RPCS3/llvm-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-25 20:23:11 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
c9fceef173
llvm-mirror/test/MC/ARM/directive-arch_extension-mp.s

39 lines
1.5 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

ARM IAS: (partially) support .arch_extension directive This adds a partial implementation of the .arch_extension directive to the integrated ARM assembler. There are a number of limitations to this implementation arising from the target backend support rather than the implementation itself. Namely, iWMMXT (v1 and v2), Maverick, and XScale support is not present in the ARM backend. Currently, there is no check for A-class only (needed for virt), and no ARMv6k detection (needed for os and sec). The remainder of the extensions are fully supported. llvm-svn: 201471
2014-02-16 01:16:41 +01:00
@ RUN: not llvm-mc -triple armv6-eabi -filetype asm -o /dev/null 2>&1 %s \
[Arm][MC] Remove unused prefixes in .arch_extension fp tests idiv: There is no difference between Armv7m and Thumbv7M behaviour so the specific CHECKs are not needed. The errors for Armv7-a and Thumbv7-a will always include "ARM" or "THUMB" respectively so they need their own CHECK prefix, making CHECK-V7 redundant. mp: Behaviour is dependent on whether the triple is v6/v7/v7M regardless of being Arm or Thumb. So we don't need the more specific CHECK-ARMv7M etc. simd: Errors are either v7 only, or v7 and v8 so CHECK-V8 is not needed. fp: Same as simd Reviewed By: ostannard Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90918
2020-11-06 11:20:20 +01:00
@ RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK-V6
ARM IAS: (partially) support .arch_extension directive This adds a partial implementation of the .arch_extension directive to the integrated ARM assembler. There are a number of limitations to this implementation arising from the target backend support rather than the implementation itself. Namely, iWMMXT (v1 and v2), Maverick, and XScale support is not present in the ARM backend. Currently, there is no check for A-class only (needed for virt), and no ARMv6k detection (needed for os and sec). The remainder of the extensions are fully supported. llvm-svn: 201471
2014-02-16 01:16:41 +01:00
@ RUN: not llvm-mc -triple armv7-eabi -filetype asm -o /dev/null 2>&1 %s \
[Arm][MC] Remove unused prefixes in .arch_extension fp tests idiv: There is no difference between Armv7m and Thumbv7M behaviour so the specific CHECKs are not needed. The errors for Armv7-a and Thumbv7-a will always include "ARM" or "THUMB" respectively so they need their own CHECK prefix, making CHECK-V7 redundant. mp: Behaviour is dependent on whether the triple is v6/v7/v7M regardless of being Arm or Thumb. So we don't need the more specific CHECK-ARMv7M etc. simd: Errors are either v7 only, or v7 and v8 so CHECK-V8 is not needed. fp: Same as simd Reviewed By: ostannard Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90918
2020-11-06 11:20:20 +01:00
@ RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK-V7
ARM IAS: (partially) support .arch_extension directive This adds a partial implementation of the .arch_extension directive to the integrated ARM assembler. There are a number of limitations to this implementation arising from the target backend support rather than the implementation itself. Namely, iWMMXT (v1 and v2), Maverick, and XScale support is not present in the ARM backend. Currently, there is no check for A-class only (needed for virt), and no ARMv6k detection (needed for os and sec). The remainder of the extensions are fully supported. llvm-svn: 201471
2014-02-16 01:16:41 +01:00
@ RUN: not llvm-mc -triple armv7m-eabi -filetype asm -o /dev/null 2>&1 %s \
[Arm][MC] Remove unused prefixes in .arch_extension fp tests idiv: There is no difference between Armv7m and Thumbv7M behaviour so the specific CHECKs are not needed. The errors for Armv7-a and Thumbv7-a will always include "ARM" or "THUMB" respectively so they need their own CHECK prefix, making CHECK-V7 redundant. mp: Behaviour is dependent on whether the triple is v6/v7/v7M regardless of being Arm or Thumb. So we don't need the more specific CHECK-ARMv7M etc. simd: Errors are either v7 only, or v7 and v8 so CHECK-V8 is not needed. fp: Same as simd Reviewed By: ostannard Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90918
2020-11-06 11:20:20 +01:00
@ RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK-V7M
ARM IAS: (partially) support .arch_extension directive This adds a partial implementation of the .arch_extension directive to the integrated ARM assembler. There are a number of limitations to this implementation arising from the target backend support rather than the implementation itself. Namely, iWMMXT (v1 and v2), Maverick, and XScale support is not present in the ARM backend. Currently, there is no check for A-class only (needed for virt), and no ARMv6k detection (needed for os and sec). The remainder of the extensions are fully supported. llvm-svn: 201471
2014-02-16 01:16:41 +01:00
@ RUN: not llvm-mc -triple thumbv6-eabi -filetype asm -o /dev/null 2>&1 %s \
[Arm][MC] Remove unused prefixes in .arch_extension fp tests idiv: There is no difference between Armv7m and Thumbv7M behaviour so the specific CHECKs are not needed. The errors for Armv7-a and Thumbv7-a will always include "ARM" or "THUMB" respectively so they need their own CHECK prefix, making CHECK-V7 redundant. mp: Behaviour is dependent on whether the triple is v6/v7/v7M regardless of being Arm or Thumb. So we don't need the more specific CHECK-ARMv7M etc. simd: Errors are either v7 only, or v7 and v8 so CHECK-V8 is not needed. fp: Same as simd Reviewed By: ostannard Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90918
2020-11-06 11:20:20 +01:00
@ RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK-V6
ARM IAS: (partially) support .arch_extension directive This adds a partial implementation of the .arch_extension directive to the integrated ARM assembler. There are a number of limitations to this implementation arising from the target backend support rather than the implementation itself. Namely, iWMMXT (v1 and v2), Maverick, and XScale support is not present in the ARM backend. Currently, there is no check for A-class only (needed for virt), and no ARMv6k detection (needed for os and sec). The remainder of the extensions are fully supported. llvm-svn: 201471
2014-02-16 01:16:41 +01:00
@ RUN: not llvm-mc -triple thumbv7-eabi -filetype asm -o /dev/null 2>&1 %s \
[Arm][MC] Remove unused prefixes in .arch_extension fp tests idiv: There is no difference between Armv7m and Thumbv7M behaviour so the specific CHECKs are not needed. The errors for Armv7-a and Thumbv7-a will always include "ARM" or "THUMB" respectively so they need their own CHECK prefix, making CHECK-V7 redundant. mp: Behaviour is dependent on whether the triple is v6/v7/v7M regardless of being Arm or Thumb. So we don't need the more specific CHECK-ARMv7M etc. simd: Errors are either v7 only, or v7 and v8 so CHECK-V8 is not needed. fp: Same as simd Reviewed By: ostannard Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90918
2020-11-06 11:20:20 +01:00
@ RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK-V7
ARM IAS: (partially) support .arch_extension directive This adds a partial implementation of the .arch_extension directive to the integrated ARM assembler. There are a number of limitations to this implementation arising from the target backend support rather than the implementation itself. Namely, iWMMXT (v1 and v2), Maverick, and XScale support is not present in the ARM backend. Currently, there is no check for A-class only (needed for virt), and no ARMv6k detection (needed for os and sec). The remainder of the extensions are fully supported. llvm-svn: 201471
2014-02-16 01:16:41 +01:00
@ RUN: not llvm-mc -triple thumbv7m-eabi -filetype asm -o /dev/null 2>&1 %s \
[Arm][MC] Remove unused prefixes in .arch_extension fp tests idiv: There is no difference between Armv7m and Thumbv7M behaviour so the specific CHECKs are not needed. The errors for Armv7-a and Thumbv7-a will always include "ARM" or "THUMB" respectively so they need their own CHECK prefix, making CHECK-V7 redundant. mp: Behaviour is dependent on whether the triple is v6/v7/v7M regardless of being Arm or Thumb. So we don't need the more specific CHECK-ARMv7M etc. simd: Errors are either v7 only, or v7 and v8 so CHECK-V8 is not needed. fp: Same as simd Reviewed By: ostannard Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90918
2020-11-06 11:20:20 +01:00
@ RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK-V7M
ARM IAS: (partially) support .arch_extension directive This adds a partial implementation of the .arch_extension directive to the integrated ARM assembler. There are a number of limitations to this implementation arising from the target backend support rather than the implementation itself. Namely, iWMMXT (v1 and v2), Maverick, and XScale support is not present in the ARM backend. Currently, there is no check for A-class only (needed for virt), and no ARMv6k detection (needed for os and sec). The remainder of the extensions are fully supported. llvm-svn: 201471
2014-02-16 01:16:41 +01:00
.syntax unified
.arch_extension mp
@ CHECK-V6: error: architectural extension 'mp' is not allowed for the current base architecture
@ CHECK-V6-NEXT: .arch_extension mp
@ CHECK-V6-NEXT: ^
.type mp,%function
mp:
pldw [r0]
@ CHECK-V6: error: instruction requires: mp-extensions armv7
@ CHECK-V7M: error: instruction requires: mp-extensions
.arch_extension nomp
@ CHECK-V6: error: architectural extension 'mp' is not allowed for the current base architecture
@ CHECK-V6-NEXT: .arch_extension nomp
@ CHECK-V6-NEXT: ^
.type nomp,%function
nomp:
pldw [r0]
@ CHECK-V6: error: instruction requires: mp-extensions armv7
@ CHECK-V7: error: instruction requires: mp-extensions
@ CHECK-V7M: error: instruction requires: mp-extensions
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink