mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-22 02:33:06 +01:00
Revert "[SCEV] Handle zero stride correctly in howManyLessThans"
This reverts commit 4df591b5c960affd1612e330d0c9cd3076c18053. Causes crashes, see comments on D105921.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f6c8f9557
commit
222304d82f
@ -11653,30 +11653,6 @@ ScalarEvolution::howManyLessThans(const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
|
||||
if (PredicatedIV || !NoWrap || isKnownNonPositive(Stride) ||
|
||||
!loopIsFiniteByAssumption(L))
|
||||
return getCouldNotCompute();
|
||||
|
||||
// We allow a potentially zero stride, but we need to divide by stride
|
||||
// below. Since the loop can't be infinite and this check must control
|
||||
// the sole exit, we can infer the exit must be taken on the first
|
||||
// iteration (e.g. backedge count = 0) if the stride is zero. Given that,
|
||||
// we know the numerator in the divides below must be zero, so we can
|
||||
// pick an arbitrary non-zero value for the denominator (e.g. stride)
|
||||
// and produce the right result.
|
||||
// FIXME: Handle the case where Stride is poison?
|
||||
auto wouldZeroStrideBeUB = [&]() {
|
||||
// Proof by contradiction. Suppose the stride were zero. If we can
|
||||
// prove that the backedge *is* taken on the first iteration, then since
|
||||
// we know this condition controls the sole exit, we must have an
|
||||
// infinite loop. We can't have a (well defined) infinite loop per
|
||||
// check just above.
|
||||
// Note: The (Start - Stride) term is used to get the start' term from
|
||||
// (start' + stride,+,stride). Remember that we only care about the
|
||||
// result of this expression when stride == 0 at runtime.
|
||||
auto *StartIfZero = getMinusSCEV(IV->getStart(), Stride);
|
||||
return isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, Cond, StartIfZero, RHS);
|
||||
};
|
||||
if (!isKnownNonZero(Stride) && !wouldZeroStrideBeUB()) {
|
||||
Stride = getUMaxExpr(Stride, getOne(Stride->getType()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (!Stride->isOne() && !NoWrap) {
|
||||
auto isUBOnWrap = [&]() {
|
||||
// Can we prove this loop *must* be UB if overflow of IV occurs?
|
||||
|
@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.body, %entry
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
; Check that we are able to compute trip count of a loop without an entry guard.
|
||||
; CHECK: Determining loop execution counts for: @foo2
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (-1 * %s) + (1 umax %s) + (%n smax %s)) /u (1 umax %s))
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: Determining loop execution counts for: @foo2
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (%n smax %s)) /u %s)
|
||||
|
||||
; We should have a conservative estimate for the max backedge taken count for
|
||||
; loops with unknown stride.
|
||||
@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.body, %entry
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; Same as foo2, but with mustprogress on loop, not function
|
||||
; CHECK: Determining loop execution counts for: @foo4
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (-1 * %s) + (1 umax %s) + (%n smax %s)) /u (1 umax %s))
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: Determining loop execution counts for: @foo4
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (%n smax %s)) /u %s)
|
||||
; CHECK: max backedge-taken count is -1
|
||||
|
||||
define void @foo4(i32* nocapture %A, i32 %n, i32 %s) {
|
||||
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.body, %entry
|
||||
|
||||
; A more complex case with pre-increment compare instead of post-increment.
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: Determining loop execution counts for: @foo5
|
||||
; CHECK: Loop %for.body: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (-1 * %start) + (1 umax %s) + (%n smax %start)) /u (1 umax %s))
|
||||
; CHECK: Loop %for.body: backedge-taken count is ((-1 + (-1 * %start) + (%n smax %start) + %s) /u %s)
|
||||
|
||||
; We should have a conservative estimate for the max backedge taken count for
|
||||
; loops with unknown stride.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user