RPCS3/llvm-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-23 19:23:23 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
fe1657d8ae
llvm-mirror/test/Verifier/metadata-function-dbg.ll

31 lines
787 B
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

DI: Add Function::getSubprogram() Add `Function::setSubprogram()` and `Function::getSubprogram()`, convenience methods to forward to `setMetadata()` and `getMetadata()`, respectively, and deal in `DISubprogram` instead of `MDNode`. Also add a verifier check to enforce that `!dbg` attachments are always subprograms. Originally (when I had the llvm-dev discussion back in April) I thought I'd store a pointer directly on `llvm::Function` for these attachments -- we frequently have debug info, and that's much cheaper than using map in the context if there are no other function-level attachments -- but for now I'm just using the generic infrastructure. Let's add the extra complexity only if this shows up in a profile. llvm-svn: 246339
2015-08-28 23:55:35 +02:00
; RUN: not llvm-as %s -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
IR: Allow metadata attachments on declarations, and fix lazy loaded metadata issue with globals. This change is motivated by an upcoming change to the metadata representation used for CFI. The indirect function call checker needs type information for external function declarations in order to correctly generate jump table entries for such declarations. We currently associate such type information with declarations using a global metadata node, but I plan [1] to move all such metadata to global object attachments. In bitcode, metadata attachments for function declarations appear in the global metadata block. This seems reasonable to me because I expect metadata attachments on declarations to be uncommon. In the long term I'd also expect this to be the case for CFI, because we'd want to use some specialized bitcode format for this metadata that could be read as part of the ThinLTO thin-link phase, which would mean that it would not appear in the global metadata block. To solve the lazy loaded metadata issue I was seeing with D20147, I use the same bitcode representation for metadata attachments for global variables as I do for function declarations. Since there's a use case for metadata attachments in the global metadata block, we might as well use that representation for global variables as well, at least until we have a mechanism for lazy loading global variables. In the assembly format, the metadata attachments appear after the "declare" keyword in order to avoid a parsing ambiguity. [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100462.html Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21052 llvm-svn: 273336
2016-06-22 01:42:48 +02:00
; CHECK: function declaration may not have a !dbg attachment
declare !dbg !4 void @f1()
define void @f2() !dbg !4 {
IR: Allow multiple global metadata attachments with the same type. This will be necessary to allow the global merge pass to attach multiple debug info metadata nodes to global variables once we reverse the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20414 llvm-svn: 271358
2016-06-01 03:17:57 +02:00
unreachable
}
; CHECK: function must have a single !dbg attachment
IR: Allow metadata attachments on declarations, and fix lazy loaded metadata issue with globals. This change is motivated by an upcoming change to the metadata representation used for CFI. The indirect function call checker needs type information for external function declarations in order to correctly generate jump table entries for such declarations. We currently associate such type information with declarations using a global metadata node, but I plan [1] to move all such metadata to global object attachments. In bitcode, metadata attachments for function declarations appear in the global metadata block. This seems reasonable to me because I expect metadata attachments on declarations to be uncommon. In the long term I'd also expect this to be the case for CFI, because we'd want to use some specialized bitcode format for this metadata that could be read as part of the ThinLTO thin-link phase, which would mean that it would not appear in the global metadata block. To solve the lazy loaded metadata issue I was seeing with D20147, I use the same bitcode representation for metadata attachments for global variables as I do for function declarations. Since there's a use case for metadata attachments in the global metadata block, we might as well use that representation for global variables as well, at least until we have a mechanism for lazy loading global variables. In the assembly format, the metadata attachments appear after the "declare" keyword in order to avoid a parsing ambiguity. [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100462.html Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21052 llvm-svn: 273336
2016-06-22 01:42:48 +02:00
define void @f3() !dbg !4 !dbg !4 {
DI: Add Function::getSubprogram() Add `Function::setSubprogram()` and `Function::getSubprogram()`, convenience methods to forward to `setMetadata()` and `getMetadata()`, respectively, and deal in `DISubprogram` instead of `MDNode`. Also add a verifier check to enforce that `!dbg` attachments are always subprograms. Originally (when I had the llvm-dev discussion back in April) I thought I'd store a pointer directly on `llvm::Function` for these attachments -- we frequently have debug info, and that's much cheaper than using map in the context if there are no other function-level attachments -- but for now I'm just using the generic infrastructure. Let's add the extra complexity only if this shows up in a profile. llvm-svn: 246339
2015-08-28 23:55:35 +02:00
unreachable
}
; CHECK-NOT: !dbg
; CHECK: function !dbg attachment must be a subprogram
; CHECK-NEXT: void ()* @bar
; CHECK-NEXT: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{}
define void @bar() !dbg !6 {
unreachable
}
!llvm.module.flags = !{!0}
!0 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1}
[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram. Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing. Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info. Motivation ---------- Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when doing a ThinLTO build of clang. We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a reference the block containing the inlined subprogram. Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034 <rdar://problem/25256815> llvm-svn: 266446
2016-04-15 17:57:41 +02:00
!1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2)
DI: Add Function::getSubprogram() Add `Function::setSubprogram()` and `Function::getSubprogram()`, convenience methods to forward to `setMetadata()` and `getMetadata()`, respectively, and deal in `DISubprogram` instead of `MDNode`. Also add a verifier check to enforce that `!dbg` attachments are always subprograms. Originally (when I had the llvm-dev discussion back in April) I thought I'd store a pointer directly on `llvm::Function` for these attachments -- we frequently have debug info, and that's much cheaper than using map in the context if there are no other function-level attachments -- but for now I'm just using the generic infrastructure. Let's add the extra complexity only if this shows up in a profile. llvm-svn: 246339
2015-08-28 23:55:35 +02:00
!2 = !DIFile(filename: "t.c", directory: "/path/to/dir")
[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram. Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing. Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info. Motivation ---------- Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when doing a ThinLTO build of clang. We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a reference the block containing the inlined subprogram. Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034 <rdar://problem/25256815> llvm-svn: 266446
2016-04-15 17:57:41 +02:00
!4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !2, unit: !1)
DI: Add Function::getSubprogram() Add `Function::setSubprogram()` and `Function::getSubprogram()`, convenience methods to forward to `setMetadata()` and `getMetadata()`, respectively, and deal in `DISubprogram` instead of `MDNode`. Also add a verifier check to enforce that `!dbg` attachments are always subprograms. Originally (when I had the llvm-dev discussion back in April) I thought I'd store a pointer directly on `llvm::Function` for these attachments -- we frequently have debug info, and that's much cheaper than using map in the context if there are no other function-level attachments -- but for now I'm just using the generic infrastructure. Let's add the extra complexity only if this shows up in a profile. llvm-svn: 246339
2015-08-28 23:55:35 +02:00
!6 = !{}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink