Add hasProfileSummary and has{Sample|Instrumentation}Profile methods

ProfileSummaryInfo already checks whether the module has sample profile
in determining profile counts. This will also be useful in inliner to
clean up threshold updates.

llvm-svn: 303204

include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileSummaryInfo.h

@@ -55,6 +55,21 @@ public:
   ProfileSummaryInfo(ProfileSummaryInfo &&Arg)
       : M(Arg.M), Summary(std::move(Arg.Summary)) {}
 
+  /// \brief Returns true if profile summary is available.
+  bool hasProfileSummary() { return computeSummary(); }
+
+  /// \brief Returns true if module \c M has sample profile.
+  bool hasSampleProfile() {
+    return hasProfileSummary() &&
+           Summary->getKind() == ProfileSummary::PSK_Sample;
+  }
+
+  /// \brief Returns true if module \c M has instrumentation profile.
+  bool hasInstrumentationProfile() {
+    return hasProfileSummary() &&
+           Summary->getKind() == ProfileSummary::PSK_Instr;
+  }
+
   /// Handle the invalidation of this information.
   ///
   /// When used as a result of \c ProfileSummaryAnalysis this method will be

lib/Analysis/ProfileSummaryInfo.cpp

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ ProfileSummaryInfo::getProfileCount(const Instruction *Inst,
     return None;
   assert((isa<CallInst>(Inst) || isa<InvokeInst>(Inst)) &&
          "We can only get profile count for call/invoke instruction.");
-  if (computeSummary() && Summary->getKind() == ProfileSummary::PSK_Sample) {
+  if (hasSampleProfile()) {
     // In sample PGO mode, check if there is a profile metadata on the
     // instruction. If it is present, determine hotness solely based on that,
     // since the sampled entry count may not be accurate.

unittests/Analysis/ProfileSummaryInfoTest.cpp

@@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ TEST_F(ProfileSummaryInfoTest, TestNoProfile) {
   Function *F = M->getFunction("f");
 
   ProfileSummaryInfo PSI = buildPSI(M.get());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(PSI.hasProfileSummary());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(PSI.hasSampleProfile());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(PSI.hasInstrumentationProfile());
   // In the absence of profiles, is{Hot|Cold}X methods should always return
   // false.
   EXPECT_FALSE(PSI.isHotCount(1000));
@@ -130,6 +133,7 @@ TEST_F(ProfileSummaryInfoTest, TestCommon) {
   Function *H = M->getFunction("h");
 
   ProfileSummaryInfo PSI = buildPSI(M.get());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(PSI.hasProfileSummary());
   EXPECT_TRUE(PSI.isHotCount(400));
   EXPECT_TRUE(PSI.isColdCount(2));
   EXPECT_FALSE(PSI.isColdCount(100));
@@ -144,6 +148,8 @@ TEST_F(ProfileSummaryInfoTest, InstrProf) {
   auto M = makeLLVMModule("InstrProf");
   Function *F = M->getFunction("f");
   ProfileSummaryInfo PSI = buildPSI(M.get());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(PSI.hasProfileSummary());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(PSI.hasInstrumentationProfile());
 
   BasicBlock &BB0 = F->getEntryBlock();
   BasicBlock *BB1 = BB0.getTerminator()->getSuccessor(0);
@@ -174,6 +180,8 @@ TEST_F(ProfileSummaryInfoTest, SampleProf) {
   auto M = makeLLVMModule("SampleProfile");
   Function *F = M->getFunction("f");
   ProfileSummaryInfo PSI = buildPSI(M.get());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(PSI.hasProfileSummary());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(PSI.hasSampleProfile());
 
   BasicBlock &BB0 = F->getEntryBlock();
   BasicBlock *BB1 = BB0.getTerminator()->getSuccessor(0);