mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-10-19 11:02:59 +02:00
[StrictFP] Make getStrictFPOpcodeAction(...) more accessible
NFCI. This function will be reused in upcoming patches. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47380 llvm-svn: 333433
This commit is contained in:
parent
718ff9bbbf
commit
51ec5fcdb3
@ -767,6 +767,35 @@ public:
|
||||
return OpActions[(unsigned)VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy][Op];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LegalizeAction getStrictFPOperationAction(unsigned Op, EVT VT) const {
|
||||
unsigned EqOpc;
|
||||
switch (Op) {
|
||||
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected FP pseudo-opcode");
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FSQRT: EqOpc = ISD::FSQRT; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FPOW: EqOpc = ISD::FPOW; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FPOWI: EqOpc = ISD::FPOWI; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FMA: EqOpc = ISD::FMA; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FSIN: EqOpc = ISD::FSIN; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FCOS: EqOpc = ISD::FCOS; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FEXP: EqOpc = ISD::FEXP; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FEXP2: EqOpc = ISD::FEXP2; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FLOG: EqOpc = ISD::FLOG; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FLOG10: EqOpc = ISD::FLOG10; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FLOG2: EqOpc = ISD::FLOG2; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FRINT: EqOpc = ISD::FRINT; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FNEARBYINT: EqOpc = ISD::FNEARBYINT; break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto Action = getOperationAction(EqOpc, VT);
|
||||
|
||||
// We don't currently handle Custom or Promote for strict FP pseudo-ops.
|
||||
// For now, we just expand for those cases.
|
||||
if (Action != Legal)
|
||||
Action = Expand;
|
||||
|
||||
return Action;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Return true if the specified operation is legal on this target or can be
|
||||
/// made legal with custom lowering. This is used to help guide high-level
|
||||
/// lowering decisions.
|
||||
|
@ -946,36 +946,6 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeLoadOps(SDNode *Node) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static TargetLowering::LegalizeAction
|
||||
getStrictFPOpcodeAction(const TargetLowering &TLI, unsigned Opcode, EVT VT) {
|
||||
unsigned EqOpc;
|
||||
switch (Opcode) {
|
||||
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected FP pseudo-opcode");
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FSQRT: EqOpc = ISD::FSQRT; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FPOW: EqOpc = ISD::FPOW; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FPOWI: EqOpc = ISD::FPOWI; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FMA: EqOpc = ISD::FMA; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FSIN: EqOpc = ISD::FSIN; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FCOS: EqOpc = ISD::FCOS; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FEXP: EqOpc = ISD::FEXP; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FEXP2: EqOpc = ISD::FEXP2; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FLOG: EqOpc = ISD::FLOG; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FLOG10: EqOpc = ISD::FLOG10; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FLOG2: EqOpc = ISD::FLOG2; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FRINT: EqOpc = ISD::FRINT; break;
|
||||
case ISD::STRICT_FNEARBYINT: EqOpc = ISD::FNEARBYINT; break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto Action = TLI.getOperationAction(EqOpc, VT);
|
||||
|
||||
// We don't currently handle Custom or Promote for strict FP pseudo-ops.
|
||||
// For now, we just expand for those cases.
|
||||
if (Action != TargetLowering::Legal)
|
||||
Action = TargetLowering::Expand;
|
||||
|
||||
return Action;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Return a legal replacement for the given operation, with all legal operands.
|
||||
void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDNode *Node) {
|
||||
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nLegalizing: "; Node->dump(&DAG));
|
||||
@ -1138,8 +1108,8 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDNode *Node) {
|
||||
// equivalent. For instance, if ISD::FSQRT is legal then ISD::STRICT_FSQRT
|
||||
// is also legal, but if ISD::FSQRT requires expansion then so does
|
||||
// ISD::STRICT_FSQRT.
|
||||
Action = getStrictFPOpcodeAction(TLI, Node->getOpcode(),
|
||||
Node->getValueType(0));
|
||||
Action = TLI.getStrictFPOperationAction(Node->getOpcode(),
|
||||
Node->getValueType(0));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
if (Node->getOpcode() >= ISD::BUILTIN_OP_END) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user