mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-25 12:12:47 +01:00
[NFC] Rename isKnownViaSimpleReasoning to isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning
llvm-svn: 325216
This commit is contained in:
parent
f098039f09
commit
2fec5b71da
@ -1591,8 +1591,8 @@ private:
|
||||
|
||||
/// Test whether the condition described by Pred, LHS, and RHS is true.
|
||||
/// Use only simple non-recursive types of checks, such as range analysis etc.
|
||||
bool isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS);
|
||||
bool isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Test whether the condition described by Pred, LHS, and RHS is true
|
||||
/// whenever the condition described by Pred, FoundLHS, and FoundRHS is
|
||||
|
@ -8694,7 +8694,7 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise see what can be done with some simple reasoning.
|
||||
return isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
return isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ScalarEvolution::isMonotonicPredicate(const SCEVAddRecExpr *LHS,
|
||||
@ -8961,7 +8961,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
|
||||
// (interprocedural conditions notwithstanding).
|
||||
if (!L) return true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS))
|
||||
if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *Latch = L->getLoopLatch();
|
||||
@ -9072,7 +9072,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
|
||||
assert(isAvailableAtLoopEntry(RHS, L) &&
|
||||
"RHS is not available at Loop Entry");
|
||||
|
||||
if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS))
|
||||
if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// If we cannot prove strict comparison (e.g. a > b), maybe we can prove
|
||||
@ -9087,9 +9087,9 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
|
||||
|
||||
if (ProvingStrictComparison) {
|
||||
ProvedNonStrictComparison =
|
||||
isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(NonStrictPredicate, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(NonStrictPredicate, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
ProvedNonEquality =
|
||||
isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
if (ProvedNonStrictComparison && ProvedNonEquality)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -9644,7 +9644,7 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedViaOperations(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
|
||||
// Is the SGT predicate can be proved trivially or using the found context.
|
||||
auto IsSGTViaContext = [&](const SCEV *S1, const SCEV *S2) {
|
||||
return isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, S1, S2) ||
|
||||
return isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, S1, S2) ||
|
||||
isImpliedViaOperations(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, S1, S2, OrigFoundLHS,
|
||||
FoundRHS, Depth + 1);
|
||||
};
|
||||
@ -9749,7 +9749,7 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedViaOperations(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
ScalarEvolution::isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
ScalarEvolution::isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS) {
|
||||
return isKnownPredicateViaConstantRanges(Pred, LHS, RHS) ||
|
||||
IsKnownPredicateViaMinOrMax(*this, Pred, LHS, RHS) ||
|
||||
@ -9771,26 +9771,26 @@ ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
||||
if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
||||
if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
||||
if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
|
||||
if (isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaSimpleReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHS, FoundLHS) &&
|
||||
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, RHS, FoundRHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user