mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-23 03:02:36 +01:00
Revert "Return "[SCEV] Use isBasicBlockEntryGuardedByCond in isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond", 2nd try"
This reverts commit f690986f314fbf3f4b3ca9ec0b87b95166008dc1. Compile time then and again...
This commit is contained in:
parent
f692ada5cd
commit
95e0a99bdd
@ -9851,6 +9851,10 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
|
||||
assert(!verifyFunction(*L->getHeader()->getParent(), &dbgs()) &&
|
||||
"This cannot be done on broken IR!");
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *Latch = L->getLoopLatch();
|
||||
if (!Latch)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@ -9866,7 +9870,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
|
||||
// We don't want more than one activation of the following loops on the stack
|
||||
// -- that can lead to O(n!) time complexity.
|
||||
if (WalkingBEDominatingConds)
|
||||
return isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning(Pred, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
SaveAndRestore<bool> ClearOnExit(WalkingBEDominatingConds, true);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -9907,7 +9911,42 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
|
||||
if (isImpliedViaGuard(Latch, Pred, LHS, RHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
return isBasicBlockEntryGuardedByCond(Latch, Pred, LHS, RHS);
|
||||
for (DomTreeNode *DTN = DT[Latch], *HeaderDTN = DT[L->getHeader()];
|
||||
DTN != HeaderDTN; DTN = DTN->getIDom()) {
|
||||
assert(DTN && "should reach the loop header before reaching the root!");
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = DTN->getBlock();
|
||||
if (isImpliedViaGuard(BB, Pred, LHS, RHS))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *PBB = BB->getSinglePredecessor();
|
||||
if (!PBB)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
BranchInst *ContinuePredicate = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(PBB->getTerminator());
|
||||
if (!ContinuePredicate || !ContinuePredicate->isConditional())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
Value *Condition = ContinuePredicate->getCondition();
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have an edge `E` within the loop body that dominates the only
|
||||
// latch, the condition guarding `E` also guards the backedge. This
|
||||
// reasoning works only for loops with a single latch.
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlockEdge DominatingEdge(PBB, BB);
|
||||
if (DominatingEdge.isSingleEdge()) {
|
||||
// We're constructively (and conservatively) enumerating edges within the
|
||||
// loop body that dominate the latch. The dominator tree better agree
|
||||
// with us on this:
|
||||
assert(DT.dominates(DominatingEdge, Latch) && "should be!");
|
||||
|
||||
if (isImpliedCond(Pred, LHS, RHS, Condition,
|
||||
BB != ContinuePredicate->getSuccessor(0)))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ScalarEvolution::isBasicBlockEntryGuardedByCond(const BasicBlock *BB,
|
||||
|
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ define void @_Z15IntegerToStringjjR7Vector2(i32 %i, i32 %radix, %struct.Vector2*
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UGLYGEP2:%.*]] = bitcast i8* [[UGLYGEP]] to i16*
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP29:%.*]] = load i16, i16* [[LSR_IV810]], align 2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 [[TMP29]], i16* [[UGLYGEP2]], align 2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LSR_IV_NEXT]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[LSR_IV]], 2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LSR_IV_NEXT]] = add i64 [[LSR_IV]], 2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LSR_IV_NEXT3:%.*]] = inttoptr i64 [[LSR_IV_NEXT]] to i16*
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SCEVGEP9:%.*]] = getelementptr [33 x i16], [33 x i16]* [[LSR_IV8]], i64 0, i64 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3]] = bitcast i16* [[SCEVGEP9]] to [33 x i16]*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user