[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
//===- VPlanSLP.cpp - SLP Analysis based on VPlan -------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 09:50:56 +01:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
/// This file implements SLP analysis based on VPlan. The analysis is based on
|
|
|
|
/// the ideas described in
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Look-ahead SLP: auto-vectorization in the presence of commutative
|
|
|
|
/// operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
|
|
|
|
/// Luís F. W. Góes
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "VPlan.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/Twine.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/VectorUtils.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Instruction.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Type.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Value.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/GraphWriter.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include <iterator>
|
|
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "vplan-slp"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Number of levels to look ahead when re-ordering multi node operands.
|
|
|
|
static unsigned LookaheadMaxDepth = 5;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VPInstruction *VPlanSlp::markFailed() {
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Currently this is used to signal we hit instructions we cannot
|
|
|
|
// trivially SLP'ize.
|
|
|
|
CompletelySLP = false;
|
|
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void VPlanSlp::addCombined(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands, VPInstruction *New) {
|
|
|
|
if (all_of(Operands, [](VPValue *V) {
|
|
|
|
return cast<VPInstruction>(V)->getUnderlyingInstr();
|
|
|
|
})) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned BundleSize = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (VPValue *V : Operands) {
|
|
|
|
Type *T = cast<VPInstruction>(V)->getUnderlyingInstr()->getType();
|
|
|
|
assert(!T->isVectorTy() && "Only scalar types supported for now");
|
|
|
|
BundleSize += T->getScalarSizeInBits();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
WidestBundleBits = std::max(WidestBundleBits, BundleSize);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto Res = BundleToCombined.try_emplace(to_vector<4>(Operands), New);
|
|
|
|
assert(Res.second &&
|
|
|
|
"Already created a combined instruction for the operand bundle");
|
|
|
|
(void)Res;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool VPlanSlp::areVectorizable(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands) const {
|
|
|
|
// Currently we only support VPInstructions.
|
|
|
|
if (!all_of(Operands, [](VPValue *Op) {
|
|
|
|
return Op && isa<VPInstruction>(Op) &&
|
|
|
|
cast<VPInstruction>(Op)->getUnderlyingInstr();
|
|
|
|
})) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "VPSLP: not all operands are VPInstructions\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if opcodes and type width agree for all instructions in the bundle.
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Differing widths/opcodes can be handled by inserting additional
|
|
|
|
// instructions.
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Deal with non-primitive types.
|
|
|
|
const Instruction *OriginalInstr =
|
|
|
|
cast<VPInstruction>(Operands[0])->getUnderlyingInstr();
|
|
|
|
unsigned Opcode = OriginalInstr->getOpcode();
|
|
|
|
unsigned Width = OriginalInstr->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
|
|
|
|
if (!all_of(Operands, [Opcode, Width](VPValue *Op) {
|
|
|
|
const Instruction *I = cast<VPInstruction>(Op)->getUnderlyingInstr();
|
|
|
|
return I->getOpcode() == Opcode &&
|
|
|
|
I->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() == Width;
|
|
|
|
})) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "VPSLP: Opcodes do not agree \n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For now, all operands must be defined in the same BB.
|
|
|
|
if (any_of(Operands, [this](VPValue *Op) {
|
|
|
|
return cast<VPInstruction>(Op)->getParent() != &this->BB;
|
|
|
|
})) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "VPSLP: operands in different BBs\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (any_of(Operands,
|
|
|
|
[](VPValue *Op) { return Op->hasMoreThanOneUniqueUser(); })) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "VPSLP: Some operands have multiple users.\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For loads, check that there are no instructions writing to memory in
|
|
|
|
// between them.
|
|
|
|
// TODO: we only have to forbid instructions writing to memory that could
|
|
|
|
// interfere with any of the loads in the bundle
|
|
|
|
if (Opcode == Instruction::Load) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned LoadsSeen = 0;
|
|
|
|
VPBasicBlock *Parent = cast<VPInstruction>(Operands[0])->getParent();
|
|
|
|
for (auto &I : *Parent) {
|
|
|
|
auto *VPI = cast<VPInstruction>(&I);
|
|
|
|
if (VPI->getOpcode() == Instruction::Load &&
|
2020-07-24 08:13:44 +02:00
|
|
|
llvm::is_contained(Operands, VPI))
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
LoadsSeen++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (LoadsSeen == Operands.size())
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (LoadsSeen > 0 && VPI->mayWriteToMemory()) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(
|
|
|
|
dbgs() << "VPSLP: instruction modifying memory between loads\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!all_of(Operands, [](VPValue *Op) {
|
|
|
|
return cast<LoadInst>(cast<VPInstruction>(Op)->getUnderlyingInstr())
|
|
|
|
->isSimple();
|
|
|
|
})) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "VPSLP: only simple loads are supported.\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (Opcode == Instruction::Store)
|
|
|
|
if (!all_of(Operands, [](VPValue *Op) {
|
|
|
|
return cast<StoreInst>(cast<VPInstruction>(Op)->getUnderlyingInstr())
|
|
|
|
->isSimple();
|
|
|
|
})) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "VPSLP: only simple stores are supported.\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static SmallVector<VPValue *, 4> getOperands(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Values,
|
|
|
|
unsigned OperandIndex) {
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<VPValue *, 4> Operands;
|
|
|
|
for (VPValue *V : Values) {
|
2020-09-23 15:44:31 +02:00
|
|
|
// Currently we only support VPInstructions.
|
|
|
|
auto *U = cast<VPInstruction>(V);
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
Operands.push_back(U->getOperand(OperandIndex));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return Operands;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool areCommutative(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Values) {
|
|
|
|
return Instruction::isCommutative(
|
|
|
|
cast<VPInstruction>(Values[0])->getOpcode());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static SmallVector<SmallVector<VPValue *, 4>, 4>
|
|
|
|
getOperands(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Values) {
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<SmallVector<VPValue *, 4>, 4> Result;
|
|
|
|
auto *VPI = cast<VPInstruction>(Values[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (VPI->getOpcode()) {
|
|
|
|
case Instruction::Load:
|
|
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Loads terminate a tree, no need to get operands");
|
|
|
|
case Instruction::Store:
|
|
|
|
Result.push_back(getOperands(Values, 0));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned I = 0, NumOps = VPI->getNumOperands(); I < NumOps; ++I)
|
|
|
|
Result.push_back(getOperands(Values, I));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return Result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns the opcode of Values or ~0 if they do not all agree.
|
|
|
|
static Optional<unsigned> getOpcode(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Values) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned Opcode = cast<VPInstruction>(Values[0])->getOpcode();
|
|
|
|
if (any_of(Values, [Opcode](VPValue *V) {
|
|
|
|
return cast<VPInstruction>(V)->getOpcode() != Opcode;
|
|
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
return {Opcode};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns true if A and B access sequential memory if they are loads or
|
|
|
|
/// stores or if they have identical opcodes otherwise.
|
|
|
|
static bool areConsecutiveOrMatch(VPInstruction *A, VPInstruction *B,
|
|
|
|
VPInterleavedAccessInfo &IAI) {
|
|
|
|
if (A->getOpcode() != B->getOpcode())
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (A->getOpcode() != Instruction::Load &&
|
|
|
|
A->getOpcode() != Instruction::Store)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
auto *GA = IAI.getInterleaveGroup(A);
|
|
|
|
auto *GB = IAI.getInterleaveGroup(B);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return GA && GB && GA == GB && GA->getIndex(A) + 1 == GB->getIndex(B);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Implements getLAScore from Listing 7 in the paper.
|
|
|
|
/// Traverses and compares operands of V1 and V2 to MaxLevel.
|
|
|
|
static unsigned getLAScore(VPValue *V1, VPValue *V2, unsigned MaxLevel,
|
|
|
|
VPInterleavedAccessInfo &IAI) {
|
2020-09-23 15:44:31 +02:00
|
|
|
auto *I1 = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(V1);
|
|
|
|
auto *I2 = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(V2);
|
|
|
|
// Currently we only support VPInstructions.
|
|
|
|
if (!I1 || !I2)
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (MaxLevel == 0)
|
2020-09-23 15:44:31 +02:00
|
|
|
return (unsigned)areConsecutiveOrMatch(I1, I2, IAI);
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned Score = 0;
|
2020-09-23 15:44:31 +02:00
|
|
|
for (unsigned I = 0, EV1 = I1->getNumOperands(); I < EV1; ++I)
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned J = 0, EV2 = I2->getNumOperands(); J < EV2; ++J)
|
|
|
|
Score +=
|
|
|
|
getLAScore(I1->getOperand(I), I2->getOperand(J), MaxLevel - 1, IAI);
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
return Score;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::pair<VPlanSlp::OpMode, VPValue *>
|
|
|
|
VPlanSlp::getBest(OpMode Mode, VPValue *Last,
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<VPValue *> &Candidates,
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
VPInterleavedAccessInfo &IAI) {
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
assert((Mode == OpMode::Load || Mode == OpMode::Opcode) &&
|
|
|
|
"Currently we only handle load and commutative opcodes");
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " getBest\n");
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
SmallVector<VPValue *, 4> BestCandidates;
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Candidates for "
|
|
|
|
<< *cast<VPInstruction>(Last)->getUnderlyingInstr() << " ");
|
|
|
|
for (auto *Candidate : Candidates) {
|
|
|
|
auto *LastI = cast<VPInstruction>(Last);
|
|
|
|
auto *CandidateI = cast<VPInstruction>(Candidate);
|
|
|
|
if (areConsecutiveOrMatch(LastI, CandidateI, IAI)) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << *cast<VPInstruction>(Candidate)->getUnderlyingInstr()
|
|
|
|
<< " ");
|
|
|
|
BestCandidates.push_back(Candidate);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BestCandidates.empty())
|
|
|
|
return {OpMode::Failed, nullptr};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BestCandidates.size() == 1)
|
|
|
|
return {Mode, BestCandidates[0]};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
VPValue *Best = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
unsigned BestScore = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned Depth = 1; Depth < LookaheadMaxDepth; Depth++) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned PrevScore = ~0u;
|
|
|
|
bool AllSame = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Avoid visiting the same operands multiple times.
|
|
|
|
for (auto *Candidate : BestCandidates) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned Score = getLAScore(Last, Candidate, Depth, IAI);
|
|
|
|
if (PrevScore == ~0u)
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
PrevScore = Score;
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
if (PrevScore != Score)
|
|
|
|
AllSame = false;
|
|
|
|
PrevScore = Score;
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
if (Score > BestScore) {
|
|
|
|
BestScore = Score;
|
|
|
|
Best = Candidate;
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!AllSame)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Found best "
|
|
|
|
<< *cast<VPInstruction>(Best)->getUnderlyingInstr()
|
|
|
|
<< "\n");
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
Candidates.erase(Best);
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return {Mode, Best};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<VPlanSlp::MultiNodeOpTy, 4> VPlanSlp::reorderMultiNodeOps() {
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<MultiNodeOpTy, 4> FinalOrder;
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<OpMode, 4> Mode;
|
|
|
|
FinalOrder.reserve(MultiNodeOps.size());
|
|
|
|
Mode.reserve(MultiNodeOps.size());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Reordering multinode\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (auto &Operands : MultiNodeOps) {
|
|
|
|
FinalOrder.push_back({Operands.first, {Operands.second[0]}});
|
|
|
|
if (cast<VPInstruction>(Operands.second[0])->getOpcode() ==
|
|
|
|
Instruction::Load)
|
|
|
|
Mode.push_back(OpMode::Load);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
Mode.push_back(OpMode::Opcode);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned Lane = 1, E = MultiNodeOps[0].second.size(); Lane < E; ++Lane) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Finding best value for lane " << Lane << "\n");
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<VPValue *, 4> Candidates;
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Candidates ");
|
|
|
|
for (auto Ops : MultiNodeOps) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(
|
|
|
|
dbgs() << *cast<VPInstruction>(Ops.second[Lane])->getUnderlyingInstr()
|
|
|
|
<< " ");
|
2018-11-14 16:58:40 +01:00
|
|
|
Candidates.insert(Ops.second[Lane]);
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned Op = 0, E = MultiNodeOps.size(); Op < E; ++Op) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Checking " << Op << "\n");
|
|
|
|
if (Mode[Op] == OpMode::Failed)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VPValue *Last = FinalOrder[Op].second[Lane - 1];
|
|
|
|
std::pair<OpMode, VPValue *> Res =
|
|
|
|
getBest(Mode[Op], Last, Candidates, IAI);
|
|
|
|
if (Res.second)
|
|
|
|
FinalOrder[Op].second.push_back(Res.second);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
// TODO: handle this case
|
|
|
|
FinalOrder[Op].second.push_back(markFailed());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return FinalOrder;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void VPlanSlp::dumpBundle(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Values) {
|
2018-11-14 14:33:44 +01:00
|
|
|
dbgs() << " Ops: ";
|
2019-09-16 13:22:44 +02:00
|
|
|
for (auto Op : Values) {
|
|
|
|
if (auto *VPInstr = cast_or_null<VPInstruction>(Op))
|
|
|
|
if (auto *Instr = VPInstr->getUnderlyingInstr()) {
|
|
|
|
dbgs() << *Instr << " | ";
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
dbgs() << " nullptr | ";
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-14 14:33:44 +01:00
|
|
|
dbgs() << "\n";
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VPInstruction *VPlanSlp::buildGraph(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Values) {
|
|
|
|
assert(!Values.empty() && "Need some operands!");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we already visited this instruction bundle, re-use the existing node
|
|
|
|
auto I = BundleToCombined.find(to_vector<4>(Values));
|
|
|
|
if (I != BundleToCombined.end()) {
|
2018-11-14 14:21:26 +01:00
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
// Check that the resulting graph is a tree. If we re-use a node, this means
|
|
|
|
// its values have multiple users. We only allow this, if all users of each
|
|
|
|
// value are the same instruction.
|
|
|
|
for (auto *V : Values) {
|
|
|
|
auto UI = V->user_begin();
|
|
|
|
auto *FirstUser = *UI++;
|
2018-11-14 14:21:26 +01:00
|
|
|
while (UI != V->user_end()) {
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
assert(*UI == FirstUser && "Currently we only support SLP trees.");
|
|
|
|
UI++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
return I->second;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Dump inputs
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG({
|
|
|
|
dbgs() << "buildGraph: ";
|
|
|
|
dumpBundle(Values);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!areVectorizable(Values))
|
|
|
|
return markFailed();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(getOpcode(Values) && "Opcodes for all values must match");
|
|
|
|
unsigned ValuesOpcode = getOpcode(Values).getValue();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<VPValue *, 4> CombinedOperands;
|
|
|
|
if (areCommutative(Values)) {
|
|
|
|
bool MultiNodeRoot = !MultiNodeActive;
|
|
|
|
MultiNodeActive = true;
|
|
|
|
for (auto &Operands : getOperands(Values)) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG({
|
|
|
|
dbgs() << " Visiting Commutative";
|
|
|
|
dumpBundle(Operands);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto OperandsOpcode = getOpcode(Operands);
|
|
|
|
if (OperandsOpcode && OperandsOpcode == getOpcode(Values)) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Same opcode, continue building\n");
|
|
|
|
CombinedOperands.push_back(buildGraph(Operands));
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Adding multinode Ops\n");
|
|
|
|
// Create dummy VPInstruction, which will we replace later by the
|
|
|
|
// re-ordered operand.
|
|
|
|
VPInstruction *Op = new VPInstruction(0, {});
|
|
|
|
CombinedOperands.push_back(Op);
|
|
|
|
MultiNodeOps.emplace_back(Op, Operands);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (MultiNodeRoot) {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Reorder \n");
|
|
|
|
MultiNodeActive = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto FinalOrder = reorderMultiNodeOps();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MultiNodeOps.clear();
|
|
|
|
for (auto &Ops : FinalOrder) {
|
|
|
|
VPInstruction *NewOp = buildGraph(Ops.second);
|
|
|
|
Ops.first->replaceAllUsesWith(NewOp);
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < CombinedOperands.size(); i++)
|
|
|
|
if (CombinedOperands[i] == Ops.first)
|
|
|
|
CombinedOperands[i] = NewOp;
|
|
|
|
delete Ops.first;
|
|
|
|
Ops.first = NewOp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Found final order\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " NonCommuntative\n");
|
|
|
|
if (ValuesOpcode == Instruction::Load)
|
|
|
|
for (VPValue *V : Values)
|
|
|
|
CombinedOperands.push_back(cast<VPInstruction>(V)->getOperand(0));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
for (auto &Operands : getOperands(Values))
|
|
|
|
CombinedOperands.push_back(buildGraph(Operands));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned Opcode;
|
|
|
|
switch (ValuesOpcode) {
|
|
|
|
case Instruction::Load:
|
|
|
|
Opcode = VPInstruction::SLPLoad;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case Instruction::Store:
|
|
|
|
Opcode = VPInstruction::SLPStore;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
Opcode = ValuesOpcode;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!CompletelySLP)
|
|
|
|
return markFailed();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(CombinedOperands.size() > 0 && "Need more some operands");
|
|
|
|
auto *VPI = new VPInstruction(Opcode, CombinedOperands);
|
|
|
|
VPI->setUnderlyingInstr(cast<VPInstruction>(Values[0])->getUnderlyingInstr());
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-23 16:44:50 +01:00
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Create VPInstruction " << *VPI << " "
|
|
|
|
<< *cast<VPInstruction>(Values[0]) << "\n");
|
[VPlan, SLP] Add simple SLP analysis on top of VPlan.
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
2018-11-14 14:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
addCombined(Values, VPI);
|
|
|
|
return VPI;
|
|
|
|
}
|