mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-23 19:23:23 +01:00
Remove a couple of useless functions.
llvm-svn: 72516
This commit is contained in:
parent
bdd4f7f8d3
commit
1527c49c0d
@ -136,15 +136,8 @@ private:
|
||||
bool LegalizeAllNodesNotLeadingTo(SDNode *N, SDNode *Dest,
|
||||
SmallPtrSet<SDNode*, 32> &NodesLeadingTo);
|
||||
|
||||
void LegalizeSetCCOperands(SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS, SDValue &CC,
|
||||
DebugLoc dl);
|
||||
void LegalizeSetCCCondCode(MVT VT, SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS, SDValue &CC,
|
||||
DebugLoc dl);
|
||||
void LegalizeSetCC(MVT VT, SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS, SDValue &CC,
|
||||
DebugLoc dl) {
|
||||
LegalizeSetCCOperands(LHS, RHS, CC, dl);
|
||||
LegalizeSetCCCondCode(VT, LHS, RHS, CC, dl);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SDValue ExpandLibCall(RTLIB::Libcall LC, SDNode *Node, bool isSigned);
|
||||
SDValue ExpandFPLibCall(SDNode *Node, RTLIB::Libcall Call_F32,
|
||||
@ -1624,20 +1617,6 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandDYNAMIC_STACKALLOC(SDNode* Node,
|
||||
Results.push_back(Tmp2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// LegalizeSetCCOperands - Attempts to create a legal LHS and RHS for a SETCC
|
||||
/// with condition CC on the current target. This usually involves legalizing
|
||||
/// or promoting the arguments. In the case where LHS and RHS must be expanded,
|
||||
/// there may be no choice but to create a new SetCC node to represent the
|
||||
/// legalized value of setcc lhs, rhs. In this case, the value is returned in
|
||||
/// LHS, and the SDValue returned in RHS has a nil SDNode value.
|
||||
void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands(SDValue &LHS,
|
||||
SDValue &RHS,
|
||||
SDValue &CC,
|
||||
DebugLoc dl) {
|
||||
LHS = LegalizeOp(LHS);
|
||||
RHS = LegalizeOp(RHS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// LegalizeSetCCCondCode - Legalize a SETCC with given LHS and RHS and
|
||||
/// condition code CC on the current target. This routine assumes LHS and rHS
|
||||
/// have already been legalized by LegalizeSetCCOperands. It expands SETCC with
|
||||
@ -2897,7 +2876,7 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node,
|
||||
Tmp1 = Node->getOperand(0);
|
||||
Tmp2 = Node->getOperand(1);
|
||||
Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(2);
|
||||
LegalizeSetCC(Node->getValueType(0), Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3, dl);
|
||||
LegalizeSetCCCondCode(Node->getValueType(0), Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3, dl);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we expanded the SETCC into an AND/OR, return the new node
|
||||
if (Tmp2.getNode() == 0) {
|
||||
@ -2920,8 +2899,8 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node,
|
||||
Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(3); // False
|
||||
SDValue CC = Node->getOperand(4);
|
||||
|
||||
LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()),
|
||||
Tmp1, Tmp2, CC, dl);
|
||||
LegalizeSetCCCondCode(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()),
|
||||
Tmp1, Tmp2, CC, dl);
|
||||
|
||||
assert(!Tmp2.getNode() && "Can't legalize SELECT_CC with legal condition!");
|
||||
Tmp2 = DAG.getConstant(0, Tmp1.getValueType());
|
||||
@ -2937,18 +2916,11 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node,
|
||||
Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(3); // RHS
|
||||
Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(1); // CC
|
||||
|
||||
LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp2.getValueType()),
|
||||
Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4, dl);
|
||||
LegalizeSetCCCondCode(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp2.getValueType()),
|
||||
Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4, dl);
|
||||
LastCALLSEQ_END = DAG.getEntryNode();
|
||||
|
||||
// If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC,
|
||||
// the LHS is a legal SETCC itself. In this case, we need to compare
|
||||
// the result against zero to select between true and false values.
|
||||
if (Tmp3.getNode() == 0) {
|
||||
Tmp3 = DAG.getConstant(0, Tmp2.getValueType());
|
||||
Tmp4 = DAG.getCondCode(ISD::SETNE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert(!Tmp2.getNode() && "Can't legalize BR_CC with legal condition!");
|
||||
Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BR_CC, dl, Node->getValueType(0), Tmp1, Tmp4, Tmp2,
|
||||
Tmp3, Node->getOperand(4));
|
||||
Results.push_back(Tmp1);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user