From 78b714b721626bb87b324963d2d3295207fd0d81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Justin Bogner Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 06:29:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] docs: Improve wording on building for fuzzing The original sentence didn't really make sense. Patch by Vedant Kumar. Thanks! llvm-svn: 315676 --- docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst b/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst index 138c655a962..5ac0ff8d519 100644 --- a/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst +++ b/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst @@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ Configuring LLVM to Build Fuzzers Fuzzers will be built and linked to libFuzzer by default as long as you build LLVM with sanitizer coverage enabled. You would typically also enable at least -one sanitizer for the fuzzers to be particularly likely, so the most common way -to build the fuzzers is by adding the following two flags to your CMake -invocation: ``-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE=On``. +one sanitizer to find bugs faster. The most common way to build the fuzzers is +by adding the following two flags to your CMake invocation: +``-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE=On``. .. note:: If you have ``compiler-rt`` checked out in an LLVM tree when building with sanitizers, you'll want to specify ``-DLLVM_BUILD_RUNTIME=Off``