2018-04-26 18:11:19 +02:00
|
|
|
;RUN: llc < %s -march=amdgcn -mcpu=verde -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck -check-prefix=VERDE %s
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
;RUN: llc < %s -march=amdgcn -mcpu=tonga -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
2016-04-29 11:02:30 +02:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[4:7], off, s[0:3], 0 glc
|
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[8:11], off, s[0:3], 0 slc
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store(<4 x i32> inreg, <4 x float>, <4 x float>, <4 x float>) {
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
main_body:
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %1, <4 x i32> %0, i32 0, i32 0, i1 0, i1 0)
|
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %2, <4 x i32> %0, i32 0, i32 0, i1 1, i1 0)
|
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %3, <4 x i32> %0, i32 0, i32 0, i1 0, i1 1)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_immoffs:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
2016-04-29 11:02:30 +02:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], off, s[0:3], 0 offset:42
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_immoffs(<4 x i32> inreg, <4 x float>) {
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
main_body:
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %1, <4 x i32> %0, i32 0, i32 42, i1 0, i1 0)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_idx:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], v4, s[0:3], 0 idxen
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_idx(<4 x i32> inreg, <4 x float>, i32) {
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
main_body:
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %1, <4 x i32> %0, i32 %2, i32 0, i1 0, i1 0)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_ofs:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], v4, s[0:3], 0 offen
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_ofs(<4 x i32> inreg, <4 x float>, i32) {
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
main_body:
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %1, <4 x i32> %0, i32 0, i32 %2, i1 0, i1 0)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_both:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], v[4:5], s[0:3], 0 idxen offen
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_both(<4 x i32> inreg, <4 x float>, i32, i32) {
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
main_body:
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %1, <4 x i32> %0, i32 %2, i32 %3, i1 0, i1 0)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_both_reversed:
|
|
|
|
;CHECK: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, v4
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], v[5:6], s[0:3], 0 idxen offen
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_both_reversed(<4 x i32> inreg, <4 x float>, i32, i32) {
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
main_body:
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %1, <4 x i32> %0, i32 %3, i32 %2, i1 0, i1 0)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Ideally, the register allocator would avoid the wait here
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_wait:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], v4, s[0:3], 0 idxen
|
2018-04-26 18:11:19 +02:00
|
|
|
;VERDE: s_waitcnt expcnt(0)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_load_format_xyzw v[0:3], v5, s[0:3], 0 idxen
|
|
|
|
;CHECK: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xyzw v[0:3], v6, s[0:3], 0 idxen
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_wait(<4 x i32> inreg, <4 x float>, i32, i32, i32) {
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
main_body:
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %1, <4 x i32> %0, i32 %2, i32 0, i1 0, i1 0)
|
2016-03-18 17:24:40 +01:00
|
|
|
%data = call <4 x float> @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format.v4f32(<4 x i32> %0, i32 %3, i32 0, i1 0, i1 0)
|
2016-03-18 17:24:20 +01:00
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float> %data, <4 x i32> %0, i32 %4, i32 0, i1 0, i1 0)
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-12 23:18:10 +02:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_x1:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
2016-04-12 23:18:10 +02:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_x v0, v1, s[0:3], 0 idxen
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_x1(<4 x i32> inreg %rsrc, float %data, i32 %index) {
|
|
|
|
main_body:
|
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.f32(float %data, <4 x i32> %rsrc, i32 %index, i32 0, i1 0, i1 0)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;CHECK-LABEL: {{^}}buffer_store_x2:
|
2017-11-09 02:52:48 +01:00
|
|
|
;CHECK-NOT: s_waitcnt
|
2016-04-12 23:18:10 +02:00
|
|
|
;CHECK: buffer_store_format_xy v[0:1], v2, s[0:3], 0 idxen
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_ps void @buffer_store_x2(<4 x i32> inreg %rsrc, <2 x float> %data, i32 %index) {
|
|
|
|
main_body:
|
|
|
|
call void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v2f32(<2 x float> %data, <4 x i32> %rsrc, i32 %index, i32 0, i1 0, i1 0)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declare void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.f32(float, <4 x i32>, i32, i32, i1, i1) #0
|
|
|
|
declare void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v2f32(<2 x float>, <4 x i32>, i32, i32, i1, i1) #0
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
declare void @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format.v4f32(<4 x float>, <4 x i32>, i32, i32, i1, i1) #0
|
|
|
|
declare <4 x float> @llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format.v4f32(<4 x i32>, i32, i32, i1, i1) #1
|
AMDGPU/SI: add llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format intrinsics
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
2016-03-10 19:43:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-06 21:40:20 +02:00
|
|
|
attributes #0 = { nounwind }
|
|
|
|
attributes #1 = { nounwind readonly }
|