1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2025-01-31 20:51:52 +01:00

[X86] Fold (setcc (cmp (atomic_load_add x, -C) C), COND) to (setcc (LADD x, -C), COND) (PR31367)

atomic_load_add returns the value before addition, but sets EFLAGS based on the
result of the addition. That means it's setting the flags based on effectively
subtracting C from the value at x, which is also what the outer cmp does.

This targets a pattern that occurs frequently with reference counting pointers:

  void decrement(long volatile *ptr) {
    if (_InterlockedDecrement(ptr) == 0)
      release();
  }

Clang would previously compile it (for 32-bit at -Os) as:

00000000 <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z>:
   0:   8b 44 24 04             mov    0x4(%esp),%eax
   4:   31 c9                   xor    %ecx,%ecx
   6:   49                      dec    %ecx
   7:   f0 0f c1 08             lock xadd %ecx,(%eax)
   b:   83 f9 01                cmp    $0x1,%ecx
   e:   0f 84 00 00 00 00       je     14 <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z+0x14>
  14:   c3                      ret

and with this patch it becomes:

00000000 <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z>:
   0:   8b 44 24 04             mov    0x4(%esp),%eax
   4:   f0 ff 08                lock decl (%eax)
   7:   0f 84 00 00 00 00       je     d <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z+0xd>
   d:   c3                      ret

(Equivalent variants with _InterlockedExchangeAdd, std::atomic<>'s fetch_add
or pre-decrement operator generate the same code.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27781

llvm-svn: 289955
This commit is contained in:
Hans Wennborg 2016-12-16 16:34:59 +00:00
parent 92b32384c1
commit 4441124e06
2 changed files with 61 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -28879,11 +28879,19 @@ static SDValue combineSelect(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
return SDValue();
}
/// Combine:
/// Combine brcond/cmov/setcc/.. based on comparing the result of
/// atomic_load_add to use EFLAGS produced by the addition
/// directly if possible. For example:
///
/// (setcc (cmp (atomic_load_add x, -C) C), COND_E)
/// becomes:
/// (setcc (LADD x, -C), COND_E)
///
/// and
/// (brcond/cmov/setcc .., (cmp (atomic_load_add x, 1), 0), COND_S)
/// to:
/// becomes:
/// (brcond/cmov/setcc .., (LADD x, 1), COND_LE)
/// i.e., reusing the EFLAGS produced by the LOCKed instruction.
///
/// Note that this is only legal for some op/cc combinations.
static SDValue combineSetCCAtomicArith(SDValue Cmp, X86::CondCode &CC,
SelectionDAG &DAG) {
@ -28892,7 +28900,7 @@ static SDValue combineSetCCAtomicArith(SDValue Cmp, X86::CondCode &CC,
(Cmp.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB && !Cmp->hasAnyUseOfValue(0))))
return SDValue();
// This only applies to variations of the common case:
// This applies to variations of the common case:
// (icmp slt x, 0) -> (icmp sle (add x, 1), 0)
// (icmp sge x, 0) -> (icmp sgt (add x, 1), 0)
// (icmp sle x, 0) -> (icmp slt (sub x, 1), 0)
@ -28911,8 +28919,9 @@ static SDValue combineSetCCAtomicArith(SDValue Cmp, X86::CondCode &CC,
return SDValue();
auto *CmpRHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(CmpRHS);
if (!CmpRHSC || CmpRHSC->getZExtValue() != 0)
if (!CmpRHSC)
return SDValue();
APInt Comparand = CmpRHSC->getAPIntValue();
const unsigned Opc = CmpLHS.getOpcode();
@ -28928,13 +28937,15 @@ static SDValue combineSetCCAtomicArith(SDValue Cmp, X86::CondCode &CC,
if (Opc == ISD::ATOMIC_LOAD_SUB)
Addend = -Addend;
if (CC == X86::COND_S && Addend == 1)
if (Comparand == -Addend)
CC = CC; // No change.
else if (CC == X86::COND_S && Comparand == 0 && Addend == 1)
CC = X86::COND_LE;
else if (CC == X86::COND_NS && Addend == 1)
else if (CC == X86::COND_NS && Comparand == 0 && Addend == 1)
CC = X86::COND_G;
else if (CC == X86::COND_G && Addend == -1)
else if (CC == X86::COND_G && Comparand == 0 && Addend == -1)
CC = X86::COND_GE;
else if (CC == X86::COND_LE && Addend == -1)
else if (CC == X86::COND_LE && Comparand == 0 && Addend == -1)
CC = X86::COND_L;
else
return SDValue();

View File

@ -176,4 +176,45 @@ entry:
ret i8 %tmp2
}
define i8 @test_sub_1_setcc_eq(i64* %p) #0 {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_sub_1_setcc_eq:
; CHECK: # BB#0: # %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: lock decq (%rdi)
; CHECK-NEXT: sete %al
; CHECK-NEXT: retq
entry:
%tmp0 = atomicrmw sub i64* %p, i64 1 seq_cst
%tmp1 = icmp eq i64 %tmp0, 1
%tmp2 = zext i1 %tmp1 to i8
ret i8 %tmp2
}
define i8 @test_add_5_setcc_ne(i64* %p) #0 {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_add_5_setcc_ne:
; CHECK: # BB#0: # %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: lock addq $5, (%rdi)
; CHECK-NEXT: setne %al
; CHECK-NEXT: retq
entry:
%tmp0 = atomicrmw add i64* %p, i64 5 seq_cst
%tmp1 = icmp ne i64 %tmp0, -5
%tmp2 = zext i1 %tmp1 to i8
ret i8 %tmp2
}
define i8 @test_add_5_setcc_ne_comparand_mismatch(i64* %p) #0 {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_add_5_setcc_ne_comparand_mismatch:
; CHECK: # BB#0: # %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: movl $5, %eax
; CHECK-NEXT: lock xaddq %rax, (%rdi)
; CHECK-NEXT: testq %rax, %rax
; CHECK-NEXT: setne %al
; CHECK-NEXT: retq
entry:
%tmp0 = atomicrmw add i64* %p, i64 5 seq_cst
%tmp1 = icmp ne i64 %tmp0, 0
%tmp2 = zext i1 %tmp1 to i8
ret i8 %tmp2
}
attributes #0 = { nounwind }