1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-23 04:52:54 +02:00
llvm-mirror/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreRegisterInfo.cpp

332 lines
11 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- XCoreRegisterInfo.cpp - XCore Register Information ----------------===//
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file contains the XCore implementation of the MRegisterInfo class.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "XCoreRegisterInfo.h"
#include "XCore.h"
#include "XCoreMachineFunctionInfo.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/BitVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineConstantPool.h"
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineModuleInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Type.h"
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetFrameLowering.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetOptions.h"
#define GET_REGINFO_TARGET_DESC
#include "XCoreGenRegisterInfo.inc"
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
using namespace llvm;
XCoreRegisterInfo::XCoreRegisterInfo()
: XCoreGenRegisterInfo(XCore::LR) {
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
}
// helper functions
static inline bool isImmUs(unsigned val) {
return val <= 11;
}
static inline bool isImmU6(unsigned val) {
return val < (1 << 6);
}
static inline bool isImmU16(unsigned val) {
return val < (1 << 16);
}
static void loadConstant(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
const TargetInstrInfo &TII,
unsigned DstReg, int64_t Value) {
MachineInstr &MI = *II;
MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent();
DebugLoc dl = MI.getDebugLoc();
if (isMask_32(Value)) {
int N = Log2_32(Value) + 1;
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::MKMSK_rus), DstReg).addImm(N);
} else if (isImmU16(Value)) {
int Opcode = isImmU6(Value) ? XCore::LDC_ru6 : XCore::LDC_lru6;
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(Opcode), DstReg).addImm(Value);
} else {
MachineConstantPool *ConstantPool = MBB.getParent()->getConstantPool();
const Constant *C = ConstantInt::get(
Type::getInt32Ty(MBB.getParent()->getFunction()->getContext()), Value);
unsigned Idx = ConstantPool->getConstantPoolIndex(C, 4);
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDWCP_lru6), DstReg)
.addConstantPoolIndex(Idx);
}
}
static void InsertFPImmInst(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
const TargetInstrInfo &TII,
unsigned Reg, unsigned FrameReg, int Offset ) {
MachineInstr &MI = *II;
MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent();
DebugLoc dl = MI.getDebugLoc();
switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
case XCore::LDWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDW_2rus), Reg)
.addReg(FrameReg)
.addImm(Offset);
break;
case XCore::STWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::STW_2rus))
.addReg(Reg, getKillRegState(MI.getOperand(0).isKill()))
.addReg(FrameReg)
.addImm(Offset);
break;
case XCore::LDAWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDAWF_l2rus), Reg)
.addReg(FrameReg)
.addImm(Offset);
break;
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected Opcode");
}
}
static void InsertFPConstInst(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
const TargetInstrInfo &TII,
unsigned Reg, unsigned FrameReg,
int Offset, RegScavenger *RS ) {
assert(RS && "requiresRegisterScavenging failed");
MachineInstr &MI = *II;
MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent();
DebugLoc dl = MI.getDebugLoc();
unsigned ScratchOffset = RS->scavengeRegister(&XCore::GRRegsRegClass, II, 0);
RS->setUsed(ScratchOffset);
loadConstant(II, TII, ScratchOffset, Offset);
switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
case XCore::LDWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDW_3r), Reg)
.addReg(FrameReg)
.addReg(ScratchOffset, RegState::Kill);
break;
case XCore::STWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::STW_l3r))
.addReg(Reg, getKillRegState(MI.getOperand(0).isKill()))
.addReg(FrameReg)
.addReg(ScratchOffset, RegState::Kill);
break;
case XCore::LDAWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDAWF_l3r), Reg)
.addReg(FrameReg)
.addReg(ScratchOffset, RegState::Kill);
break;
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected Opcode");
}
}
static void InsertSPImmInst(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
const TargetInstrInfo &TII,
unsigned Reg, int Offset) {
MachineInstr &MI = *II;
MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent();
DebugLoc dl = MI.getDebugLoc();
bool isU6 = isImmU6(Offset);
switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
int NewOpcode;
case XCore::LDWFI:
NewOpcode = (isU6) ? XCore::LDWSP_ru6 : XCore::LDWSP_lru6;
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(NewOpcode), Reg)
.addImm(Offset);
break;
case XCore::STWFI:
NewOpcode = (isU6) ? XCore::STWSP_ru6 : XCore::STWSP_lru6;
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(NewOpcode))
.addReg(Reg, getKillRegState(MI.getOperand(0).isKill()))
.addImm(Offset);
break;
case XCore::LDAWFI:
NewOpcode = (isU6) ? XCore::LDAWSP_ru6 : XCore::LDAWSP_lru6;
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(NewOpcode), Reg)
.addImm(Offset);
break;
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected Opcode");
}
}
static void InsertSPConstInst(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
const TargetInstrInfo &TII,
unsigned Reg, int Offset, RegScavenger *RS ) {
assert(RS && "requiresRegisterScavenging failed");
MachineInstr &MI = *II;
MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent();
DebugLoc dl = MI.getDebugLoc();
unsigned OpCode = MI.getOpcode();
unsigned ScratchBase;
if (OpCode==XCore::STWFI) {
ScratchBase = RS->scavengeRegister(&XCore::GRRegsRegClass, II, 0);
RS->setUsed(ScratchBase);
} else
ScratchBase = Reg;
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDAWSP_ru6), ScratchBase).addImm(0);
unsigned ScratchOffset = RS->scavengeRegister(&XCore::GRRegsRegClass, II, 0);
RS->setUsed(ScratchOffset);
loadConstant(II, TII, ScratchOffset, Offset);
switch (OpCode) {
case XCore::LDWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDW_3r), Reg)
.addReg(ScratchBase, RegState::Kill)
.addReg(ScratchOffset, RegState::Kill);
break;
case XCore::STWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::STW_l3r))
.addReg(Reg, getKillRegState(MI.getOperand(0).isKill()))
.addReg(ScratchBase, RegState::Kill)
.addReg(ScratchOffset, RegState::Kill);
break;
case XCore::LDAWFI:
BuildMI(MBB, II, dl, TII.get(XCore::LDAWF_l3r), Reg)
.addReg(ScratchBase, RegState::Kill)
.addReg(ScratchOffset, RegState::Kill);
break;
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected Opcode");
}
}
bool XCoreRegisterInfo::needsFrameMoves(const MachineFunction &MF) {
return MF.getMMI().hasDebugInfo() ||
MF.getFunction()->needsUnwindTableEntry();
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
}
const uint16_t* XCoreRegisterInfo::getCalleeSavedRegs(const MachineFunction *MF)
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
const {
static const uint16_t CalleeSavedRegs[] = {
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
XCore::R4, XCore::R5, XCore::R6, XCore::R7,
XCore::R8, XCore::R9, XCore::R10, XCore::LR,
0
};
return CalleeSavedRegs;
}
BitVector XCoreRegisterInfo::getReservedRegs(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
BitVector Reserved(getNumRegs());
const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF.getTarget().getFrameLowering();
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
Reserved.set(XCore::CP);
Reserved.set(XCore::DP);
Reserved.set(XCore::SP);
Reserved.set(XCore::LR);
if (TFI->hasFP(MF)) {
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
Reserved.set(XCore::R10);
}
return Reserved;
}
bool
XCoreRegisterInfo::requiresRegisterScavenging(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
return true;
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
}
This patch fixes a problem which arose when using the Post-RA scheduler on X86 Atom. Some of our tests failed because the tail merging part of the BranchFolding pass was creating new basic blocks which did not contain live-in information. When the anti-dependency code in the Post-RA scheduler ran, it would sometimes rename the register containing the function return value because the fact that the return value was live-in to the subsequent block had been lost. To fix this, it is necessary to run the RegisterScavenging code in the BranchFolding pass. This patch makes sure that the register scavenging code is invoked in the X86 subtarget only when post-RA scheduling is being done. Post RA scheduling in the X86 subtarget is only done for Atom. This patch adds a new function to the TargetRegisterClass to control whether or not live-ins should be preserved during branch folding. This is necessary in order for the anti-dependency optimizations done during the PostRASchedulerList pass to work properly when doing Post-RA scheduling for the X86 in general and for the Intel Atom in particular. The patch adds and invokes the new function trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of using the existing requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes BranchFolding.cpp to call trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes the all the targets that implemented requiresRegisterScavenging() to also implement trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc(). It adds an assertion in the Post RA scheduler to make sure that post RA liveness information is available when it is needed. It changes the X86 break-anti-dependencies test to use –mcpu=atom, in order to avoid running into the added assertion. Finally, this patch restores the use of anti-dependency checking (which was turned off temporarily for the 3.1 release) for Intel Atom in the Post RA scheduler. Patch by Andy Zhang! Thanks to Jakob and Anton for their reviews. llvm-svn: 155395
2012-04-23 23:39:35 +02:00
bool
XCoreRegisterInfo::trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
return true;
This patch fixes a problem which arose when using the Post-RA scheduler on X86 Atom. Some of our tests failed because the tail merging part of the BranchFolding pass was creating new basic blocks which did not contain live-in information. When the anti-dependency code in the Post-RA scheduler ran, it would sometimes rename the register containing the function return value because the fact that the return value was live-in to the subsequent block had been lost. To fix this, it is necessary to run the RegisterScavenging code in the BranchFolding pass. This patch makes sure that the register scavenging code is invoked in the X86 subtarget only when post-RA scheduling is being done. Post RA scheduling in the X86 subtarget is only done for Atom. This patch adds a new function to the TargetRegisterClass to control whether or not live-ins should be preserved during branch folding. This is necessary in order for the anti-dependency optimizations done during the PostRASchedulerList pass to work properly when doing Post-RA scheduling for the X86 in general and for the Intel Atom in particular. The patch adds and invokes the new function trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of using the existing requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes BranchFolding.cpp to call trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes the all the targets that implemented requiresRegisterScavenging() to also implement trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc(). It adds an assertion in the Post RA scheduler to make sure that post RA liveness information is available when it is needed. It changes the X86 break-anti-dependencies test to use –mcpu=atom, in order to avoid running into the added assertion. Finally, this patch restores the use of anti-dependency checking (which was turned off temporarily for the 3.1 release) for Intel Atom in the Post RA scheduler. Patch by Andy Zhang! Thanks to Jakob and Anton for their reviews. llvm-svn: 155395
2012-04-23 23:39:35 +02:00
}
bool
XCoreRegisterInfo::useFPForScavengingIndex(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
return false;
}
void
XCoreRegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
int SPAdj, unsigned FIOperandNum,
RegScavenger *RS) const {
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
assert(SPAdj == 0 && "Unexpected");
MachineInstr &MI = *II;
MachineOperand &FrameOp = MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum);
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
int FrameIndex = FrameOp.getIndex();
MachineFunction &MF = *MI.getParent()->getParent();
const TargetInstrInfo &TII = *MF.getTarget().getInstrInfo();
const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF.getTarget().getFrameLowering();
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
int Offset = MF.getFrameInfo()->getObjectOffset(FrameIndex);
int StackSize = MF.getFrameInfo()->getStackSize();
#ifndef NDEBUG
DEBUG(errs() << "\nFunction : "
<< MF.getName() << "\n");
DEBUG(errs() << "<--------->\n");
DEBUG(MI.print(errs()));
DEBUG(errs() << "FrameIndex : " << FrameIndex << "\n");
DEBUG(errs() << "FrameOffset : " << Offset << "\n");
DEBUG(errs() << "StackSize : " << StackSize << "\n");
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
#endif
Offset += StackSize;
unsigned FrameReg = getFrameRegister(MF);
// Special handling of DBG_VALUE instructions.
if (MI.isDebugValue()) {
MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).ChangeToRegister(FrameReg, false /*isDef*/);
MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + 1).ChangeToImmediate(Offset);
return;
}
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
// fold constant into offset.
Offset += MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + 1).getImm();
MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + 1).ChangeToImmediate(0);
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
assert(Offset%4 == 0 && "Misaligned stack offset");
DEBUG(errs() << "Offset : " << Offset << "\n" << "<--------->\n");
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
Offset/=4;
unsigned Reg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
assert(XCore::GRRegsRegClass.contains(Reg) && "Unexpected register operand");
if (TFI->hasFP(MF)) {
if (isImmUs(Offset))
InsertFPImmInst(II, TII, Reg, FrameReg, Offset);
else
InsertFPConstInst(II, TII, Reg, FrameReg, Offset, RS);
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
} else {
if (isImmU16(Offset))
InsertSPImmInst(II, TII, Reg, Offset);
else
InsertSPConstInst(II, TII, Reg, Offset, RS);
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
}
// Erase old instruction.
MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent();
MBB.erase(II);
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
}
unsigned XCoreRegisterInfo::getFrameRegister(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF.getTarget().getFrameLowering();
return TFI->hasFP(MF) ? XCore::R10 : XCore::SP;
2008-11-07 11:59:00 +01:00
}