1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-24 03:33:20 +01:00

Implement SimplifyCFG/PhiEliminate.ll

Having a proper 'select' instruction would allow the elimination of a lot
of the special case cruft in this patch, but we don't have one yet.

llvm-svn: 11307
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2004-02-11 03:36:04 +00:00
parent f2488237c1
commit 4418633216

View File

@ -12,11 +12,8 @@
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
#include "llvm/Constant.h"
#include "llvm/Intrinsics.h"
#include "llvm/iPHINode.h"
#include "llvm/iTerminators.h"
#include "llvm/iOther.h"
#include "llvm/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>
@ -89,6 +86,119 @@ static bool PropagatePredecessorsForPHIs(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *Succ) {
return false;
}
/// GetIfCondition - Given a basic block (BB) with two predecessors (and
/// presumably PHI nodes in it), check to see if the merge at this block is due
/// to an "if condition". If so, return the boolean condition that determines
/// which entry into BB will be taken. Also, return by references the block
/// that will be entered from if the condition is true, and the block that will
/// be entered if the condition is false.
///
///
static Value *GetIfCondition(BasicBlock *BB,
BasicBlock *&IfTrue, BasicBlock *&IfFalse) {
assert(std::distance(pred_begin(BB), pred_end(BB)) == 2 &&
"Function can only handle blocks with 2 predecessors!");
BasicBlock *Pred1 = *pred_begin(BB);
BasicBlock *Pred2 = *++pred_begin(BB);
// We can only handle branches. Other control flow will be lowered to
// branches if possible anyway.
if (!isa<BranchInst>(Pred1->getTerminator()) ||
!isa<BranchInst>(Pred2->getTerminator()))
return 0;
BranchInst *Pred1Br = cast<BranchInst>(Pred1->getTerminator());
BranchInst *Pred2Br = cast<BranchInst>(Pred2->getTerminator());
// Eliminate code duplication by ensuring that Pred1Br is conditional if
// either are.
if (Pred2Br->isConditional()) {
// If both branches are conditional, we don't have an "if statement". In
// reality, we could transform this case, but since the condition will be
// required anyway, we stand no chance of eliminating it, so the xform is
// probably not profitable.
if (Pred1Br->isConditional())
return 0;
std::swap(Pred1, Pred2);
std::swap(Pred1Br, Pred2Br);
}
if (Pred1Br->isConditional()) {
// If we found a conditional branch predecessor, make sure that it branches
// to BB and Pred2Br. If it doesn't, this isn't an "if statement".
if (Pred1Br->getSuccessor(0) == BB &&
Pred1Br->getSuccessor(1) == Pred2) {
IfTrue = Pred1;
IfFalse = Pred2;
} else if (Pred1Br->getSuccessor(0) == Pred2 &&
Pred1Br->getSuccessor(1) == BB) {
IfTrue = Pred2;
IfFalse = Pred1;
} else {
// We know that one arm of the conditional goes to BB, so the other must
// go somewhere unrelated, and this must not be an "if statement".
return 0;
}
// The only thing we have to watch out for here is to make sure that Pred2
// doesn't have incoming edges from other blocks. If it does, the condition
// doesn't dominate BB.
if (++pred_begin(Pred2) != pred_end(Pred2))
return 0;
return Pred1Br->getCondition();
}
// Ok, if we got here, both predecessors end with an unconditional branch to
// BB. Don't panic! If both blocks only have a single (identical)
// predecessor, and THAT is a conditional branch, then we're all ok!
if (pred_begin(Pred1) == pred_end(Pred1) ||
++pred_begin(Pred1) != pred_end(Pred1) ||
pred_begin(Pred2) == pred_end(Pred2) ||
++pred_begin(Pred2) != pred_end(Pred2) ||
*pred_begin(Pred1) != *pred_begin(Pred2))
return 0;
// Otherwise, if this is a conditional branch, then we can use it!
BasicBlock *CommonPred = *pred_begin(Pred1);
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(CommonPred->getTerminator())) {
assert(BI->isConditional() && "Two successors but not conditional?");
if (BI->getSuccessor(0) == Pred1) {
IfTrue = Pred1;
IfFalse = Pred2;
} else {
IfTrue = Pred2;
IfFalse = Pred1;
}
return BI->getCondition();
}
return 0;
}
// If we have a merge point of an "if condition" as accepted above, return true
// if the specified value dominates the block. We don't handle the true
// generality of domination here, just a special case which works well enough
// for us.
static bool DominatesMergePoint(Value *V, BasicBlock *BB) {
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V)) {
BasicBlock *PBB = I->getParent();
// If this instruction is defined in a block that contains an unconditional
// branch to BB, then it must be in the 'conditional' part of the "if
// statement".
if (isa<BranchInst>(PBB->getTerminator()) &&
cast<BranchInst>(PBB->getTerminator())->isUnconditional() &&
cast<BranchInst>(PBB->getTerminator())->getSuccessor(0) == BB)
return false;
// We also don't want to allow wierd loops that might have the "if
// condition" in the bottom of this block.
if (PBB == BB) return false;
}
// Non-instructions all dominate instructions.
return true;
}
// SimplifyCFG - This function is used to do simplification of a CFG. For
// example, it adjusts branches to branches to eliminate the extra hop, it
@ -293,6 +403,125 @@ bool llvm::SimplifyCFG(BasicBlock *BB) {
return true;
}
// If there is a trivial two-entry PHI node in this basic block, and we can
// eliminate it, do so now.
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BB->begin()))
if (PN->getNumIncomingValues() == 2) {
// Ok, this is a two entry PHI node. Check to see if this is a simple "if
// statement", which has a very simple dominance structure. Basically, we
// are trying to find the condition that is being branched on, which
// subsequently causes this merge to happen. We really want control
// dependence information for this check, but simplifycfg can't keep it up
// to date, and this catches most of the cases we care about anyway.
//
BasicBlock *IfTrue, *IfFalse;
if (Value *IfCond = GetIfCondition(BB, IfTrue, IfFalse)) {
//std::cerr << "FOUND IF CONDITION! " << *IfCond << " T: "
// << IfTrue->getName() << " F: " << IfFalse->getName() << "\n";
// Figure out where to insert instructions as necessary.
BasicBlock::iterator AfterPHIIt = BB->begin();
while (isa<PHINode>(AfterPHIIt)) ++AfterPHIIt;
BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin();
while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I)) {
++I;
// If we can eliminate this PHI by directly computing it based on the
// condition, do so now. We can't eliminate PHI nodes where the
// incoming values are defined in the conditional parts of the branch,
// so check for this.
//
if (DominatesMergePoint(PN->getIncomingValue(0), BB) &&
DominatesMergePoint(PN->getIncomingValue(1), BB)) {
Value *TrueVal =
PN->getIncomingValue(PN->getIncomingBlock(0) == IfFalse);
Value *FalseVal =
PN->getIncomingValue(PN->getIncomingBlock(0) == IfTrue);
// FIXME: when we have a 'select' statement, we can be completely
// generic and clean here and let the instcombine pass clean up
// after us, by folding the select instructions away when possible.
//
if (TrueVal == FalseVal) {
// Degenerate case...
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(TrueVal);
BB->getInstList().erase(PN);
Changed = true;
} else if (isa<ConstantBool>(TrueVal) &&
isa<ConstantBool>(FalseVal)) {
if (TrueVal == ConstantBool::True) {
// The PHI node produces the same thing as the condition.
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(IfCond);
} else {
// The PHI node produces the inverse of the condition. Insert a
// "NOT" instruction, which is really a XOR.
Value *InverseCond =
BinaryOperator::createNot(IfCond, IfCond->getName()+".inv",
AfterPHIIt);
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(InverseCond);
}
BB->getInstList().erase(PN);
Changed = true;
} else if (isa<ConstantInt>(TrueVal) && isa<ConstantInt>(FalseVal)){
// If this is a PHI of two constant integers, we insert a cast of
// the boolean to the integer type in question, giving us 0 or 1.
// Then we multiply this by the difference of the two constants,
// giving us 0 if false, and the difference if true. We add this
// result to the base constant, giving us our final value. We
// rely on the instruction combiner to eliminate many special
// cases, like turning multiplies into shifts when possible.
std::string Name = PN->getName(); PN->setName("");
Value *TheCast = new CastInst(IfCond, TrueVal->getType(),
Name, AfterPHIIt);
Constant *TheDiff = ConstantExpr::get(Instruction::Sub,
cast<Constant>(TrueVal),
cast<Constant>(FalseVal));
Value *V = TheCast;
if (TheDiff != ConstantInt::get(TrueVal->getType(), 1))
V = BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Mul, TheCast,
TheDiff, TheCast->getName()+".scale",
AfterPHIIt);
if (!cast<Constant>(FalseVal)->isNullValue())
V = BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Add, V, FalseVal,
V->getName()+".offs", AfterPHIIt);
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
BB->getInstList().erase(PN);
Changed = true;
} else if (isa<ConstantInt>(FalseVal) &&
cast<Constant>(FalseVal)->isNullValue()) {
// If the false condition is an integral zero value, we can
// compute the PHI by multiplying the condition by the other
// value.
std::string Name = PN->getName(); PN->setName("");
Value *TheCast = new CastInst(IfCond, TrueVal->getType(),
Name+".c", AfterPHIIt);
Value *V = BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Mul, TrueVal,
TheCast, Name, AfterPHIIt);
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
BB->getInstList().erase(PN);
Changed = true;
} else if (isa<ConstantInt>(TrueVal) &&
cast<Constant>(TrueVal)->isNullValue()) {
// If the true condition is an integral zero value, we can compute
// the PHI by multiplying the inverse condition by the other
// value.
std::string Name = PN->getName(); PN->setName("");
Value *NotCond = BinaryOperator::createNot(IfCond, Name+".inv",
AfterPHIIt);
Value *TheCast = new CastInst(NotCond, TrueVal->getType(),
Name+".inv", AfterPHIIt);
Value *V = BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Mul, FalseVal,
TheCast, Name, AfterPHIIt);
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
BB->getInstList().erase(PN);
Changed = true;
}
}
}
}
}
return Changed;
}