1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-19 11:02:59 +02:00
llvm-mirror/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-exegesis.rst

312 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

llvm-exegesis - LLVM Machine Instruction Benchmark
==================================================
.. program:: llvm-exegesis
SYNOPSIS
--------
:program:`llvm-exegesis` [*options*]
DESCRIPTION
-----------
:program:`llvm-exegesis` is a benchmarking tool that uses information available
in LLVM to measure host machine instruction characteristics like latency,
throughput, or port decomposition.
Given an LLVM opcode name and a benchmarking mode, :program:`llvm-exegesis`
generates a code snippet that makes execution as serial (resp. as parallel) as
possible so that we can measure the latency (resp. inverse throughput/uop decomposition)
of the instruction.
The code snippet is jitted and executed on the host subtarget. The time taken
(resp. resource usage) is measured using hardware performance counters. The
result is printed out as YAML to the standard output.
The main goal of this tool is to automatically (in)validate the LLVM's TableDef
scheduling models. To that end, we also provide analysis of the results.
:program:`llvm-exegesis` can also benchmark arbitrary user-provided code
snippets.
EXAMPLE 1: benchmarking instructions
------------------------------------
Assume you have an X86-64 machine. To measure the latency of a single
instruction, run:
.. code-block:: bash
$ llvm-exegesis -mode=latency -opcode-name=ADD64rr
Measuring the uop decomposition or inverse throughput of an instruction works similarly:
.. code-block:: bash
$ llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -opcode-name=ADD64rr
$ llvm-exegesis -mode=inverse_throughput -opcode-name=ADD64rr
The output is a YAML document (the default is to write to stdout, but you can
redirect the output to a file using `-benchmarks-file`):
.. code-block:: none
---
key:
opcode_name: ADD64rr
mode: latency
config: ''
cpu_name: haswell
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 10000
measurements:
- { key: latency, value: 1.0058, debug_string: '' }
error: ''
info: 'explicit self cycles, selecting one aliasing configuration.
Snippet:
ADD64rr R8, R8, R10
'
...
To measure the latency of all instructions for the host architecture, run:
.. code-block:: bash
$ llvm-exegesis -mode=latency -opcode-index=-1
EXAMPLE 2: benchmarking a custom code snippet
---------------------------------------------
To measure the latency/uops of a custom piece of code, you can specify the
`snippets-file` option (`-` reads from standard input).
.. code-block:: bash
$ echo "vzeroupper" | llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -snippets-file=-
Real-life code snippets typically depend on registers or memory.
:program:`llvm-exegesis` checks the liveliness of registers (i.e. any register
use has a corresponding def or is a "live in"). If your code depends on the
value of some registers, you have two options:
- Mark the register as requiring a definition. :program:`llvm-exegesis` will
automatically assign a value to the register. This can be done using the
directive `LLVM-EXEGESIS-DEFREG <reg name> <hex_value>`, where `<hex_value>`
is a bit pattern used to fill `<reg_name>`. If `<hex_value>` is smaller than
the register width, it will be sign-extended.
- Mark the register as a "live in". :program:`llvm-exegesis` will benchmark
using whatever value was in this registers on entry. This can be done using
the directive `LLVM-EXEGESIS-LIVEIN <reg name>`.
For example, the following code snippet depends on the values of XMM1 (which
will be set by the tool) and the memory buffer passed in RDI (live in).
.. code-block:: none
# LLVM-EXEGESIS-LIVEIN RDI
# LLVM-EXEGESIS-DEFREG XMM1 42
vmulps (%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm2
vhaddps %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm3
addq $0x10, %rdi
EXAMPLE 3: analysis
-------------------
Assuming you have a set of benchmarked instructions (either latency or uops) as
YAML in file `/tmp/benchmarks.yaml`, you can analyze the results using the
following command:
.. code-block:: bash
$ llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis \
-benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml \
-analysis-clusters-output-file=/tmp/clusters.csv \
-analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/inconsistencies.html
This will group the instructions into clusters with the same performance
characteristics. The clusters will be written out to `/tmp/clusters.csv` in the
following format:
.. code-block:: none
cluster_id,opcode_name,config,sched_class
...
2,ADD32ri8_DB,,WriteALU,1.00
2,ADD32ri_DB,,WriteALU,1.01
2,ADD32rr,,WriteALU,1.01
2,ADD32rr_DB,,WriteALU,1.00
2,ADD32rr_REV,,WriteALU,1.00
2,ADD64i32,,WriteALU,1.01
2,ADD64ri32,,WriteALU,1.01
2,MOVSX64rr32,,BSWAP32r_BSWAP64r_MOVSX64rr32,1.00
2,VPADDQYrr,,VPADDBYrr_VPADDDYrr_VPADDQYrr_VPADDWYrr_VPSUBBYrr_VPSUBDYrr_VPSUBQYrr_VPSUBWYrr,1.02
2,VPSUBQYrr,,VPADDBYrr_VPADDDYrr_VPADDQYrr_VPADDWYrr_VPSUBBYrr_VPSUBDYrr_VPSUBQYrr_VPSUBWYrr,1.01
2,ADD64ri8,,WriteALU,1.00
2,SETBr,,WriteSETCC,1.01
...
:program:`llvm-exegesis` will also analyze the clusters to point out
inconsistencies in the scheduling information. The output is an html file. For
example, `/tmp/inconsistencies.html` will contain messages like the following :
.. image:: llvm-exegesis-analysis.png
:align: center
Note that the scheduling class names will be resolved only when
:program:`llvm-exegesis` is compiled in debug mode, else only the class id will
be shown. This does not invalidate any of the analysis results though.
OPTIONS
-------
.. option:: -help
Print a summary of command line options.
.. option:: -opcode-index=<LLVM opcode index>
Specify the opcode to measure, by index. Specifying `-1` will result
in measuring every existing opcode. See example 1 for details.
Either `opcode-index`, `opcode-name` or `snippets-file` must be set.
.. option:: -opcode-name=<opcode name 1>,<opcode name 2>,...
Specify the opcode to measure, by name. Several opcodes can be specified as
a comma-separated list. See example 1 for details.
Either `opcode-index`, `opcode-name` or `snippets-file` must be set.
.. option:: -snippets-file=<filename>
Specify the custom code snippet to measure. See example 2 for details.
Either `opcode-index`, `opcode-name` or `snippets-file` must be set.
.. option:: -mode=[latency|uops|inverse_throughput|analysis]
Specify the run mode. Note that some modes have additional requirements and options.
`latency` mode can be make use of either RDTSC or LBR.
`latency[LBR]` is only available on X86 (at least `Skylake`).
[llvm-exegesis] Loop unrolling for loop snippet repetitor mode I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday, when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model. Consider the following example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3 ... ``` What does it tell us? So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle? That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op. Now, second example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted, and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!? That's not great. And final example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000 Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x (loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof, up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle! Reviewed By: courbet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
2021-05-25 10:48:43 +02:00
To run in `latency` mode, a positive value must be specified
for `x86-lbr-sample-period` and `--repetition-mode=loop`.
In `analysis` mode, you also need to specify at least one of the
`-analysis-clusters-output-file=` and `-analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=`.
.. option:: -x86-lbr-sample-period=<nBranches/sample>
Specify the LBR sampling period - how many branches before we take a sample.
When a positive value is specified for this option and when the mode is `latency`,
we will use LBRs for measuring.
On choosing the "right" sampling period, a small value is preferred, but throttling
could occur if the sampling is too frequent. A prime number should be used to
avoid consistently skipping certain blocks.
[llvm-exegesis] Loop unrolling for loop snippet repetitor mode I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday, when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model. Consider the following example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3 ... ``` What does it tell us? So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle? That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op. Now, second example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted, and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!? That's not great. And final example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000 Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x (loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof, up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle! Reviewed By: courbet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
2021-05-25 10:48:43 +02:00
[llvm-exegesis] 'Min' repetition mode Summary: As noted in documentation, different repetition modes have different trade-offs: > .. option:: -repetition-mode=[duplicate|loop] > > Specify the repetition mode. `duplicate` will create a large, straight line > basic block with `num-repetitions` copies of the snippet. `loop` will wrap > the snippet in a loop which will be run `num-repetitions` times. The `loop` > mode tends to better hide the effects of the CPU frontend on architectures > that cache decoded instructions, but consumes a register for counting > iterations. Indeed. Example: >>! In D74156#1873657, @lebedev.ri wrote: > At least for `CMOV`, i'm seeing wildly different results > | | Latency | RThroughput | > | duplicate | 1 | 0.8 | > | loop | 2 | 0.6 | > where latency=1 seems correct, and i'd expect the througput to be close to 1/2 (since there are two execution units). This isn't great for analysis, at least for schedule model development. As discussed in excruciating detail in >>! In D74156#1924514, @gchatelet wrote: >>>! In D74156#1920632, @lebedev.ri wrote: >> ... did that explanation of the question i'm having made any sense? > > Thx for digging in the conversation ! > Ok it makes more sense now. > > I discussed it a bit with @courbet: > - We want the analysis tool to stay simple so we'd rather not make it knowledgeable of the repetition mode. > - We'd like to still be able to select either repetition mode to dig into special cases > > So we could add a third `min` repetition mode that would run both and take the minimum. It could be the default option. > Would you have some time to look what it would take to add this third mode? there appears to be an agreement that it is indeed sub-par, and that we should provide an optional, measurement (not analysis!) -time way to rectify the situation. However, the solutions isn't entirely straight-forward. We can just add an actual 'multiplexer' `MinSnippetRepetitor`, because if we just concatenate snippets produced by `DuplicateSnippetRepetitor` and `LoopSnippetRepetitor` and run+measure that, the measurement will naturally be different from what we'd get by running+measuring them separately and taking the min. ([[ https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28x%2By%29%2F2+%21%3D+min%28x%2C+y%29 | `time(D+L)/2 != min(time(D), time(L))` ]]) Also, it seems best to me to have a single snippet instead of generating a snippet per repetition mode, since the only difference here is that the loop repetition mode reserves one register for loop counter. As far as i can tell, we can either teach `BenchmarkRunner::runConfiguration()` to produce a single report given multiple repetitors (as in the patch), or do that one layer higher - don't modify `BenchmarkRunner::runConfiguration()`, produce multiple reports, don't actually print each one, but aggregate them somehow and only print the final one. Initially i've gone ahead with the latter approach, but it didn't look like a natural fit; the former (as in the diff) does seem like a better fit to me. There's also a question of the test coverage. It sure currently does work here: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --opcode-name=CMOV64rr --mode=inverse_throughput --repetition-mode=duplicate Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-8fb949.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'CMOV64rr RAX RAX R11 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RBP RBP R15 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RBX RBX RBX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RCX RCX RBX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RDI RDI R10 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RDX RDX RAX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RSI RSI RAX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R8 R8 R8 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R9 R9 RDX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R10 R10 RBX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R11 R11 R14 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R12 R12 R9 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R13 R13 R12 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R14 R14 R15 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R15 R15 R13 i_0x0' config: '' register_initial_values: - 'RAX=0x0' - 'R11=0x0' - 'EFLAGS=0x0' - 'RBP=0x0' - 'R15=0x0' - 'RBX=0x0' - 'RCX=0x0' - 'RDI=0x0' - 'R10=0x0' - 'RDX=0x0' - 'RSI=0x0' - 'R8=0x0' - 'R9=0x0' - 'R14=0x0' - 'R12=0x0' - 'R13=0x0' cpu_name: bdver2 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 10000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.819, per_snippet_value: 12.285 } error: '' info: instruction has tied variables, using static renaming. assembled_snippet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bin/llvm-exegesis --opcode-name=CMOV64rr --mode=inverse_throughput --repetition-mode=loop Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-051eb3.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'CMOV64rr RAX RAX R11 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RBP RBP RSI i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RBX RBX R9 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RCX RCX RSI i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RDI RDI RBP i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RDX RDX R9 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RSI RSI RDI i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R9 R9 R12 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R10 R10 R11 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R11 R11 R9 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R12 R12 RBP i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R13 R13 RSI i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R14 R14 R14 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R15 R15 R10 i_0x0' config: '' register_initial_values: - 'RAX=0x0' - 'R11=0x0' - 'EFLAGS=0x0' - 'RBP=0x0' - 'RSI=0x0' - 'RBX=0x0' - 'R9=0x0' - 'RCX=0x0' - 'RDI=0x0' - 'RDX=0x0' - 'R12=0x0' - 'R10=0x0' - 'R13=0x0' - 'R14=0x0' - 'R15=0x0' cpu_name: bdver2 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 10000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.6083, per_snippet_value: 8.5162 } error: '' info: instruction has tied variables, using static renaming. assembled_snippet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bin/llvm-exegesis --opcode-name=CMOV64rr --mode=inverse_throughput --repetition-mode=min Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c7a47d.o Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2581f1.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'CMOV64rr RAX RAX R11 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RBP RBP R10 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RBX RBX R10 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RCX RCX RDX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RDI RDI RAX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RDX RDX R9 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr RSI RSI RAX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R9 R9 RBX i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R10 R10 R12 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R11 R11 RDI i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R12 R12 RDI i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R13 R13 RDI i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R14 R14 R9 i_0x0' - 'CMOV64rr R15 R15 RBP i_0x0' config: '' register_initial_values: - 'RAX=0x0' - 'R11=0x0' - 'EFLAGS=0x0' - 'RBP=0x0' - 'R10=0x0' - 'RBX=0x0' - 'RCX=0x0' - 'RDX=0x0' - 'RDI=0x0' - 'R9=0x0' - 'RSI=0x0' - 'R12=0x0' - 'R13=0x0' - 'R14=0x0' - 'R15=0x0' cpu_name: bdver2 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 10000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.6073, per_snippet_value: 8.5022 } error: '' info: instruction has tied variables, using static renaming. assembled_snippet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``` but i open to suggestions as to how test that. I also have gone with the suggestion to default to this new mode. This was irking me for some time, so i'm happy to finally see progress here. Looking forward to feedback. Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet Reviewed By: courbet, gchatelet Subscribers: mstojanovic, RKSimon, llvm-commits, courbet, gchatelet Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76921
2020-04-02 08:28:35 +02:00
.. option:: -repetition-mode=[duplicate|loop|min]
Specify the repetition mode. `duplicate` will create a large, straight line
[llvm-exegesis] Loop unrolling for loop snippet repetitor mode I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday, when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model. Consider the following example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3 ... ``` What does it tell us? So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle? That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op. Now, second example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted, and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!? That's not great. And final example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000 Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x (loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof, up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle! Reviewed By: courbet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
2021-05-25 10:48:43 +02:00
basic block with `num-repetitions` instructions (repeating the snippet
`num-repetitions`/`snippet size` times). `loop` will, optionally, duplicate the
snippet until the loop body contains at least `loop-body-size` instructions,
and then wrap the result in a loop which will execute `num-repetitions`
instructions (thus, again, repeating the snippet
`num-repetitions`/`snippet size` times). The `loop` mode, especially with loop
unrolling tends to better hide the effects of the CPU frontend on architectures
that cache decoded instructions, but consumes a register for counting
[llvm-exegesis] Loop unrolling for loop snippet repetitor mode I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday, when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model. Consider the following example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3 ... ``` What does it tell us? So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle? That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op. Now, second example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted, and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!? That's not great. And final example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000 Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x (loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof, up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle! Reviewed By: courbet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
2021-05-25 10:48:43 +02:00
iterations. If performing an analysis over many opcodes, it may be best to
instead use the `min` mode, which will run each other mode,
and produce the minimal measured result.
.. option:: -num-repetitions=<Number of repetitions>
[llvm-exegesis] Loop unrolling for loop snippet repetitor mode I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday, when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model. Consider the following example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3 ... ``` What does it tell us? So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle? That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op. Now, second example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted, and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!? That's not great. And final example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000 Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x (loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof, up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle! Reviewed By: courbet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
2021-05-25 10:48:43 +02:00
Specify the target number of executed instructions. Note that the actual
repetition count of the snippet will be `num-repetitions`/`snippet size`.
Higher values lead to more accurate measurements but lengthen the benchmark.
[llvm-exegesis] Loop unrolling for loop snippet repetitor mode I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday, when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model. Consider the following example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3 ... ``` What does it tell us? So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle? That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op. Now, second example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted, and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!? That's not great. And final example: ``` $ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000 Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o --- mode: inverse_throughput key: instructions: - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0' config: '' register_initial_values: [] cpu_name: znver3 llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu num_repetitions: 1000000 measurements: - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 } error: '' info: '' assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3 ... ``` So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x (loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof, up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle! Reviewed By: courbet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
2021-05-25 10:48:43 +02:00
.. option:: -loop-body-size=<Preferred loop body size>
Only effective for `-repetition-mode=[loop|min]`.
Instead of looping over the snippet directly, first duplicate it so that the
loop body contains at least this many instructions. This potentially results
in loop body being cached in the CPU Op Cache / Loop Cache, which allows to
which may have higher throughput than the CPU decoders.
.. option:: -max-configs-per-opcode=<value>
Specify the maximum configurations that can be generated for each opcode.
By default this is `1`, meaning that we assume that a single measurement is
enough to characterize an opcode. This might not be true of all instructions:
for example, the performance characteristics of the LEA instruction on X86
depends on the value of assigned registers and immediates. Setting a value of
`-max-configs-per-opcode` larger than `1` allows `llvm-exegesis` to explore
more configurations to discover if some register or immediate assignments
lead to different performance characteristics.
.. option:: -benchmarks-file=</path/to/file>
File to read (`analysis` mode) or write (`latency`/`uops`/`inverse_throughput`
modes) benchmark results. "-" uses stdin/stdout.
.. option:: -analysis-clusters-output-file=</path/to/file>
If provided, write the analysis clusters as CSV to this file. "-" prints to
stdout. By default, this analysis is not run.
.. option:: -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=</path/to/file>
If non-empty, write inconsistencies found during analysis to this file. `-`
prints to stdout. By default, this analysis is not run.
[llvm-exegesis] Introduce a 'naive' clustering algorithm (PR40880) Summary: This is an alternative to D59539. Let's suppose we have measured 4 different opcodes, and got: `0.5`, `1.0`, `1.5`, `2.0`. Let's suppose we are using `-analysis-clustering-epsilon=0.5`. By default now we will start processing the `0.5` point, find that `1.0` is it's neighbor, add them to a new cluster. Then we will notice that `1.5` is a neighbor of `1.0` and add it to that same cluster. Then we will notice that `2.0` is a neighbor of `1.5` and add it to that same cluster. So all these points ended up in the same cluster. This may or may not be a correct implementation of dbscan clustering algorithm. But this is rather horribly broken for the reasons of comparing the clusters with the LLVM sched data. Let's suppose all those opcodes are currently in the same sched cluster. If i specify `-analysis-inconsistency-epsilon=0.5`, then no matter the LLVM values this cluster will **never** match the LLVM values, and thus this cluster will **always** be displayed as inconsistent. The solution is obviously to split off some of these opcodes into different sched cluster. But how do i do that? Out of 4 opcodes displayed in the inconsistency report, which ones are the "bad ones"? Which ones are the most different from the checked-in data? I'd need to go in to the `.yaml` and look it up manually. The trivial solution is to, when creating clusters, don't use the full dbscan algorithm, but instead "pick some unclustered point, pick all unclustered points that are it's neighbor, put them all into a new cluster, repeat". And just so as it happens, we can arrive at that algorithm by not performing the "add neighbors of a neighbor to the cluster" step. But that won't work well once we teach analyze mode to operate in on-1D mode (i.e. on more than a single measurement type at a time), because the clustering would depend on the order of the measurements. Instead, let's just create a single cluster per opcode, and put all the points of that opcode into said cluster. And simultaneously check that every point in that cluster is a neighbor of every other point in the cluster, and if they are not, the cluster (==opcode) is unstable. This is //yet another// step to bring me closer to being able to continue cleanup of bdver2 sched model.. Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40880 | PR40880 ]]. Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet Reviewed By: courbet Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, RKSimon, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59820 llvm-svn: 357152
2019-03-28 09:55:01 +01:00
.. option:: -analysis-clustering=[dbscan,naive]
Specify the clustering algorithm to use. By default DBSCAN will be used.
Naive clustering algorithm is better for doing further work on the
`-analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=` output, it will create one cluster
per opcode, and check that the cluster is stable (all points are neighbours).
.. option:: -analysis-numpoints=<dbscan numPoints parameter>
Specify the numPoints parameters to be used for DBSCAN clustering
[llvm-exegesis] Introduce a 'naive' clustering algorithm (PR40880) Summary: This is an alternative to D59539. Let's suppose we have measured 4 different opcodes, and got: `0.5`, `1.0`, `1.5`, `2.0`. Let's suppose we are using `-analysis-clustering-epsilon=0.5`. By default now we will start processing the `0.5` point, find that `1.0` is it's neighbor, add them to a new cluster. Then we will notice that `1.5` is a neighbor of `1.0` and add it to that same cluster. Then we will notice that `2.0` is a neighbor of `1.5` and add it to that same cluster. So all these points ended up in the same cluster. This may or may not be a correct implementation of dbscan clustering algorithm. But this is rather horribly broken for the reasons of comparing the clusters with the LLVM sched data. Let's suppose all those opcodes are currently in the same sched cluster. If i specify `-analysis-inconsistency-epsilon=0.5`, then no matter the LLVM values this cluster will **never** match the LLVM values, and thus this cluster will **always** be displayed as inconsistent. The solution is obviously to split off some of these opcodes into different sched cluster. But how do i do that? Out of 4 opcodes displayed in the inconsistency report, which ones are the "bad ones"? Which ones are the most different from the checked-in data? I'd need to go in to the `.yaml` and look it up manually. The trivial solution is to, when creating clusters, don't use the full dbscan algorithm, but instead "pick some unclustered point, pick all unclustered points that are it's neighbor, put them all into a new cluster, repeat". And just so as it happens, we can arrive at that algorithm by not performing the "add neighbors of a neighbor to the cluster" step. But that won't work well once we teach analyze mode to operate in on-1D mode (i.e. on more than a single measurement type at a time), because the clustering would depend on the order of the measurements. Instead, let's just create a single cluster per opcode, and put all the points of that opcode into said cluster. And simultaneously check that every point in that cluster is a neighbor of every other point in the cluster, and if they are not, the cluster (==opcode) is unstable. This is //yet another// step to bring me closer to being able to continue cleanup of bdver2 sched model.. Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40880 | PR40880 ]]. Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet Reviewed By: courbet Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, RKSimon, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59820 llvm-svn: 357152
2019-03-28 09:55:01 +01:00
(`analysis` mode, DBSCAN only).
[llvm-exegesis] Split Epsilon param into two (PR40787) Summary: This eps param is used for two distinct things: * initial point clusterization * checking clusters against the llvm values What if one wants to only look at highly different clusters, without changing the clustering itself? In particular, this helps to weed out noisy measurements (since the clusterization epsilon is still small, so there is a better chance that noisy measurements from the same opcode will go into different clusters) By splitting it into two params it is now possible. This is nearly-free performance-wise: Old: ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 10099 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs): 390.01 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.25% ) 12 context-switches # 31.735 M/sec ( +- 27.38% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 4745 page-faults # 12183.732 M/sec ( +- 0.54% ) 1562711900 cycles # 4012303.327 GHz ( +- 0.24% ) (82.90%) 185567822 stalled-cycles-frontend # 11.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.52% ) (83.30%) 392106234 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.31% ) (33.79%) 1839236666 instructions # 1.18 insn per cycle # 0.21 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.15% ) (50.37%) 407035764 branches # 1045074878.710 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (66.80%) 10896459 branch-misses # 2.68% of all branches ( +- 0.17% ) (83.20%) 0.390629 +- 0.000972 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% ) ``` ``` $ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 50572 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (9 runs): 6803.36 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.96% ) 262 context-switches # 38.546 M/sec ( +- 23.06% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.065 M/sec ( +- 76.03% ) 13287 page-faults # 1953.206 M/sec ( +- 0.32% ) 27252537904 cycles # 4006024.257 GHz ( +- 0.95% ) (83.31%) 1496314935 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.49% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.97% ) (83.32%) 16128404524 stalled-cycles-backend # 59.18% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.30% ) (33.37%) 17611143370 instructions # 0.65 insn per cycle # 0.92 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.04%) 3894906599 branches # 572537147.437 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%) 116314514 branch-misses # 2.99% of all branches ( +- 0.20% ) (83.35%) 6.8118 +- 0.0689 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.01%) ``` New: ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 10099 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (25 runs): 400.14 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.66% ) 12 context-switches # 29.429 M/sec ( +- 25.95% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.100 M/sec ( +-100.00% ) 4714 page-faults # 11796.496 M/sec ( +- 0.55% ) 1603131306 cycles # 4011840.105 GHz ( +- 0.66% ) (82.85%) 199538509 stalled-cycles-frontend # 12.45% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.40% ) (83.10%) 402249109 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.19% ) (34.05%) 1847783963 instructions # 1.15 insn per cycle # 0.22 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.18% ) (50.64%) 407162722 branches # 1018925730.631 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (67.02%) 10932779 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.51% ) (83.28%) 0.40077 +- 0.00267 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.67% ) lebedevri@pini-pini:/build/llvm-build-Clang-release$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 50572 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (9 runs): 6947.79 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.90% ) 217 context-switches # 31.236 M/sec ( +- 36.16% ) 1 cpu-migrations # 0.096 M/sec ( +- 50.00% ) 13258 page-faults # 1908.389 M/sec ( +- 0.34% ) 27830796523 cycles # 4006032.286 GHz ( +- 0.89% ) (83.30%) 1504554006 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.41% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.10% ) (83.32%) 16716574843 stalled-cycles-backend # 60.07% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.65% ) (33.38%) 17755545931 instructions # 0.64 insn per cycle # 0.94 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.09% ) (50.04%) 3897255686 branches # 560980426.597 M/sec ( +- 0.06% ) (66.70%) 117045395 branch-misses # 3.00% of all branches ( +- 0.47% ) (83.34%) 6.9507 +- 0.0627 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.90% ) ``` I.e. it's +2.6% slowdown for one whole sweep, or +2% for 5 whole sweeps. Within noise i'd say. Should help with [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40787 | PR40787 ]]. Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet Reviewed By: courbet Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58476 llvm-svn: 354767
2019-02-25 10:36:12 +01:00
.. option:: -analysis-clustering-epsilon=<dbscan epsilon parameter>
[llvm-exegesis] Split Epsilon param into two (PR40787) Summary: This eps param is used for two distinct things: * initial point clusterization * checking clusters against the llvm values What if one wants to only look at highly different clusters, without changing the clustering itself? In particular, this helps to weed out noisy measurements (since the clusterization epsilon is still small, so there is a better chance that noisy measurements from the same opcode will go into different clusters) By splitting it into two params it is now possible. This is nearly-free performance-wise: Old: ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 10099 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs): 390.01 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.25% ) 12 context-switches # 31.735 M/sec ( +- 27.38% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 4745 page-faults # 12183.732 M/sec ( +- 0.54% ) 1562711900 cycles # 4012303.327 GHz ( +- 0.24% ) (82.90%) 185567822 stalled-cycles-frontend # 11.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.52% ) (83.30%) 392106234 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.31% ) (33.79%) 1839236666 instructions # 1.18 insn per cycle # 0.21 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.15% ) (50.37%) 407035764 branches # 1045074878.710 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (66.80%) 10896459 branch-misses # 2.68% of all branches ( +- 0.17% ) (83.20%) 0.390629 +- 0.000972 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% ) ``` ``` $ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 50572 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (9 runs): 6803.36 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.96% ) 262 context-switches # 38.546 M/sec ( +- 23.06% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.065 M/sec ( +- 76.03% ) 13287 page-faults # 1953.206 M/sec ( +- 0.32% ) 27252537904 cycles # 4006024.257 GHz ( +- 0.95% ) (83.31%) 1496314935 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.49% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.97% ) (83.32%) 16128404524 stalled-cycles-backend # 59.18% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.30% ) (33.37%) 17611143370 instructions # 0.65 insn per cycle # 0.92 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.04%) 3894906599 branches # 572537147.437 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%) 116314514 branch-misses # 2.99% of all branches ( +- 0.20% ) (83.35%) 6.8118 +- 0.0689 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.01%) ``` New: ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 10099 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (25 runs): 400.14 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.66% ) 12 context-switches # 29.429 M/sec ( +- 25.95% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.100 M/sec ( +-100.00% ) 4714 page-faults # 11796.496 M/sec ( +- 0.55% ) 1603131306 cycles # 4011840.105 GHz ( +- 0.66% ) (82.85%) 199538509 stalled-cycles-frontend # 12.45% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.40% ) (83.10%) 402249109 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.19% ) (34.05%) 1847783963 instructions # 1.15 insn per cycle # 0.22 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.18% ) (50.64%) 407162722 branches # 1018925730.631 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (67.02%) 10932779 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.51% ) (83.28%) 0.40077 +- 0.00267 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.67% ) lebedevri@pini-pini:/build/llvm-build-Clang-release$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 50572 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (9 runs): 6947.79 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.90% ) 217 context-switches # 31.236 M/sec ( +- 36.16% ) 1 cpu-migrations # 0.096 M/sec ( +- 50.00% ) 13258 page-faults # 1908.389 M/sec ( +- 0.34% ) 27830796523 cycles # 4006032.286 GHz ( +- 0.89% ) (83.30%) 1504554006 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.41% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.10% ) (83.32%) 16716574843 stalled-cycles-backend # 60.07% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.65% ) (33.38%) 17755545931 instructions # 0.64 insn per cycle # 0.94 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.09% ) (50.04%) 3897255686 branches # 560980426.597 M/sec ( +- 0.06% ) (66.70%) 117045395 branch-misses # 3.00% of all branches ( +- 0.47% ) (83.34%) 6.9507 +- 0.0627 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.90% ) ``` I.e. it's +2.6% slowdown for one whole sweep, or +2% for 5 whole sweeps. Within noise i'd say. Should help with [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40787 | PR40787 ]]. Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet Reviewed By: courbet Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58476 llvm-svn: 354767
2019-02-25 10:36:12 +01:00
Specify the epsilon parameter used for clustering of benchmark points
(`analysis` mode).
[llvm-exegesis] Split Epsilon param into two (PR40787) Summary: This eps param is used for two distinct things: * initial point clusterization * checking clusters against the llvm values What if one wants to only look at highly different clusters, without changing the clustering itself? In particular, this helps to weed out noisy measurements (since the clusterization epsilon is still small, so there is a better chance that noisy measurements from the same opcode will go into different clusters) By splitting it into two params it is now possible. This is nearly-free performance-wise: Old: ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 10099 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs): 390.01 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.25% ) 12 context-switches # 31.735 M/sec ( +- 27.38% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 4745 page-faults # 12183.732 M/sec ( +- 0.54% ) 1562711900 cycles # 4012303.327 GHz ( +- 0.24% ) (82.90%) 185567822 stalled-cycles-frontend # 11.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.52% ) (83.30%) 392106234 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.31% ) (33.79%) 1839236666 instructions # 1.18 insn per cycle # 0.21 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.15% ) (50.37%) 407035764 branches # 1045074878.710 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (66.80%) 10896459 branch-misses # 2.68% of all branches ( +- 0.17% ) (83.20%) 0.390629 +- 0.000972 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% ) ``` ``` $ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 50572 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (9 runs): 6803.36 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.96% ) 262 context-switches # 38.546 M/sec ( +- 23.06% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.065 M/sec ( +- 76.03% ) 13287 page-faults # 1953.206 M/sec ( +- 0.32% ) 27252537904 cycles # 4006024.257 GHz ( +- 0.95% ) (83.31%) 1496314935 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.49% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.97% ) (83.32%) 16128404524 stalled-cycles-backend # 59.18% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.30% ) (33.37%) 17611143370 instructions # 0.65 insn per cycle # 0.92 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.04%) 3894906599 branches # 572537147.437 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%) 116314514 branch-misses # 2.99% of all branches ( +- 0.20% ) (83.35%) 6.8118 +- 0.0689 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.01%) ``` New: ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 10099 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (25 runs): 400.14 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.66% ) 12 context-switches # 29.429 M/sec ( +- 25.95% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.100 M/sec ( +-100.00% ) 4714 page-faults # 11796.496 M/sec ( +- 0.55% ) 1603131306 cycles # 4011840.105 GHz ( +- 0.66% ) (82.85%) 199538509 stalled-cycles-frontend # 12.45% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.40% ) (83.10%) 402249109 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.19% ) (34.05%) 1847783963 instructions # 1.15 insn per cycle # 0.22 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.18% ) (50.64%) 407162722 branches # 1018925730.631 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (67.02%) 10932779 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.51% ) (83.28%) 0.40077 +- 0.00267 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.67% ) lebedevri@pini-pini:/build/llvm-build-Clang-release$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 50572 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html' ... Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (9 runs): 6947.79 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.90% ) 217 context-switches # 31.236 M/sec ( +- 36.16% ) 1 cpu-migrations # 0.096 M/sec ( +- 50.00% ) 13258 page-faults # 1908.389 M/sec ( +- 0.34% ) 27830796523 cycles # 4006032.286 GHz ( +- 0.89% ) (83.30%) 1504554006 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.41% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.10% ) (83.32%) 16716574843 stalled-cycles-backend # 60.07% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.65% ) (33.38%) 17755545931 instructions # 0.64 insn per cycle # 0.94 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.09% ) (50.04%) 3897255686 branches # 560980426.597 M/sec ( +- 0.06% ) (66.70%) 117045395 branch-misses # 3.00% of all branches ( +- 0.47% ) (83.34%) 6.9507 +- 0.0627 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.90% ) ``` I.e. it's +2.6% slowdown for one whole sweep, or +2% for 5 whole sweeps. Within noise i'd say. Should help with [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40787 | PR40787 ]]. Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet Reviewed By: courbet Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58476 llvm-svn: 354767
2019-02-25 10:36:12 +01:00
.. option:: -analysis-inconsistency-epsilon=<epsilon>
Specify the epsilon parameter used for detection of when the cluster
is different from the LLVM schedule profile values (`analysis` mode).
[llvm-exegesis] Opcode stabilization / reclusterization (PR40715) Summary: Given an instruction `Opcode`, we can make benchmarks (measurements) of the instruction characteristics/performance. Then, to facilitate further analysis we group the benchmarks with *similar* characteristics into clusters. Now, this is all not entirely deterministic. Some instructions have variable characteristics, depending on their arguments. And thus, if we do several benchmarks of the same instruction `Opcode`, we may end up with *different* performance characteristics measurements. And when we then do clustering, these several benchmarks of the same instruction `Opcode` may end up being clustered into *different* clusters. This is not great for further analysis. We shall find every `Opcode` with benchmarks not in just one cluster, and move *all* the benchmarks of said `Opcode` into one new unstable cluster per `Opcode`. I have solved this by making `ClusterId` a bit field, adding a `IsUnstable` bit, and introducing `-analysis-display-unstable-clusters` switch to toggle between displaying stable-only clusters and unstable-only clusters. The reclusterization is deterministically stable, produces identical reports between runs. (Or at least that is what i'm seeing, maybe it isn't) Timings/comparisons: old (current trunk/head) {F8303582} ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' ... no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html' Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs): 6624.73 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.53% ) 172 context-switches # 25.965 M/sec ( +- 29.89% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.042 M/sec ( +- 56.54% ) 31073 page-faults # 4690.754 M/sec ( +- 0.08% ) 26538711696 cycles # 4006230.292 GHz ( +- 0.53% ) (83.31%) 2017496807 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.60% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.93% ) (83.32%) 13403650062 stalled-cycles-backend # 50.51% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.33% ) (33.37%) 19770706799 instructions # 0.74 insn per cycle # 0.68 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.04%) 4419821812 branches # 667207369.714 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%) 121741669 branch-misses # 2.75% of all branches ( +- 0.28% ) (83.34%) 6.6283 +- 0.0358 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.54% ) ``` patch, with reclustering but without filtering (i.e. outputting all the stable *and* unstable clusters) {F8303586} ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-all.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-all.html' ... no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-all.html' Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-all.html' (25 runs): 6475.29 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.31% ) 213 context-switches # 32.952 M/sec ( +- 23.81% ) 1 cpu-migrations # 0.130 M/sec ( +- 43.84% ) 31287 page-faults # 4832.057 M/sec ( +- 0.08% ) 25939086577 cycles # 4006160.279 GHz ( +- 0.31% ) (83.31%) 1958812858 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.55% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.68% ) (83.32%) 13218961512 stalled-cycles-backend # 50.96% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.29% ) (33.37%) 19752995402 instructions # 0.76 insn per cycle # 0.67 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.04%) 4417079244 branches # 682195472.305 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.70%) 121510065 branch-misses # 2.75% of all branches ( +- 0.19% ) (83.34%) 6.4832 +- 0.0229 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.35% ) ``` Funnily, *this* measurement shows that said reclustering actually improved performance. patch, with reclustering, only the stable clusters {F8303594} ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html' ... no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html' Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html' (25 runs): 6387.71 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.13% ) 133 context-switches # 20.792 M/sec ( +- 23.39% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.063 M/sec ( +- 61.24% ) 31318 page-faults # 4903.256 M/sec ( +- 0.08% ) 25591984967 cycles # 4006786.266 GHz ( +- 0.13% ) (83.31%) 1881234904 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.35% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.25% ) (83.33%) 13209749965 stalled-cycles-backend # 51.62% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.16% ) (33.36%) 19767554347 instructions # 0.77 insn per cycle # 0.67 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.03%) 4417480305 branches # 691618858.046 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.68%) 118676358 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.07% ) (83.33%) 6.3954 +- 0.0118 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.18% ) ``` Performance improved even further?! Makes sense i guess, less clusters to print. patch, with reclustering, only the unstable clusters {F8303601} ``` $ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html -analysis-display-unstable-clusters no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html' ... no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default Parsed 43970 benchmark points Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html' Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html -analysis-display-unstable-clusters' (25 runs): 6124.96 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.20% ) 194 context-switches # 31.709 M/sec ( +- 20.46% ) 0 cpu-migrations # 0.039 M/sec ( +- 49.77% ) 31413 page-faults # 5129.261 M/sec ( +- 0.06% ) 24536794267 cycles # 4006425.858 GHz ( +- 0.19% ) (83.31%) 1676085087 stalled-cycles-frontend # 6.83% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.46% ) (83.32%) 13035595603 stalled-cycles-backend # 53.13% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.16% ) (33.36%) 18260877653 instructions # 0.74 insn per cycle # 0.71 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.03%) 4112411983 branches # 671484364.603 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.68%) 114066929 branch-misses # 2.77% of all branches ( +- 0.11% ) (83.32%) 6.1278 +- 0.0121 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.20% ) ``` This tells us that the actual `-analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=` outputting only takes ~0.4 sec for 43970 benchmark points (3 whole sweeps) (Also, wow this is fast, it used to take several minutes originally) Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40715 | PR40715 ]]. Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet Reviewed By: courbet Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, llvm-commits, RKSimon Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58355 llvm-svn: 354441
2019-02-20 10:14:04 +01:00
.. option:: -analysis-display-unstable-clusters
If there is more than one benchmark for an opcode, said benchmarks may end up
not being clustered into the same cluster if the measured performance
characteristics are different. by default all such opcodes are filtered out.
This flag will instead show only such unstable opcodes.
.. option:: -ignore-invalid-sched-class=false
If set, ignore instructions that do not have a sched class (class idx = 0).
.. option:: -mcpu=<cpu name>
If set, measure the cpu characteristics using the counters for this CPU. This
is useful when creating new sched models (the host CPU is unknown to LLVM).
.. option:: --dump-object-to-disk=true
By default, llvm-exegesis will dump the generated code to a temporary file to
enable code inspection. You may disable it to speed up the execution and save
disk space.
EXIT STATUS
-----------
:program:`llvm-exegesis` returns 0 on success. Otherwise, an error message is
printed to standard error, and the tool returns a non 0 value.