RPCS3/llvm-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-22 18:54:02 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
9770d34891
llvm-mirror/test/Other/opt-O3-pipeline.ll

341 lines
15 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

[NewPM] Pin various tests under Other/ to legacy PM These all are legacy PM-specific or have a corresponding NPM RUN line. Reviewed By: ychen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86124
2020-08-18 02:48:04 +02:00
; RUN: opt -enable-new-pm=0 -mtriple=x86_64-- -O3 -debug-pass=Structure < %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,%llvmcheckext %s
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; REQUIRES: asserts
; CHECK-LABEL: Pass Arguments:
; CHECK-NEXT: Target Transform Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Type-Based Alias Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Scoped NoAlias Alias Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Assumption Cache Tracker
; CHECK-NEXT: Target Library Information
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Module Verifier
Generalize the pass registration mechanism used by Polly to any third-party tool There's quite a lot of references to Polly in the LLVM CMake codebase. However the registration pattern used by Polly could be useful to other external projects: thanks to that mechanism it would be possible to develop LLVM extension without touching the LLVM code base. This patch has two effects: 1. Remove all code specific to Polly in the llvm/clang codebase, replaicing it with a generic mechanism 2. Provide a generic mechanism to register compiler extensions. A compiler extension is similar to a pass plugin, with the notable difference that the compiler extension can be configured to be built dynamically (like plugins) or statically (like regular passes). As a result, people willing to add extra passes to clang/opt can do it using a separate code repo, but still have their pass be linked in clang/opt as built-in passes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61446
2019-06-08 17:37:47 +02:00
; CHECK-EXT: Good Bye World Pass
; CHECK-NOEXT-NOT: Good Bye World Pass
[PassManager][PhaseOrdering] lower expects before running simplifyCFG Retry of 330619a3a623 that includes a clang test update. Original commit message: If we run passes before lowering llvm.expect intrinsics to metadata, then those passes have no way to act on the hints provided by llvm.expect. SimplifyCFG is the known offender, and we made it smarter about profile metadata in D98898 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98898>. In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49336 , this means we were ignoring the recommended method for a programmer to tell the compiler that a compare+branch is expensive. This change appears to solve that case - the metadata survives to the backend, the compare order is as expected in IR, and the backend does not do anything to reverse it. We make the same change to the old pass manager to keep things synchronized. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100213
2021-04-12 20:51:51 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Lower 'expect' Intrinsics
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: SROA
; CHECK-NEXT: Early CSE
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass Arguments:
; CHECK-NEXT: Target Library Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Target Transform Information
[test] Try to unbreak hexagon bots after r328160. llvm-svn: 328167
2018-03-21 23:57:33 +01:00
; Target Pass Configuration
; CHECK: Type-Based Alias Analysis
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Scoped NoAlias Alias Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Assumption Cache Tracker
; CHECK-NEXT: Profile summary info
; CHECK-NEXT: ModulePass Manager
Add pass to add !annotate metadata from @llvm.global.annotations. This patch adds a new pass to add !annotation metadata for entries in @llvm.global.anotations, which is generated using __attribute__((annotate("_name"))) on functions in Clang. This has been discussed on llvm-dev as part of RFC: Combining Annotation Metadata and Remarks http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146393.html Reviewed By: thegameg Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91195
2020-11-16 10:49:04 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Annotation2Metadata
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Force set function attributes
; CHECK-NEXT: Infer set function attributes
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
Recommit r346483: [CallSiteSplitting] Only record conditions up to the IDom(call site). The underlying problem causing the expensive-check failure was fixed in rL346769. llvm-svn: 346843
2018-11-14 11:04:30 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Call-site splitting
; CHECK-NEXT: Interprocedural Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation
[LegacyPM] Fix pass structure dumping If module pass uses on-demand function analyses then structure is being displayed incorrectly because FunctionPassManagerImpl can't dump contained FPPassManager instances. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69315
2019-11-01 12:43:51 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Called Value Propagation
; CHECK-NEXT: Global Variable Optimizer
[LegacyPM] Fix pass structure dumping If module pass uses on-demand function analyses then structure is being displayed incorrectly because FunctionPassManagerImpl can't dump contained FPPassManager instances. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69315
2019-11-01 12:43:51 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
[BPI][NFC] Reuse post dominantor tree from analysis manager when available Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager. Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban Reviewed By: skatkov Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
2020-04-28 11:31:20 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
[LegacyPM] Fix pass structure dumping If module pass uses on-demand function analyses then structure is being displayed incorrectly because FunctionPassManagerImpl can't dump contained FPPassManager instances. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69315
2019-11-01 12:43:51 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Promote Memory to Register
; CHECK-NEXT: Dead Argument Elimination
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
; CHECK-NEXT: CallGraph Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Globals Alias Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Call Graph SCC Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Remove unused exception handling info
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Integration/Inlining
[OpenMP] Introduce the OpenMPOpt transformation pass The OpenMPOpt pass is a CGSCC pass in which OpenMP specific optimizations can reside. The OpenMPOpt pass uses the OpenMPKinds.def file to identify runtime calls and their uses. This allows targeted transformations and eases their implementation. This initial patch deduplicates `__kmpc_global_thread_num` and `omp_get_thread_num` calls. We can also identify arguments that are equivalent to such a call result and use it instead. Later we can determine "gtid" arguments based on the use in kernel functions etc. Reviewed By: JonChesterfield Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69930
2019-11-07 06:20:06 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: OpenMP specific optimizations
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Deduce function attributes
; CHECK-NEXT: Promote 'by reference' arguments to scalars
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: SROA
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Memory SSA
; CHECK-NEXT: Early CSE w/ MemorySSA
; CHECK-NEXT: Speculatively execute instructions if target has divergent branches
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Value Information Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Jump Threading
; CHECK-NEXT: Value Propagation
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine pattern based expressions
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Conditionally eliminate dead library calls
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
[BPI][NFC] Reuse post dominantor tree from analysis manager when available Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager. Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban Reviewed By: skatkov Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
2020-04-28 11:31:20 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: PGOMemOPSize
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Tail Call Elimination
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
; CHECK-NEXT: Reassociate expressions
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
[PassManager] Run additional LICM before LoopRotate Loop rotation often has to perform code duplication from header into preheader, which introduces PHI nodes. >>! In D99204, @thopre wrote: > > With loop peeling, it is important that unnecessary PHIs be avoided or > it will leads to spurious peeling. One source of such PHIs is loop > rotation which creates PHIs for invariant loads. Those PHIs are > particularly problematic since loop peeling is now run as part of simple > loop unrolling before GVN is run, and are thus a source of spurious > peeling. > > Note that while some of the load can be hoisted and eventually > eliminated by instruction combine, this is not always possible due to > alignment issue. In particular, the motivating example [1] was a load > inside a class instance which cannot be hoisted because the `this' > pointer has an alignment of 1. > > [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210312/4ce73c47/attachment.cpp Now, we could enhance LoopRotate to avoid duplicating code when not needed, but instead hoist loop-invariant code, but isn't that a code duplication? (*sic*) We have LICM, and in fact we already run it right after LoopRotation. We could try to move it to before LoopRotation, that is basically free from compile-time perspective: https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=6c93eb4477d88af046b915bc955c03693b2cbb58&to=a4bee6d07732b1184c436da489040b912f0dc271&stat=instructions But, looking at stats, i think it isn't great that we would no longer do LICM after LoopRotation, in particular: | statistic name | LoopRotate-LICM | LICM-LoopRotate | Δ | % | abs(%) | | asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 9015930 | 9015799 | -131 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | indvars.NumElimCmp | 3536 | 3544 | 8 | 0.23% | 0.23% | | indvars.NumElimExt | 36725 | 36580 | -145 | -0.39% | 0.39% | | indvars.NumElimIV | 1197 | 1187 | -10 | -0.84% | 0.84% | | indvars.NumElimIdentity | 143 | 136 | -7 | -4.90% | 4.90% | | indvars.NumElimRem | 4 | 5 | 1 | 25.00% | 25.00% | | indvars.NumLFTR | 29842 | 29890 | 48 | 0.16% | 0.16% | | indvars.NumReplaced | 2293 | 2227 | -66 | -2.88% | 2.88% | | indvars.NumSimplifiedSDiv | 6 | 8 | 2 | 33.33% | 33.33% | | indvars.NumWidened | 26438 | 26329 | -109 | -0.41% | 0.41% | | instcount.TotalBlocks | 1178338 | 1173840 | -4498 | -0.38% | 0.38% | | instcount.TotalFuncs | 111825 | 111829 | 4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | instcount.TotalInsts | 9905442 | 9896139 | -9303 | -0.09% | 0.09% | | lcssa.NumLCSSA | 425871 | 423961 | -1910 | -0.45% | 0.45% | | licm.NumHoisted | 378357 | 378753 | 396 | 0.10% | 0.10% | | licm.NumMovedCalls | 2193 | 2208 | 15 | 0.68% | 0.68% | | licm.NumMovedLoads | 35899 | 31821 | -4078 | -11.36% | 11.36% | | licm.NumPromoted | 11178 | 11154 | -24 | -0.21% | 0.21% | | licm.NumSunk | 13359 | 13587 | 228 | 1.71% | 1.71% | | loop-delete.NumDeleted | 8547 | 8402 | -145 | -1.70% | 1.70% | | loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified | 12876 | 11890 | -986 | -7.66% | 7.66% | | loop-peel.NumPeeled | 1008 | 925 | -83 | -8.23% | 8.23% | | loop-rotate.NumNotRotatedDueToHeaderSize | 368 | 365 | -3 | -0.82% | 0.82% | | loop-rotate.NumRotated | 42015 | 42003 | -12 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted | 240 | 242 | 2 | 0.83% | 0.83% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopExitsDeleted | 497 | 20 | -477 | -95.98% | 95.98% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded | 618 | 336 | -282 | -45.63% | 45.63% | | loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled | 11028 | 11032 | 4 | 0.04% | 0.04% | | loop-unroll.NumUnrolled | 12608 | 12529 | -79 | -0.63% | 0.63% | | mem2reg.NumDeadAlloca | 10222 | 10221 | -1 | -0.01% | 0.01% | | mem2reg.NumPHIInsert | 192110 | 192106 | -4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | mem2reg.NumSingleStore | 637650 | 637643 | -7 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | scalar-evolution.NumBruteForceTripCountsComputed | 814 | 812 | -2 | -0.25% | 0.25% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed | 283108 | 282934 | -174 | -0.06% | 0.06% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed | 106712 | 106718 | 6 | 0.01% | 0.01% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 5178 | 4752 | -426 | -8.23% | 8.23% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914 | 503 | -411 | -44.97% | 44.97% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches | 20 | 18 | -2 | -10.00% | 10.00% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 183 | 95 | -88 | -48.09% | 48.09% | ... but that actually regresses LICM (-12% `licm.NumMovedLoads`), loop-simplifycfg (`NumLoopExitsDeleted`, `NumTerminatorsFolded`), simple-loop-unswitch (`NumTrivial`). What if we instead have LICM both before and after LoopRotate? | statistic name | LoopRotate-LICM | LICM-LoopRotate-LICM | Δ | % | abs(%) | | asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 9015930 | 9014474 | -1456 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | indvars.NumElimCmp | 3536 | 3546 | 10 | 0.28% | 0.28% | | indvars.NumElimExt | 36725 | 36681 | -44 | -0.12% | 0.12% | | indvars.NumElimIV | 1197 | 1185 | -12 | -1.00% | 1.00% | | indvars.NumElimIdentity | 143 | 146 | 3 | 2.10% | 2.10% | | indvars.NumElimRem | 4 | 5 | 1 | 25.00% | 25.00% | | indvars.NumLFTR | 29842 | 29899 | 57 | 0.19% | 0.19% | | indvars.NumReplaced | 2293 | 2299 | 6 | 0.26% | 0.26% | | indvars.NumSimplifiedSDiv | 6 | 8 | 2 | 33.33% | 33.33% | | indvars.NumWidened | 26438 | 26404 | -34 | -0.13% | 0.13% | | instcount.TotalBlocks | 1178338 | 1173652 | -4686 | -0.40% | 0.40% | | instcount.TotalFuncs | 111825 | 111829 | 4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | instcount.TotalInsts | 9905442 | 9895452 | -9990 | -0.10% | 0.10% | | lcssa.NumLCSSA | 425871 | 425373 | -498 | -0.12% | 0.12% | | licm.NumHoisted | 378357 | 383352 | 4995 | 1.32% | 1.32% | | licm.NumMovedCalls | 2193 | 2204 | 11 | 0.50% | 0.50% | | licm.NumMovedLoads | 35899 | 35755 | -144 | -0.40% | 0.40% | | licm.NumPromoted | 11178 | 11163 | -15 | -0.13% | 0.13% | | licm.NumSunk | 13359 | 14321 | 962 | 7.20% | 7.20% | | loop-delete.NumDeleted | 8547 | 8538 | -9 | -0.11% | 0.11% | | loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified | 12876 | 12041 | -835 | -6.48% | 6.48% | | loop-peel.NumPeeled | 1008 | 924 | -84 | -8.33% | 8.33% | | loop-rotate.NumNotRotatedDueToHeaderSize | 368 | 365 | -3 | -0.82% | 0.82% | | loop-rotate.NumRotated | 42015 | 42005 | -10 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted | 240 | 241 | 1 | 0.42% | 0.42% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded | 618 | 619 | 1 | 0.16% | 0.16% | | loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled | 11028 | 11029 | 1 | 0.01% | 0.01% | | loop-unroll.NumUnrolled | 12608 | 12525 | -83 | -0.66% | 0.66% | | mem2reg.NumPHIInsert | 192110 | 192073 | -37 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | mem2reg.NumSingleStore | 637650 | 637652 | 2 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed | 283108 | 282998 | -110 | -0.04% | 0.04% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed | 106712 | 106691 | -21 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 5178 | 5185 | 7 | 0.14% | 0.14% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914 | 925 | 11 | 1.20% | 1.20% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 183 | 179 | -4 | -2.19% | 2.19% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 5178 | 4752 | -426 | -8.23% | 8.23% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914 | 503 | -411 | -44.97% | 44.97% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches | 20 | 18 | -2 | -10.00% | 10.00% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 183 | 95 | -88 | -48.09% | 48.09% | I.e. we end up with less instructions, less peeling, more LICM activity, also note how none of those 4 regressions are here. Namely: | statistic name | LICM-LoopRotate | LICM-LoopRotate-LICM | Δ | % | abs(%) | | asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 9015799 | 9014474 | -1325 | -0.01% | 0.01% | | indvars.NumElimCmp | 3544 | 3546 | 2 | 0.06% | 0.06% | | indvars.NumElimExt | 36580 | 36681 | 101 | 0.28% | 0.28% | | indvars.NumElimIV | 1187 | 1185 | -2 | -0.17% | 0.17% | | indvars.NumElimIdentity | 136 | 146 | 10 | 7.35% | 7.35% | | indvars.NumLFTR | 29890 | 29899 | 9 | 0.03% | 0.03% | | indvars.NumReplaced | 2227 | 2299 | 72 | 3.23% | 3.23% | | indvars.NumWidened | 26329 | 26404 | 75 | 0.28% | 0.28% | | instcount.TotalBlocks | 1173840 | 1173652 | -188 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | instcount.TotalInsts | 9896139 | 9895452 | -687 | -0.01% | 0.01% | | lcssa.NumLCSSA | 423961 | 425373 | 1412 | 0.33% | 0.33% | | licm.NumHoisted | 378753 | 383352 | 4599 | 1.21% | 1.21% | | licm.NumMovedCalls | 2208 | 2204 | -4 | -0.18% | 0.18% | | licm.NumMovedLoads | 31821 | 35755 | 3934 | 12.36% | 12.36% | | licm.NumPromoted | 11154 | 11163 | 9 | 0.08% | 0.08% | | licm.NumSunk | 13587 | 14321 | 734 | 5.40% | 5.40% | | loop-delete.NumDeleted | 8402 | 8538 | 136 | 1.62% | 1.62% | | loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified | 11890 | 12041 | 151 | 1.27% | 1.27% | | loop-peel.NumPeeled | 925 | 924 | -1 | -0.11% | 0.11% | | loop-rotate.NumRotated | 42003 | 42005 | 2 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted | 242 | 241 | -1 | -0.41% | 0.41% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopExitsDeleted | 20 | 497 | 477 | 2385.00% | 2385.00% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded | 336 | 619 | 283 | 84.23% | 84.23% | | loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled | 11032 | 11029 | -3 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | loop-unroll.NumUnrolled | 12529 | 12525 | -4 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | mem2reg.NumDeadAlloca | 10221 | 10222 | 1 | 0.01% | 0.01% | | mem2reg.NumPHIInsert | 192106 | 192073 | -33 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | mem2reg.NumSingleStore | 637643 | 637652 | 9 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | scalar-evolution.NumBruteForceTripCountsComputed | 812 | 814 | 2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed | 282934 | 282998 | 64 | 0.02% | 0.02% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed | 106718 | 106691 | -27 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 4752 | 5185 | 433 | 9.11% | 9.11% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 503 | 925 | 422 | 83.90% | 83.90% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches | 18 | 20 | 2 | 11.11% | 11.11% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 95 | 179 | 84 | 88.42% | 88.42% | {F15983613} {F15983615} {F15983616} (this is vanilla llvm testsuite + rawspeed + darktable) As an example of the code where early LICM only is bad, see: https://godbolt.org/z/GzEbacs4K This does have an observable compile-time regression of +~0.5% geomean https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7c5222e4d1a3a14f029e5f614c9aefd0fa505f1e&to=5d81826c3411982ca26e46b9d0aff34c80577664&stat=instructions but i think that's basically nothing, and there's potential that it might be avoidable in the future by fixing clang to produce alignment information on function arguments, thus making the second run unneeded. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99249
2021-04-02 09:40:12 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Memory SSA
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: LCSSA Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
[PassManager] Run additional LICM before LoopRotate Loop rotation often has to perform code duplication from header into preheader, which introduces PHI nodes. >>! In D99204, @thopre wrote: > > With loop peeling, it is important that unnecessary PHIs be avoided or > it will leads to spurious peeling. One source of such PHIs is loop > rotation which creates PHIs for invariant loads. Those PHIs are > particularly problematic since loop peeling is now run as part of simple > loop unrolling before GVN is run, and are thus a source of spurious > peeling. > > Note that while some of the load can be hoisted and eventually > eliminated by instruction combine, this is not always possible due to > alignment issue. In particular, the motivating example [1] was a load > inside a class instance which cannot be hoisted because the `this' > pointer has an alignment of 1. > > [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210312/4ce73c47/attachment.cpp Now, we could enhance LoopRotate to avoid duplicating code when not needed, but instead hoist loop-invariant code, but isn't that a code duplication? (*sic*) We have LICM, and in fact we already run it right after LoopRotation. We could try to move it to before LoopRotation, that is basically free from compile-time perspective: https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=6c93eb4477d88af046b915bc955c03693b2cbb58&to=a4bee6d07732b1184c436da489040b912f0dc271&stat=instructions But, looking at stats, i think it isn't great that we would no longer do LICM after LoopRotation, in particular: | statistic name | LoopRotate-LICM | LICM-LoopRotate | Δ | % | abs(%) | | asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 9015930 | 9015799 | -131 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | indvars.NumElimCmp | 3536 | 3544 | 8 | 0.23% | 0.23% | | indvars.NumElimExt | 36725 | 36580 | -145 | -0.39% | 0.39% | | indvars.NumElimIV | 1197 | 1187 | -10 | -0.84% | 0.84% | | indvars.NumElimIdentity | 143 | 136 | -7 | -4.90% | 4.90% | | indvars.NumElimRem | 4 | 5 | 1 | 25.00% | 25.00% | | indvars.NumLFTR | 29842 | 29890 | 48 | 0.16% | 0.16% | | indvars.NumReplaced | 2293 | 2227 | -66 | -2.88% | 2.88% | | indvars.NumSimplifiedSDiv | 6 | 8 | 2 | 33.33% | 33.33% | | indvars.NumWidened | 26438 | 26329 | -109 | -0.41% | 0.41% | | instcount.TotalBlocks | 1178338 | 1173840 | -4498 | -0.38% | 0.38% | | instcount.TotalFuncs | 111825 | 111829 | 4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | instcount.TotalInsts | 9905442 | 9896139 | -9303 | -0.09% | 0.09% | | lcssa.NumLCSSA | 425871 | 423961 | -1910 | -0.45% | 0.45% | | licm.NumHoisted | 378357 | 378753 | 396 | 0.10% | 0.10% | | licm.NumMovedCalls | 2193 | 2208 | 15 | 0.68% | 0.68% | | licm.NumMovedLoads | 35899 | 31821 | -4078 | -11.36% | 11.36% | | licm.NumPromoted | 11178 | 11154 | -24 | -0.21% | 0.21% | | licm.NumSunk | 13359 | 13587 | 228 | 1.71% | 1.71% | | loop-delete.NumDeleted | 8547 | 8402 | -145 | -1.70% | 1.70% | | loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified | 12876 | 11890 | -986 | -7.66% | 7.66% | | loop-peel.NumPeeled | 1008 | 925 | -83 | -8.23% | 8.23% | | loop-rotate.NumNotRotatedDueToHeaderSize | 368 | 365 | -3 | -0.82% | 0.82% | | loop-rotate.NumRotated | 42015 | 42003 | -12 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted | 240 | 242 | 2 | 0.83% | 0.83% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopExitsDeleted | 497 | 20 | -477 | -95.98% | 95.98% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded | 618 | 336 | -282 | -45.63% | 45.63% | | loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled | 11028 | 11032 | 4 | 0.04% | 0.04% | | loop-unroll.NumUnrolled | 12608 | 12529 | -79 | -0.63% | 0.63% | | mem2reg.NumDeadAlloca | 10222 | 10221 | -1 | -0.01% | 0.01% | | mem2reg.NumPHIInsert | 192110 | 192106 | -4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | mem2reg.NumSingleStore | 637650 | 637643 | -7 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | scalar-evolution.NumBruteForceTripCountsComputed | 814 | 812 | -2 | -0.25% | 0.25% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed | 283108 | 282934 | -174 | -0.06% | 0.06% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed | 106712 | 106718 | 6 | 0.01% | 0.01% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 5178 | 4752 | -426 | -8.23% | 8.23% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914 | 503 | -411 | -44.97% | 44.97% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches | 20 | 18 | -2 | -10.00% | 10.00% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 183 | 95 | -88 | -48.09% | 48.09% | ... but that actually regresses LICM (-12% `licm.NumMovedLoads`), loop-simplifycfg (`NumLoopExitsDeleted`, `NumTerminatorsFolded`), simple-loop-unswitch (`NumTrivial`). What if we instead have LICM both before and after LoopRotate? | statistic name | LoopRotate-LICM | LICM-LoopRotate-LICM | Δ | % | abs(%) | | asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 9015930 | 9014474 | -1456 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | indvars.NumElimCmp | 3536 | 3546 | 10 | 0.28% | 0.28% | | indvars.NumElimExt | 36725 | 36681 | -44 | -0.12% | 0.12% | | indvars.NumElimIV | 1197 | 1185 | -12 | -1.00% | 1.00% | | indvars.NumElimIdentity | 143 | 146 | 3 | 2.10% | 2.10% | | indvars.NumElimRem | 4 | 5 | 1 | 25.00% | 25.00% | | indvars.NumLFTR | 29842 | 29899 | 57 | 0.19% | 0.19% | | indvars.NumReplaced | 2293 | 2299 | 6 | 0.26% | 0.26% | | indvars.NumSimplifiedSDiv | 6 | 8 | 2 | 33.33% | 33.33% | | indvars.NumWidened | 26438 | 26404 | -34 | -0.13% | 0.13% | | instcount.TotalBlocks | 1178338 | 1173652 | -4686 | -0.40% | 0.40% | | instcount.TotalFuncs | 111825 | 111829 | 4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | instcount.TotalInsts | 9905442 | 9895452 | -9990 | -0.10% | 0.10% | | lcssa.NumLCSSA | 425871 | 425373 | -498 | -0.12% | 0.12% | | licm.NumHoisted | 378357 | 383352 | 4995 | 1.32% | 1.32% | | licm.NumMovedCalls | 2193 | 2204 | 11 | 0.50% | 0.50% | | licm.NumMovedLoads | 35899 | 35755 | -144 | -0.40% | 0.40% | | licm.NumPromoted | 11178 | 11163 | -15 | -0.13% | 0.13% | | licm.NumSunk | 13359 | 14321 | 962 | 7.20% | 7.20% | | loop-delete.NumDeleted | 8547 | 8538 | -9 | -0.11% | 0.11% | | loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified | 12876 | 12041 | -835 | -6.48% | 6.48% | | loop-peel.NumPeeled | 1008 | 924 | -84 | -8.33% | 8.33% | | loop-rotate.NumNotRotatedDueToHeaderSize | 368 | 365 | -3 | -0.82% | 0.82% | | loop-rotate.NumRotated | 42015 | 42005 | -10 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted | 240 | 241 | 1 | 0.42% | 0.42% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded | 618 | 619 | 1 | 0.16% | 0.16% | | loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled | 11028 | 11029 | 1 | 0.01% | 0.01% | | loop-unroll.NumUnrolled | 12608 | 12525 | -83 | -0.66% | 0.66% | | mem2reg.NumPHIInsert | 192110 | 192073 | -37 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | mem2reg.NumSingleStore | 637650 | 637652 | 2 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed | 283108 | 282998 | -110 | -0.04% | 0.04% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed | 106712 | 106691 | -21 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 5178 | 5185 | 7 | 0.14% | 0.14% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914 | 925 | 11 | 1.20% | 1.20% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 183 | 179 | -4 | -2.19% | 2.19% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 5178 | 4752 | -426 | -8.23% | 8.23% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914 | 503 | -411 | -44.97% | 44.97% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches | 20 | 18 | -2 | -10.00% | 10.00% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 183 | 95 | -88 | -48.09% | 48.09% | I.e. we end up with less instructions, less peeling, more LICM activity, also note how none of those 4 regressions are here. Namely: | statistic name | LICM-LoopRotate | LICM-LoopRotate-LICM | Δ | % | abs(%) | | asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 9015799 | 9014474 | -1325 | -0.01% | 0.01% | | indvars.NumElimCmp | 3544 | 3546 | 2 | 0.06% | 0.06% | | indvars.NumElimExt | 36580 | 36681 | 101 | 0.28% | 0.28% | | indvars.NumElimIV | 1187 | 1185 | -2 | -0.17% | 0.17% | | indvars.NumElimIdentity | 136 | 146 | 10 | 7.35% | 7.35% | | indvars.NumLFTR | 29890 | 29899 | 9 | 0.03% | 0.03% | | indvars.NumReplaced | 2227 | 2299 | 72 | 3.23% | 3.23% | | indvars.NumWidened | 26329 | 26404 | 75 | 0.28% | 0.28% | | instcount.TotalBlocks | 1173840 | 1173652 | -188 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | instcount.TotalInsts | 9896139 | 9895452 | -687 | -0.01% | 0.01% | | lcssa.NumLCSSA | 423961 | 425373 | 1412 | 0.33% | 0.33% | | licm.NumHoisted | 378753 | 383352 | 4599 | 1.21% | 1.21% | | licm.NumMovedCalls | 2208 | 2204 | -4 | -0.18% | 0.18% | | licm.NumMovedLoads | 31821 | 35755 | 3934 | 12.36% | 12.36% | | licm.NumPromoted | 11154 | 11163 | 9 | 0.08% | 0.08% | | licm.NumSunk | 13587 | 14321 | 734 | 5.40% | 5.40% | | loop-delete.NumDeleted | 8402 | 8538 | 136 | 1.62% | 1.62% | | loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified | 11890 | 12041 | 151 | 1.27% | 1.27% | | loop-peel.NumPeeled | 925 | 924 | -1 | -0.11% | 0.11% | | loop-rotate.NumRotated | 42003 | 42005 | 2 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted | 242 | 241 | -1 | -0.41% | 0.41% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopExitsDeleted | 20 | 497 | 477 | 2385.00% | 2385.00% | | loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded | 336 | 619 | 283 | 84.23% | 84.23% | | loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled | 11032 | 11029 | -3 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | loop-unroll.NumUnrolled | 12529 | 12525 | -4 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | mem2reg.NumDeadAlloca | 10221 | 10222 | 1 | 0.01% | 0.01% | | mem2reg.NumPHIInsert | 192106 | 192073 | -33 | -0.02% | 0.02% | | mem2reg.NumSingleStore | 637643 | 637652 | 9 | 0.00% | 0.00% | | scalar-evolution.NumBruteForceTripCountsComputed | 812 | 814 | 2 | 0.25% | 0.25% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed | 282934 | 282998 | 64 | 0.02% | 0.02% | | scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed | 106718 | 106691 | -27 | -0.03% | 0.03% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches | 4752 | 5185 | 433 | 9.11% | 9.11% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 503 | 925 | 422 | 83.90% | 83.90% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches | 18 | 20 | 2 | 11.11% | 11.11% | | simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial | 95 | 179 | 84 | 88.42% | 88.42% | {F15983613} {F15983615} {F15983616} (this is vanilla llvm testsuite + rawspeed + darktable) As an example of the code where early LICM only is bad, see: https://godbolt.org/z/GzEbacs4K This does have an observable compile-time regression of +~0.5% geomean https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7c5222e4d1a3a14f029e5f614c9aefd0fa505f1e&to=5d81826c3411982ca26e46b9d0aff34c80577664&stat=instructions but i think that's basically nothing, and there's potential that it might be avoidable in the future by fixing clang to produce alignment information on function arguments, thus making the second run unneeded. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99249
2021-04-02 09:40:12 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Invariant Code Motion
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Rotate Loops
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Invariant Code Motion
; CHECK-NEXT: Unswitch loops
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: LCSSA Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Recognize loop idioms
[PassManager] Run Induction Variable Simplification pass *after* Recognize loop idioms pass, not before Currently, `-indvars` runs first, and then immediately after `-loop-idiom` does. I'm not really sure if `-loop-idiom` requires `-indvars` to run beforehand, but i'm *very* sure that `-indvars` requires `-loop-idiom` to run afterwards, as it can be seen in the phase-ordering test. LoopIdiom runs on two types of loops: countable ones, and uncountable ones. For uncountable ones, IndVars obviously didn't make any change to them, since they are uncountable, so for them the order should be irrelevant. For countable ones, well, they should have been countable before IndVars for IndVars to make any change to them, and since SCEV is used on them, it shouldn't matter if IndVars have already canonicalized them. So i don't really see why we'd want the current ordering. Should this cause issues, it will give us a reproducer test case that shows flaws in this logic, and we then could adjust accordingly. While this is quite likely beneficial in-the-wild already, it's a required part for the full motivational pattern behind `left-shift-until-bittest` loop idiom (D91038). Reviewed By: dmgreen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91800
2020-11-25 17:17:25 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Induction Variable Simplification
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Delete dead loops
; CHECK-NEXT: Unroll loops
[OldPM] Pass manager: run SROA after (simple) loop unrolling I have stumbled into this pretty accidentally, when rewriting some spaghetti-like code into something more structured, which involved using some `std::array<>`s. And to my surprise, the `alloca`s remained, causing about `+160%` perf regression. https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=bb6f4d32aac3eecb51909f4facc625219307ee68&to=d563e66f40f9d4d145cb2050e41cb961e2b37785&stat=instructions suggests that this has geomean compile-time cost of `+0.08%`. Note that D68593 / cecc0d27ad58c0aed8ef9ed99bbf691e137a0f26 already did this chage for NewPM, but left OldPM in a pessimized state. This fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40011 | PR40011 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42794 | PR42794 ]] and probably some other reports. Reviewed By: nikic, xbolva00 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87972
2020-10-04 10:27:07 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: SROA
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: MergedLoadStoreMotion
[MemDep] Use PhiValuesAnalysis to improve alias analysis results This is being done in order to make GVN able to better optimize certain inputs. MemDep doesn't use PhiValues directly, but does need to notifiy it when things get invalidated. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48489 llvm-svn: 338384
2018-07-31 16:19:29 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Phi Values Analysis
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Memory Dependence Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Global Value Numbering
; CHECK-NEXT: Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation
; CHECK-NEXT: Demanded bits analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Bit-Tracking Dead Code Elimination
[MemCopyOpt] Enable MemorySSA by default This enables use of MemorySSA instead of MemDep in MemCpyOpt. To allow this without significant compile-time impact, the MemCpyOpt pass is moved directly before DSE (in the cases where this was not already the case), which allows us to reuse the existing MemorySSA analysis. Unlike the MemDep-based implementation, the MemorySSA-based MemCpyOpt can also perform simple optimizations across basic blocks. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94376
2021-01-10 10:52:01 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Value Information Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Jump Threading
; CHECK-NEXT: Value Propagation
[Passes] Move ADCE before DSE & LICM. The adjustment seems to have very little impact on optimizations. The only binary change with -O3 MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86 is in consumer-typeset and the size there actually decreases by -0.1%, with not significant changes in the stats. On its own, it is mildly positive in terms of compile-time, most likely due to LICM & DSE having to process slightly less instructions. It should also be unlikely that DSE/LICM make much new code dead. http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=df63eedef64d715ce1f31843f7de9c11fe1e597f&to=e3bdfcf94a9eeae6e006d010464f0c1b3550577d&stat=instructions With DSE & MemorySSA, it gives some nice compile-time improvements, due to the fact that DSE can re-use the PDT from ADCE, if it does not make any changes: http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=15fdd6cd7c24c745df1bb419e72ff66fd138aa7e&to=481f494515fc89cb7caea8d862e40f2c910dc994&stat=instructions Reviewed By: xbolva00 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87322
2020-10-21 11:21:50 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Aggressive Dead Code Elimination
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
Revert "[DSE] Switch to MemorySSA-backed DSE by default." There appears to be a mis-compile with MemorySSA-backed DSE in combination with llvm.lifetime.end. It currently appears like DSE is doing the right thing and the llvm.lifetime.end markers are incorrect. The reverted patch uncovers the mis-compile. This patch temporarily switches back to the legacy DSE implementation, while we investigate. This reverts commit 9d172c8e9c845a36b61dc12c27de8acdbef8b247.
2020-09-26 18:56:15 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Memory SSA
[MemCopyOpt] Enable MemorySSA by default This enables use of MemorySSA instead of MemDep in MemCpyOpt. To allow this without significant compile-time impact, the MemCpyOpt pass is moved directly before DSE (in the cases where this was not already the case), which allows us to reuse the existing MemorySSA analysis. Unlike the MemDep-based implementation, the MemorySSA-based MemCpyOpt can also perform simple optimizations across basic blocks. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94376
2021-01-10 10:52:01 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: MemCpy Optimization
Revert "[DSE] Remove stores in the same loop iteration" Apparently non-dead stores are being removed, as noted in D100464. This reverts commit 222aeb4d51a46c5a81c9e4ccb16d1d19dd21ec95.
2021-06-08 22:23:08 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
[DSE] Remove stores in the same loop iteration DSE will currently only remove stores in the same block unless they can be guaranteed to be loop invariant. This expands that to any stores that are in the same Loop, at the same loop level. This should still account for where AA/MSSA will not handle aliasing between loops, but allow the dead stores to be removed where they overlap in the same loop iteration. It requires adding loop info to DSE, but that looks fairly harmless. The test case this helps is from code like this, which can come up in certain matrix operations: for(i=..) dst[i] = 0; for(j=..) dst[i] += src[i*n+j]; After LICM, this becomes: for(i=..) dst[i] = 0; sum = 0; for(j=..) sum += src[i*n+j]; dst[i] = sum; The first store is dead, and with this patch is now removed. Differntial Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100464
2021-06-20 18:03:30 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Dead Store Elimination
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: LCSSA Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
Recommit "[DSE] Switch to MemorySSA-backed DSE by default." After investigation by @asbirlea, the issue that caused the revert appears to be an issue in the original source, rather than a problem with the compiler. This patch enables MemorySSA DSE again. This reverts commit 915310bf14cbac58a81fd60e0fa9dc8d341108e2.
2020-10-16 09:42:18 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
[BFI] Make BFI information available through loop passes inside LoopStandardAnalysisResults ~~D65060 uncovered that trying to use BFI in loop passes can lead to non-deterministic behavior when blocks are re-used while retaining old BFI data.~~ ~~To make sure BFI is preserved through loop passes a Value Handle (VH) callback is registered on blocks themselves. When a block is freed it now also wipes out the accompanying BFI entry such that stale BFI data can no longer persist resolving the determinism issue. ~~ ~~An optimistic approach would be to incrementally update BFI information throughout the loop passes rather than only invalidating them on removed blocks. The issues with that are:~~ ~~1. It is not clear how BFI information should be incrementally updated: If a block is duplicated does its BFI information come with? How about if it's split/modified/moved around? ~~ ~~2. Assuming we can address these problems the implementation here will be a massive undertaking. ~~ ~~There's a known need of BFI in LICM analysis which requires correct but not incrementally updated BFI data. A follow-up change can register BFI in all loop passes so this preserved but potentially lossy data is available to any loop pass that wants it.~~ See: D75341 for an identical implementation of preserving BFI via VH callbacks. The previous statements do still apply but this change no longer has to be in this diff because it's already upstream 😄 . This diff also moves BFI to be a part of LoopStandardAnalysisResults since the previous method using getCachedResults now (correctly!) statically asserts (D72893) that this data isn't static through the loop passes. Testing Ninja check Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86156
2020-09-16 01:09:30 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Invariant Code Motion
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: A No-Op Barrier Pass
; CHECK-NEXT: Eliminate Available Externally Globals
; CHECK-NEXT: CallGraph Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Deduce function attributes in RPO
; CHECK-NEXT: Global Variable Optimizer
[LegacyPM] Fix pass structure dumping If module pass uses on-demand function analyses then structure is being displayed incorrectly because FunctionPassManagerImpl can't dump contained FPPassManager instances. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69315
2019-11-01 12:43:51 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
[BPI][NFC] Reuse post dominantor tree from analysis manager when available Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager. Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban Reviewed By: skatkov Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
2020-04-28 11:31:20 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
[LegacyPM] Fix pass structure dumping If module pass uses on-demand function analyses then structure is being displayed incorrectly because FunctionPassManagerImpl can't dump contained FPPassManager instances. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69315
2019-11-01 12:43:51 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Dead Global Elimination
; CHECK-NEXT: CallGraph Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Globals Alias Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
[Float2Int] avoid crashing on unreachable code (PR38502) In the example from: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38502 ...we hit infinite looping/crashing because we have non-standard IR - an instruction operand is used before defined. This and other unusual constructs are allowed in unreachable blocks, so avoid the problem by using DominatorTree to step around landmines. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67766 llvm-svn: 372339
2019-09-19 18:31:17 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Float to int
Reapply r374743 with a fix for the ocaml binding Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to work all the time. The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert on the intrinsics. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280 llvm-svn: 374784
2019-10-14 18:15:14 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Lower constant intrinsics
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: LCSSA Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
[LoopRotate] Get and update MSSA only if available in legacy pass manager. Summary: Potential fix for: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44889 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44408 In the legacy pass manager, loop rotate need not compute MemorySSA when not being in the same loop pass manager with other loop passes. There isn't currently a way to differentiate between the two cases, so this attempts to limit the usage in LoopRotate to only update MemorySSA when the analysis is already available. The side-effect of this is that it will split the Loop pipeline. This issue does not apply to the new pass manager, where we have a flag specifying if all loop passes in that loop pass manager preserve MemorySSA. Reviewers: dmgreen, fedor.sergeev, nikic Subscribers: Prazek, hiraditya, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74574
2020-02-13 19:49:44 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Rotate Loops
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Access Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Distribution
[BPI][NFC] Reuse post dominantor tree from analysis manager when available Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager. Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban Reviewed By: skatkov Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
2020-04-28 11:31:20 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Access Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Demanded bits analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
[VectorUtils] Rework the Vector Function Database (VFDatabase). Summary: This commits is a rework of the patch in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572. The rework was requested to prevent out-of-tree performance regression when vectorizing out-of-tree IR intrinsics. The vectorization of such intrinsics is enquired via the static function `isTLIScalarize`. For detail see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572. Reviewers: uabelho, fhahn, sdesmalen Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72734
2019-12-13 20:43:26 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Inject TLI Mappings
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Vectorization
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Access Analysis
[PGO] Profile guided code size optimization. Summary: Enable some of the existing size optimizations for cold code under PGO. A ~5% code size saving in big internal app under PGO. The way it gets BFI/PSI is discussed in the RFC thread http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/130894.html Note it doesn't currently touch loop passes. Reviewers: davidxl, eraman Reviewed By: eraman Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, smeenai, mehdi_amini, eraman, zzheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59514 llvm-svn: 358422
2019-04-15 18:49:00 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Load Elimination
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Demanded bits analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
[SLP] Support vectorizing functions provided by vector libs. It seems like the SLPVectorizer is currently not aware of vector versions of functions provided by libraries like Accelerate [1]. This patch updates SLPVectorizer to use the same infrastructure the LoopVectorizer uses to detect vectorizable library functions. For calls, it computes the cost of an intrinsic call (existing behavior) and the cost of a vector function library call, if available. Like LoopVectorizer, it assumes the cost of the vector function is simply the cost of a call to a vector function. [1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accelerate Reviewers: ABataev, RKSimon, spatel Reviewed By: ABataev Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75878
2020-03-10 14:03:43 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Inject TLI Mappings
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: SLP Vectorizer
[VectorCombine] position pass after SLP in the optimization pipeline rather than before There are 2 known problem patterns shown in the test diffs here: vector horizontal ops (an x86 specialization) and vector reductions. SLP has greater ability to match and fold those than vector-combine, so let SLP have first chance at that. This is a quick fix while we continue to improve vector-combine and possibly canonicalize to reduction intrinsics. In the longer term, we should improve matching of these patterns because if they were created in the "bad" forms shown here, then we would miss optimizing them. I'm not sure what is happening with alias analysis on the addsub test. The old pass manager now shows an extra line for that, and we see an improvement that comes from SLP vectorizing a store. I don't know what's missing with the new pass manager to make that happen. Strangely, I can't reproduce the behavior if I compile from C++ with clang and invoke the new PM with "-fexperimental-new-pass-manager". Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80236
2020-05-22 18:13:18 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimize scalar/vector ops
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: LCSSA Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Unroll loops
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Combine redundant instructions
[MemorySSA] Re-enable MemorySSA use. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58311 llvm-svn: 370957
2019-09-04 21:16:04 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Memory SSA
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: LCSSA Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
[Unroll/UnrollAndJam/Vectorizer/Distribute] Add followup loop attributes. When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g. #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable) #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) is the same as #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable) and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used. This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance, !0 = !{!0, !1, !2} !1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"} !2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3} !3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"} defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop. Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account. For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations. Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated. To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied. With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling). Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288 llvm-svn: 348944
2018-12-12 18:32:52 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
[BFI] Make BFI information available through loop passes inside LoopStandardAnalysisResults ~~D65060 uncovered that trying to use BFI in loop passes can lead to non-deterministic behavior when blocks are re-used while retaining old BFI data.~~ ~~To make sure BFI is preserved through loop passes a Value Handle (VH) callback is registered on blocks themselves. When a block is freed it now also wipes out the accompanying BFI entry such that stale BFI data can no longer persist resolving the determinism issue. ~~ ~~An optimistic approach would be to incrementally update BFI information throughout the loop passes rather than only invalidating them on removed blocks. The issues with that are:~~ ~~1. It is not clear how BFI information should be incrementally updated: If a block is duplicated does its BFI information come with? How about if it's split/modified/moved around? ~~ ~~2. Assuming we can address these problems the implementation here will be a massive undertaking. ~~ ~~There's a known need of BFI in LICM analysis which requires correct but not incrementally updated BFI data. A follow-up change can register BFI in all loop passes so this preserved but potentially lossy data is available to any loop pass that wants it.~~ See: D75341 for an identical implementation of preserving BFI via VH callbacks. The previous statements do still apply but this change no longer has to be in this diff because it's already upstream 😄 . This diff also moves BFI to be a part of LoopStandardAnalysisResults since the previous method using getCachedResults now (correctly!) statically asserts (D72893) that this data isn't static through the loop passes. Testing Ninja check Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86156
2020-09-16 01:09:30 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Invariant Code Motion
[Unroll/UnrollAndJam/Vectorizer/Distribute] Add followup loop attributes. When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g. #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable) #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) is the same as #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable) and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used. This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance, !0 = !{!0, !1, !2} !1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"} !2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3} !3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"} defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop. Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account. For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations. Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated. To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied. With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling). Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288 llvm-svn: 348944
2018-12-12 18:32:52 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Warn about non-applied transformations
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Alignment from assumptions
; CHECK-NEXT: Strip Unused Function Prototypes
; CHECK-NEXT: Dead Global Elimination
; CHECK-NEXT: Merge Duplicate Global Constants
[LPM] Port CGProfilePass from NPM to LPM Reviewers: hans, chandlerc!, asbirlea, nikic Reviewed By: hans, nikic Subscribers: steven_wu, dexonsmith, nikic, echristo, void, zhizhouy, cfe-commits, aeubanks, MaskRay, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm, #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83013
2020-07-08 21:30:28 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Call Graph Profile
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
[BPI][NFC] Reuse post dominantor tree from analysis manager when available Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager. Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban Reviewed By: skatkov Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
2020-04-28 11:31:20 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Canonicalize natural loops
; CHECK-NEXT: LCSSA Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
; CHECK-NEXT: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)
; CHECK-NEXT: Function Alias Analysis Results
; CHECK-NEXT: Scalar Evolution Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Pass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Loop Sink
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Lazy Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Optimization Remark Emitter
; CHECK-NEXT: Remove redundant instructions
; CHECK-NEXT: Hoist/decompose integer division and remainder
; CHECK-NEXT: Simplify the CFG
Add !annotation metadata and remarks pass. This patch adds a new !annotation metadata kind which can be used to attach annotation strings to instructions. It also adds a new pass that emits summary remarks per function with the counts for each annotation kind. The intended uses cases for this new metadata is annotating 'interesting' instructions and the remarks should provide additional insight into transformations applied to a program. To motivate this, consider these specific questions we would like to get answered: * How many stores added for automatic variable initialization remain after optimizations? Where are they? * How many runtime checks inserted by a frontend could be eliminated? Where are the ones that did not get eliminated? Discussed on llvm-dev as part of 'RFC: Combining Annotation Metadata and Remarks' (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146393.html) Reviewed By: thegameg, jdoerfert Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91188
2020-11-13 10:46:55 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Annotation Remarks
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Module Verifier
; CHECK-NEXT: Bitcode Writer
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass Arguments:
Recommit r333268: [IPSCCP] Use PredicateInfo to propagate facts from cmp instructions. This version of the patch fixes cleaning up ssa_copy intrinsics, so it does not crash for instructions in blocks that have been marked unreachable. This patch updates IPSCCP to use PredicateInfo to propagate facts to true branches predicated by EQ and to false branches predicated by NE. As a follow up, we should be able to extend it to also propagate additional facts about nonnull. Reviewers: davide, mssimpso, dberlin, efriedma Reviewed By: davide, dberlin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45330 llvm-svn: 340525
2018-08-23 13:04:00 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass Arguments:
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Target Library Information
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
[BPI][NFC] Reuse post dominantor tree from analysis manager when available Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager. Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban Reviewed By: skatkov Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
2020-04-28 11:31:20 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass Arguments:
; CHECK-NEXT: Target Library Information
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
; CHECK-NEXT: Dominator Tree Construction
; CHECK-NEXT: Natural Loop Information
[BPI][NFC] Reuse post dominantor tree from analysis manager when available Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager. Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban Reviewed By: skatkov Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
2020-04-28 11:31:20 +02:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Post-Dominator Tree Construction
[test] Add tests for opt passes pipelines for O0, O2, O3, and Os. llvm-svn: 328160
2018-03-21 23:17:31 +01:00
; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
define void @f() {
ret void
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink