:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 17:45:07 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
|
2012-06-12 02:48:47 +02:00
|
|
|
; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
|
2012-06-12 02:48:47 +02:00
|
|
|
; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
%tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
|
|
|
|
; X32: pinsrd_1:
|
|
|
|
; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; X64: pinsrd_1:
|
|
|
|
; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
|
|
|
|
both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
|
|
|
|
happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
|
|
|
|
this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
|
|
|
|
For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 17:45:07 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 02:48:47 +02:00
|
|
|
define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
|
|
|
|
%tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
|
|
|
|
%tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
|
|
|
|
%tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
|
|
|
|
<2 x double> %tmp7,
|
|
|
|
<2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
|
|
|
|
store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: t2:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
|
2012-11-21 23:40:52 +01:00
|
|
|
newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
the first directive in a file.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-05 18:00:05 +01:00
|
|
|
The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
|
|
|
|
on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
|
|
|
|
and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
|
|
|
|
check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
|
|
|
|
(described below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, the following works like you'd expect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-29 18:38:44 +02:00
|
|
|
!0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
|
2015-03-05 18:00:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-29 18:38:44 +02:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
|
2015-03-05 18:00:05 +01:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: column:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
|
|
|
|
it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
|
2018-06-26 17:15:45 +02:00
|
|
|
directive in a file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive
|
2018-06-26 17:29:09 +02:00
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2018-06-26 17:15:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace,
|
|
|
|
you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-06 03:41:25 +02:00
|
|
|
declare void @foo()
|
2018-06-26 17:15:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-06 03:41:25 +02:00
|
|
|
declare void @bar()
|
2018-06-26 17:15:45 +02:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: foo
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-EMPTY:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: bar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one
|
|
|
|
newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first
|
2015-03-05 18:00:05 +01:00
|
|
|
directive in a file.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
|
|
|
|
example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
|
|
|
|
can be used:
|
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 17:45:07 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
|
|
|
|
store i32 %V, i32* %P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
|
|
|
|
%P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%A = load i8* %P3
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %A
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: load
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: ret i8
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-13 01:46:13 +01:00
|
|
|
The "CHECK-COUNT:" directive
|
2018-11-13 02:12:19 +01:00
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2018-11-13 01:46:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to match multiple lines with the same pattern over and over again
|
|
|
|
you can repeat a plain ``CHECK:`` as many times as needed. If that looks too
|
|
|
|
boring you can instead use a counted check "``CHECK-COUNT-<num>:``", where
|
|
|
|
``<num>`` is a positive decimal number. It will match the pattern exactly
|
|
|
|
``<num>`` times, no more and no less. If you specified a custom check prefix,
|
|
|
|
just use "``<PREFIX>-COUNT-<num>:``" for the same effect.
|
|
|
|
Here is a simple example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loop at depth 1
|
|
|
|
Loop at depth 1
|
|
|
|
Loop at depth 1
|
|
|
|
Loop at depth 1
|
|
|
|
Loop at depth 2
|
|
|
|
Loop at depth 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-COUNT-6: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}}
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-14 22:34:12 +02:00
|
|
|
The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
|
|
|
|
order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
|
|
|
|
before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
|
|
|
|
vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
|
|
|
|
in the natural order:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
|
|
|
|
Foo f; // emit vtable
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
|
|
|
|
Bar b;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-11 20:50:22 +02:00
|
|
|
``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
|
|
|
|
exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
|
|
|
|
the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
|
|
|
|
occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
|
|
|
|
occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: NOT
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
|
2013-05-14 22:34:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
|
|
|
|
orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
|
|
|
|
It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
|
|
|
|
sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-11 20:50:22 +02:00
|
|
|
If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
|
|
|
|
be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, for instance, the code below will pass:
|
2013-05-14 22:34:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[docs] Fixing Sphinx warnings to unclog the buildbot
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).
Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.
This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).
Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.
I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.
llvm-svn: 276109
2016-07-20 14:16:38 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: text
|
2013-05-14 22:34:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-11 20:50:22 +02:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
|
|
|
|
vmov.32 d0[1]
|
|
|
|
vmov.32 d0[0]
|
2013-05-14 22:34:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-11 20:50:22 +02:00
|
|
|
While this other code, will not:
|
|
|
|
|
[docs] Fixing Sphinx warnings to unclog the buildbot
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).
Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.
This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).
Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.
I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.
llvm-svn: 276109
2016-07-20 14:16:38 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: text
|
2013-10-11 20:50:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
|
|
|
|
vmov.32 d1[1]
|
|
|
|
vmov.32 d0[0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
|
|
|
|
register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
|
|
|
|
use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
|
|
|
|
of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
|
|
|
|
real bugs away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
|
2013-05-14 22:34:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-11 22:27:27 +02:00
|
|
|
A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any
|
|
|
|
preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only
|
|
|
|
is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's
|
|
|
|
also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example,
|
|
|
|
the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a
|
|
|
|
parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries
|
|
|
|
as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text
|
|
|
|
of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-12 16:51:05 +02:00
|
|
|
The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
|
2013-07-30 10:26:24 +02:00
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2013-07-12 16:51:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
|
|
|
|
or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
|
|
|
|
later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
|
|
|
|
flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
|
|
|
|
actual source of the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
|
|
|
|
directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
|
2013-07-19 01:26:58 +02:00
|
|
|
directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
|
|
|
|
matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
|
|
|
|
``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
|
|
|
|
other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
|
|
|
|
the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
|
|
|
|
preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
|
2017-03-09 18:59:04 +01:00
|
|
|
If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the
|
|
|
|
beginning of the block.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-19 01:26:58 +02:00
|
|
|
For example,
|
2013-07-12 16:51:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
|
|
|
|
%0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
|
|
|
|
%call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
|
|
|
|
%1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
|
|
|
|
%call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
|
|
|
|
ret %struct.C* %this
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
|
|
|
|
``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
|
|
|
|
``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
|
2013-07-19 01:26:58 +02:00
|
|
|
the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
|
|
|
|
FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
|
|
|
|
failures to be detected in a single invocation.
|
2013-07-12 16:51:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
|
|
|
|
correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
|
|
|
|
simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-06 00:04:26 +01:00
|
|
|
All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
|
|
|
|
some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
|
|
|
|
FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
|
2017-10-13 16:02:36 +02:00
|
|
|
surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX
|
|
|
|
regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions
|
|
|
|
(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we
|
|
|
|
do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string
|
|
|
|
matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this:
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 17:45:07 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
|
|
|
|
register will be allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
|
|
|
|
visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
|
|
|
|
braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
|
|
|
|
braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FileCheck Variables
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
|
|
|
|
later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
|
2012-12-01 23:03:57 +01:00
|
|
|
but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
|
|
|
|
:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
|
|
|
|
patterns. Here is a simple example:
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 17:45:07 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: test5:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
|
2012-05-24 23:17:47 +02:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
|
|
|
|
variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
|
2012-12-01 23:03:57 +01:00
|
|
|
``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
|
|
|
|
variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
|
2017-10-13 16:02:36 +02:00
|
|
|
be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name,
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
|
2012-05-08 18:50:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-01 23:03:57 +01:00
|
|
|
:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
|
|
|
|
get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
|
|
|
|
were defined on. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: llvm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
|
|
|
|
and don't care exactly which register it is.
|
2012-11-14 20:42:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-09 18:59:04 +01:00
|
|
|
If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that
|
|
|
|
start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are
|
|
|
|
local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each
|
|
|
|
CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL.
|
|
|
|
This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected
|
|
|
|
by variables set in preceding tests.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-14 22:07:37 +01:00
|
|
|
FileCheck Expressions
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-29 20:21:02 +01:00
|
|
|
Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
|
|
|
|
match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
|
|
|
|
fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
|
|
|
|
line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
|
|
|
|
change due to text addition or deletion.
|
2012-11-14 22:07:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
|
|
|
|
``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
|
|
|
|
expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
|
|
|
|
optional integer offset).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
|
|
|
|
relative line number references, for example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
|
|
|
|
int a
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-28 01:59:00 +02:00
|
|
|
Matching Newline Characters
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
|
|
|
|
``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
|
|
|
|
|
[docs] Fixing Sphinx warnings to unclog the buildbot
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).
Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.
This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).
Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.
I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.
llvm-svn: 276109
2016-07-20 14:16:38 +02:00
|
|
|
.. code-block:: text
|
2016-06-28 01:59:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233)
|
|
|
|
DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
|
|
|
|
``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".
|