mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-24 11:42:57 +01:00
[DAGCombine] Limit the number of times for the same store and root nodes
to bail out in store merging dependence check. We run into a case where dependence check in store merging bail out many times for the same store and root nodes in a huge basicblock. That increases compile time by almost 100x. The patch add a map to track how many times the bailing out happen for the same store and root, and if it is over a limit, stop considering the store with the same root as a merging candidate. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65174 llvm-svn: 367472
This commit is contained in:
parent
5334f6b691
commit
58201367d2
@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> TokenFactorInlineLimit(
|
||||
"combiner-tokenfactor-inline-limit", cl::Hidden, cl::init(2048),
|
||||
cl::desc("Limit the number of operands to inline for Token Factors"));
|
||||
|
||||
static cl::opt<unsigned> StoreMergeDependenceLimit(
|
||||
"combiner-store-merge-dependence-limit", cl::Hidden, cl::init(10),
|
||||
cl::desc("Limit the number of times for the same StoreNode and RootNode "
|
||||
"to bail out in store merging dependence check"));
|
||||
|
||||
namespace {
|
||||
|
||||
class DAGCombiner {
|
||||
@ -157,6 +162,14 @@ namespace {
|
||||
/// which have not yet been combined to the worklist.
|
||||
SmallPtrSet<SDNode *, 32> CombinedNodes;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Map from candidate StoreNode to the pair of RootNode and count.
|
||||
/// The count is used to track how many times we have seen the StoreNode
|
||||
/// with the same RootNode bail out in dependence check. If we have seen
|
||||
/// the bail out for the same pair many times over a limit, we won't
|
||||
/// consider the StoreNode with the same RootNode as store merging
|
||||
/// candidate again.
|
||||
DenseMap<SDNode *, std::pair<SDNode *, unsigned>> StoreRootCountMap;
|
||||
|
||||
// AA - Used for DAG load/store alias analysis.
|
||||
AliasAnalysis *AA;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -241,6 +254,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||
void removeFromWorklist(SDNode *N) {
|
||||
CombinedNodes.erase(N);
|
||||
PruningList.remove(N);
|
||||
StoreRootCountMap.erase(N);
|
||||
|
||||
auto It = WorklistMap.find(N);
|
||||
if (It == WorklistMap.end())
|
||||
@ -15423,6 +15437,18 @@ void DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeCandidates(
|
||||
return (BasePtr.equalBaseIndex(Ptr, DAG, Offset));
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if the pair of StoreNode and the RootNode already bail out many
|
||||
// times which is over the limit in dependence check.
|
||||
auto OverLimitInDependenceCheck = [&](SDNode *StoreNode,
|
||||
SDNode *RootNode) -> bool {
|
||||
auto RootCount = StoreRootCountMap.find(StoreNode);
|
||||
if (RootCount != StoreRootCountMap.end() &&
|
||||
RootCount->second.first == RootNode &&
|
||||
RootCount->second.second > StoreMergeDependenceLimit)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// We looking for a root node which is an ancestor to all mergable
|
||||
// stores. We search up through a load, to our root and then down
|
||||
// through all children. For instance we will find Store{1,2,3} if
|
||||
@ -15452,7 +15478,8 @@ void DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeCandidates(
|
||||
if (StoreSDNode *OtherST = dyn_cast<StoreSDNode>(*I2)) {
|
||||
BaseIndexOffset Ptr;
|
||||
int64_t PtrDiff;
|
||||
if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff))
|
||||
if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff) &&
|
||||
!OverLimitInDependenceCheck(OtherST, RootNode))
|
||||
StoreNodes.push_back(MemOpLink(OtherST, PtrDiff));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
@ -15462,7 +15489,8 @@ void DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeCandidates(
|
||||
if (StoreSDNode *OtherST = dyn_cast<StoreSDNode>(*I)) {
|
||||
BaseIndexOffset Ptr;
|
||||
int64_t PtrDiff;
|
||||
if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff))
|
||||
if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff) &&
|
||||
!OverLimitInDependenceCheck(OtherST, RootNode))
|
||||
StoreNodes.push_back(MemOpLink(OtherST, PtrDiff));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -15520,8 +15548,19 @@ bool DAGCombiner::checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies(
|
||||
// Search through DAG. We can stop early if we find a store node.
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumStores; ++i)
|
||||
if (SDNode::hasPredecessorHelper(StoreNodes[i].MemNode, Visited, Worklist,
|
||||
Max))
|
||||
Max)) {
|
||||
// If the searching bail out, record the StoreNode and RootNode in the
|
||||
// StoreRootCountMap. If we have seen the pair many times over a limit,
|
||||
// we won't add the StoreNode into StoreNodes set again.
|
||||
if (Visited.size() >= Max) {
|
||||
auto &RootCount = StoreRootCountMap[StoreNodes[i].MemNode];
|
||||
if (RootCount.first == RootNode)
|
||||
RootCount.second++;
|
||||
else
|
||||
RootCount = {RootNode, 1};
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user