mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-25 04:02:41 +01:00
[X86] Prevent folding loads with 64-bit ANDs with immediates that fit in 32-bits.
Prefer to use the 32-bit AND with immediate instead. Primarily I'm doing this to ensure that immediates created by shrinkAndImmediate will always get absorbed into the AND. But I do believe this would be a reduction in the number of uops that need to execute. Ideally we should shrink the 'and' and the 'load' during DAG combine to re-enable the fold. Fixes PR37063. llvm-svn: 329667
This commit is contained in:
parent
68365a2ff5
commit
124ae55576
@ -525,10 +525,21 @@ X86DAGToDAGISel::IsProfitableToFold(SDValue N, SDNode *U, SDNode *Root) const {
|
||||
// addl 4(%esp), %eax
|
||||
// The former is 2 bytes shorter. In case where the increment is 1, then
|
||||
// the saving can be 4 bytes (by using incl %eax).
|
||||
if (ConstantSDNode *Imm = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op1))
|
||||
if (ConstantSDNode *Imm = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op1)) {
|
||||
if (Imm->getAPIntValue().isSignedIntN(8))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// If this is a 64-bit AND with an immediate that fits in 32-bits,
|
||||
// prefer using the smaller and over folding the load. This is needed to
|
||||
// make sure immediates created by shrinkAndImmediate are always folded.
|
||||
// Ideally we would narrow the load during DAG combine and get the
|
||||
// best of both worlds.
|
||||
if (U->getOpcode() == ISD::AND &&
|
||||
Imm->getAPIntValue().getBitWidth() == 64 &&
|
||||
Imm->getAPIntValue().isIntN(32))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the other operand is a TLS address, we should fold it instead.
|
||||
// This produces
|
||||
// movl %gs:0, %eax
|
||||
|
31
test/CodeGen/X86/pr37063.ll
Normal file
31
test/CodeGen/X86/pr37063.ll
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
|
||||
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
declare void @bar()
|
||||
|
||||
define void @foo(i64*) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: foo:
|
||||
; CHECK: # %bb.0: # %start
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: movq (%rdi), %rax
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: andl $-2, %eax
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: cmpq $4, %rax
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: jne .LBB0_2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.1: # %bb1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: retq
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: .LBB0_2: # %bb2.i
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: jmp bar # TAILCALL
|
||||
start:
|
||||
%1 = load i64, i64* %0, align 8, !range !0
|
||||
%2 = and i64 %1, 6
|
||||
%3 = icmp eq i64 %2, 4
|
||||
br i1 %3, label %bb1, label %bb2.i
|
||||
|
||||
bb1: ; preds = %bb2.i, %start
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
|
||||
bb2.i: ; preds = %start
|
||||
tail call fastcc void @bar()
|
||||
br label %bb1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
!0 = !{i64 0, i64 6}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user