This patch implements the general dynamic TLS model for 64-bit PowerPC.
Given a thread-local symbol x with global-dynamic access, the generated
code to obtain x's address is:
Instruction Relocation Symbol
addis ra,r2,x@got@tlsgd@ha R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA x
addi r3,ra,x@got@tlsgd@l R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_L x
bl __tls_get_addr(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD x
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
nop
<use address in r3>
The implementation borrows from the medium code model work for introducing
special forms of ADDIS and ADDI into the DAG representation. This is made
slightly more complicated by having to introduce a call to the external
function __tls_get_addr. Using the full call machinery is overkill and,
more importantly, makes it difficult to add a special relocation. So I've
introduced another opcode GET_TLS_ADDR to represent the function call, and
surrounded it with register copies to set up the parameter and return value.
Most of the code is pretty straightforward. I ran into one peculiarity
when I introduced a new PPC opcode BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD, which is just like
BL8_NOP_ELF except that it takes another parameter to represent the symbol
("x" above) that requires a relocation on the call. Something in the
TblGen machinery causes BL8_NOP_ELF and BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD to be treated
identically during the emit phase, so this second operand was never
visited to generate relocations. This is the reason for the slightly
messy workaround in PPCMCCodeEmitter.cpp:getDirectBrEncoding().
Two new tests are included to demonstrate correct external assembly and
correct generation of relocations using the integrated assembler.
Comments welcome!
Thanks,
Bill
llvm-svn: 169910
2012-12-11 21:30:11 +01:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mcpu=pwr7 -O0 -relocation-model=pic < %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Test correct assembly code generation for thread-local storage using
|
|
|
|
|
; the general dynamic model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
target datalayout = "E-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f128:128:128-v128:128:128-n32:64"
|
|
|
|
|
target triple = "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@a = thread_local global i32 0, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define signext i32 @main() nounwind {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 0, i32* %retval
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* @a, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %0
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: addis [[REG:[0-9]+]], 2, a@got@tlsgd@ha
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: addi 3, [[REG]], a@got@tlsgd@l
|
[PowerPC] Revert r185476 and fix up TLS variant kinds
In the commit message to r185476 I wrote:
>The PowerPC-specific modifiers VK_PPC_TLSGD and VK_PPC_TLSLD
>correspond exactly to the generic modifiers VK_TLSGD and VK_TLSLD.
>This causes some confusion with the asm parser, since VK_PPC_TLSGD
>is output as @tlsgd, which is then read back in as VK_TLSGD.
>
>To avoid this confusion, this patch removes the PowerPC-specific
>modifiers and uses the generic modifiers throughout. (The only
>drawback is that the generic modifiers are printed in upper case
>while the usual convention on PowerPC is to use lower-case modifiers.
>But this is just a cosmetic issue.)
This was unfortunately incorrect, there is is fact another,
serious drawback to using the default VK_TLSLD/VK_TLSGD
variant kinds: using these causes ELFObjectWriter::RelocNeedsGOT
to return true, which in turn causes the ELFObjectWriter to emit
an undefined reference to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_.
This is a problem on powerpc64, because it uses the TOC instead
of the GOT, and the linker does not provide _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_,
so the symbol remains undefined. This means shared libraries
using TLS built with the integrated assembler are currently
broken.
While the whole RelocNeedsGOT / _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ situation
probably ought to be properly fixed at some point, for now I'm
simply reverting the r185476 commit. Now this in turn exposes
the breakage of handling @tlsgd/@tlsld in the asm parser that
this check-in was originally intended to fix.
To avoid this regression, I'm also adding a different fix for
this problem: while common code now parses @tlsgd as VK_TLSGD,
a special hack in the asm parser translates this code to the
platform-specific VK_PPC_TLSGD that the back-end now expects.
While this is not really pretty, it's self-contained and
shouldn't hurt anything else for now. One the underlying
problem is fixed, this hack can be reverted again.
llvm-svn: 185945
2013-07-09 18:41:09 +02:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: bl __tls_get_addr(a@tlsgd)
|
This patch implements the general dynamic TLS model for 64-bit PowerPC.
Given a thread-local symbol x with global-dynamic access, the generated
code to obtain x's address is:
Instruction Relocation Symbol
addis ra,r2,x@got@tlsgd@ha R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA x
addi r3,ra,x@got@tlsgd@l R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_L x
bl __tls_get_addr(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD x
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
nop
<use address in r3>
The implementation borrows from the medium code model work for introducing
special forms of ADDIS and ADDI into the DAG representation. This is made
slightly more complicated by having to introduce a call to the external
function __tls_get_addr. Using the full call machinery is overkill and,
more importantly, makes it difficult to add a special relocation. So I've
introduced another opcode GET_TLS_ADDR to represent the function call, and
surrounded it with register copies to set up the parameter and return value.
Most of the code is pretty straightforward. I ran into one peculiarity
when I introduced a new PPC opcode BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD, which is just like
BL8_NOP_ELF except that it takes another parameter to represent the symbol
("x" above) that requires a relocation on the call. Something in the
TblGen machinery causes BL8_NOP_ELF and BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD to be treated
identically during the emit phase, so this second operand was never
visited to generate relocations. This is the reason for the slightly
messy workaround in PPCMCCodeEmitter.cpp:getDirectBrEncoding().
Two new tests are included to demonstrate correct external assembly and
correct generation of relocations using the integrated assembler.
Comments welcome!
Thanks,
Bill
llvm-svn: 169910
2012-12-11 21:30:11 +01:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: nop
|
|
|
|
|
|