mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-24 03:33:20 +01:00
[ValueTracking] Make isImpliedCondition return an Optional<bool>. NFC.
Phabricator Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19277 llvm-svn: 266904
This commit is contained in:
parent
09a60e141a
commit
7b61268a0d
@ -446,8 +446,9 @@ template <typename T> class ArrayRef;
|
||||
/// E.g. if RangeMD is !{i32 0, i32 10, i32 15, i32 20} then return [0, 20).
|
||||
ConstantRange getConstantRangeFromMetadata(MDNode &RangeMD);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Return true if RHS is known to be implied by LHS. The implication may be
|
||||
/// either true or false depending on what is returned in ImpliedTrue.
|
||||
/// Return true if RHS is known to be implied true by LHS. Return false if
|
||||
/// RHS is known to be implied false by LHS. Otherwise, return None if no
|
||||
/// implication can be made.
|
||||
/// A & B must be i1 (boolean) values or a vector of such values. Note that
|
||||
/// the truth table for implication is the same as <=u on i1 values (but not
|
||||
/// <=s!). The truth table for both is:
|
||||
@ -455,11 +456,11 @@ template <typename T> class ArrayRef;
|
||||
/// T | T | F
|
||||
/// F | T | T
|
||||
/// (A)
|
||||
bool isImpliedCondition(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, bool &ImpliedTrue,
|
||||
const DataLayout &DL, unsigned Depth = 0,
|
||||
AssumptionCache *AC = nullptr,
|
||||
const Instruction *CxtI = nullptr,
|
||||
const DominatorTree *DT = nullptr);
|
||||
Optional<bool> isImpliedCondition(Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
||||
const DataLayout &DL, unsigned Depth = 0,
|
||||
AssumptionCache *AC = nullptr,
|
||||
const Instruction *CxtI = nullptr,
|
||||
const DominatorTree *DT = nullptr);
|
||||
} // end namespace llvm
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -2135,8 +2135,7 @@ static Value *SimplifyICmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
||||
// X >=u 1 -> X
|
||||
if (match(RHS, m_One()))
|
||||
return LHS;
|
||||
bool ImpliedTrue;
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondition(RHS, LHS, ImpliedTrue, Q.DL) && ImpliedTrue)
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondition(RHS, LHS, Q.DL).getValueOr(false))
|
||||
return getTrue(ITy);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2148,8 +2147,7 @@ static Value *SimplifyICmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
||||
/// 0 | 1 | 1 (0 >= -1) | 1
|
||||
/// 1 | 0 | 0 (-1 >= 0) | 0
|
||||
/// 1 | 1 | 1 (-1 >= -1) | 1
|
||||
bool ImpliedTrue;
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondition(LHS, RHS, ImpliedTrue, Q.DL) && ImpliedTrue)
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondition(LHS, RHS, Q.DL).getValueOr(false))
|
||||
return getTrue(ITy);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2164,8 +2162,7 @@ static Value *SimplifyICmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
||||
return LHS;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE: {
|
||||
bool ImpliedTrue;
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondition(LHS, RHS, ImpliedTrue, Q.DL) && ImpliedTrue)
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondition(LHS, RHS, Q.DL).getValueOr(false))
|
||||
return getTrue(ITy);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3909,44 +3909,46 @@ static bool isTruePredicate(CmpInst::Predicate Pred, Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Return true if "icmp Pred BLHS BRHS" is true whenever "icmp Pred
|
||||
/// ALHS ARHS" is true.
|
||||
static bool isImpliedCondOperands(CmpInst::Predicate Pred, Value *ALHS,
|
||||
Value *ARHS, Value *BLHS, Value *BRHS,
|
||||
const DataLayout &DL, unsigned Depth,
|
||||
AssumptionCache *AC, const Instruction *CxtI,
|
||||
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
||||
/// ALHS ARHS" is true. Otherwise, return None.
|
||||
static Optional<bool>
|
||||
isImpliedCondOperands(CmpInst::Predicate Pred, Value *ALHS, Value *ARHS,
|
||||
Value *BLHS, Value *BRHS, const DataLayout &DL,
|
||||
unsigned Depth, AssumptionCache *AC,
|
||||
const Instruction *CxtI, const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
||||
switch (Pred) {
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
||||
return isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_SLE, BLHS, ALHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI,
|
||||
DT) &&
|
||||
isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_SLE, ARHS, BRHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI,
|
||||
DT);
|
||||
if (isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_SLE, BLHS, ALHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI,
|
||||
DT) &&
|
||||
isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_SLE, ARHS, BRHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI, DT))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
|
||||
return isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_ULE, BLHS, ALHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI,
|
||||
DT) &&
|
||||
isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_ULE, ARHS, BRHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI,
|
||||
DT);
|
||||
if (isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_ULE, BLHS, ALHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI,
|
||||
DT) &&
|
||||
isTruePredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_ULE, ARHS, BRHS, DL, Depth, AC, CxtI, DT))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Return true if "icmp2 BPred BLHS BRHS" is known to be implied by "icmp1
|
||||
/// APred ALHS ARHS". The implication may be either true or false depending on
|
||||
/// the return value of ImpliedTrue.
|
||||
static bool isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(CmpInst::Predicate APred, Value *ALHS,
|
||||
Value *ARHS, CmpInst::Predicate BPred,
|
||||
Value *BLHS, Value *BRHS,
|
||||
bool &ImpliedTrue) {
|
||||
/// Return true if "icmp1 APred ALHS ARHS" implies "icmp2 BPred BLHS BRHS" is
|
||||
/// true. Return false if "icmp1 APred ALHS ARHS" implies "icmp2 BPred BLHS
|
||||
/// BRHS" is false. Otherwise, return None if we can't infer anything.
|
||||
static Optional<bool> isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(CmpInst::Predicate APred,
|
||||
Value *ALHS, Value *ARHS,
|
||||
CmpInst::Predicate BPred,
|
||||
Value *BLHS, Value *BRHS) {
|
||||
// The operands of the two compares must match.
|
||||
bool IsMatchingOps = (ALHS == BLHS && ARHS == BRHS);
|
||||
bool IsSwappedOps = (ALHS == BRHS && ARHS == BLHS);
|
||||
if (!IsMatchingOps && !IsSwappedOps)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
|
||||
// Canonicalize the operands so they're matching.
|
||||
if (IsSwappedOps) {
|
||||
@ -3956,17 +3958,13 @@ static bool isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(CmpInst::Predicate APred, Value *ALHS,
|
||||
|
||||
// If the predicates match, then we know the first condition implies the
|
||||
// second is true.
|
||||
if (APred == BPred) {
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = true;
|
||||
if (APred == BPred)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If an inverted APred matches BPred, we can infer the second condition is
|
||||
// false.
|
||||
if (CmpInst::getInversePredicate(APred) == BPred) {
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = false;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (CmpInst::getInversePredicate(APred) == BPred)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// If a swapped APred matches BPred, we can infer the second condition is
|
||||
// false in many cases.
|
||||
@ -3978,8 +3976,7 @@ static bool isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(CmpInst::Predicate APred, Value *ALHS,
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_ULT: // A <u B implies A >u B is false.
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_SGT: // A >s B implies A <s B is false.
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_SLT: // A <s B implies A >s B is false.
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = false;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3987,17 +3984,16 @@ static bool isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(CmpInst::Predicate APred, Value *ALHS,
|
||||
// comparison (which is signless).
|
||||
if (ICmpInst::isSigned(APred) != ICmpInst::isSigned(BPred) &&
|
||||
!ICmpInst::isEquality(APred) && !ICmpInst::isEquality(BPred))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (APred) {
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
|
||||
// A == B implies A > B and A < B are false.
|
||||
if (CmpInst::isFalseWhenEqual(BPred)) {
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = false;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (CmpInst::isFalseWhenEqual(BPred))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
||||
@ -4005,38 +4001,34 @@ static bool isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(CmpInst::Predicate APred, Value *ALHS,
|
||||
case CmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
||||
// A > B implies A == B is false.
|
||||
// A < B implies A == B is false.
|
||||
if (BPred == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ) {
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = false;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (BPred == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// A > B implies A != B is true.
|
||||
// A < B implies A != B is true.
|
||||
if (BPred == CmpInst::ICMP_NE) {
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = true;
|
||||
if (BPred == CmpInst::ICMP_NE)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool llvm::isImpliedCondition(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, bool &ImpliedTrue,
|
||||
const DataLayout &DL, unsigned Depth,
|
||||
AssumptionCache *AC, const Instruction *CxtI,
|
||||
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
||||
Optional<bool> llvm::isImpliedCondition(Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
|
||||
const DataLayout &DL, unsigned Depth,
|
||||
AssumptionCache *AC,
|
||||
const Instruction *CxtI,
|
||||
const DominatorTree *DT) {
|
||||
assert(LHS->getType() == RHS->getType() && "mismatched type");
|
||||
Type *OpTy = LHS->getType();
|
||||
assert(OpTy->getScalarType()->isIntegerTy(1));
|
||||
|
||||
// LHS ==> RHS by definition
|
||||
if (LHS == RHS) {
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = true;
|
||||
if (LHS == RHS)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (OpTy->isVectorTy())
|
||||
// TODO: extending the code below to handle vectors
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
assert(OpTy->isIntegerTy(1) && "implied by above");
|
||||
|
||||
ICmpInst::Predicate APred, BPred;
|
||||
@ -4045,17 +4037,16 @@ bool llvm::isImpliedCondition(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, bool &ImpliedTrue,
|
||||
|
||||
if (!match(LHS, m_ICmp(APred, m_Value(ALHS), m_Value(ARHS))) ||
|
||||
!match(RHS, m_ICmp(BPred, m_Value(BLHS), m_Value(BRHS))))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(APred, ALHS, ARHS, BPred, BLHS, BRHS,
|
||||
ImpliedTrue))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
Optional<bool> Implication =
|
||||
isImpliedCondMatchingOperands(APred, ALHS, ARHS, BPred, BLHS, BRHS);
|
||||
if (Implication)
|
||||
return Implication;
|
||||
|
||||
if (APred == BPred) {
|
||||
ImpliedTrue = true;
|
||||
if (APred == BPred)
|
||||
return isImpliedCondOperands(APred, ALHS, ARHS, BLHS, BRHS, DL, Depth, AC,
|
||||
CxtI, DT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -928,10 +928,11 @@ bool JumpThreading::ProcessImpliedCondition(BasicBlock *BB) {
|
||||
if (!PBI || !PBI->isConditional() || PBI->getSuccessor(0) != CurrentBB)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
bool ImpliedTrue;
|
||||
if (isImpliedCondition(PBI->getCondition(), Cond, ImpliedTrue, DL)) {
|
||||
BI->getSuccessor(ImpliedTrue ? 1 : 0)->removePredecessor(BB);
|
||||
BranchInst::Create(BI->getSuccessor(ImpliedTrue ? 0 : 1), BI);
|
||||
Optional<bool> Implication =
|
||||
isImpliedCondition(PBI->getCondition(), Cond, DL);
|
||||
if (Implication) {
|
||||
BI->getSuccessor(*Implication ? 1 : 0)->removePredecessor(BB);
|
||||
BranchInst::Create(BI->getSuccessor(*Implication ? 0 : 1), BI);
|
||||
BI->eraseFromParent();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2722,19 +2722,20 @@ static bool SimplifyCondBranchToCondBranch(BranchInst *PBI, BranchInst *BI,
|
||||
|
||||
// If BI is reached from the true path of PBI and PBI's condition implies
|
||||
// BI's condition, we know the direction of the BI branch.
|
||||
bool ImpliedTrue;
|
||||
if (PBI->getSuccessor(0) == BI->getParent() &&
|
||||
isImpliedCondition(PBI->getCondition(), BI->getCondition(), ImpliedTrue,
|
||||
DL) &&
|
||||
PBI->getSuccessor(0) != PBI->getSuccessor(1) &&
|
||||
BB->getSinglePredecessor()) {
|
||||
// Turn this into a branch on constant.
|
||||
auto *OldCond = BI->getCondition();
|
||||
ConstantInt *CI = ImpliedTrue ? ConstantInt::getTrue(BB->getContext())
|
||||
: ConstantInt::getFalse(BB->getContext());
|
||||
BI->setCondition(CI);
|
||||
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(OldCond);
|
||||
return true; // Nuke the branch on constant.
|
||||
Optional<bool> Implication =
|
||||
isImpliedCondition(PBI->getCondition(), BI->getCondition(), DL);
|
||||
if (Implication) {
|
||||
// Turn this into a branch on constant.
|
||||
auto *OldCond = BI->getCondition();
|
||||
ConstantInt *CI = *Implication ? ConstantInt::getTrue(BB->getContext())
|
||||
: ConstantInt::getFalse(BB->getContext());
|
||||
BI->setCondition(CI);
|
||||
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(OldCond);
|
||||
return true; // Nuke the branch on constant.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If both branches are conditional and both contain stores to the same
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user