From a21f060918db45e33c8f94531492742e9da688f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Lewycky Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:52:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix crash in VerifyType when checking Contexts. Because there may not be a Module (we were called with verifyFunction and an unowned Function) we can't rely on Mod->getContext(). llvm-svn: 96275 --- lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp index b3ac2146334..be86614e12b 100644 --- a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp +++ b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ namespace { VerifierFailureAction action; // What to do if verification fails. Module *Mod; // Module we are verifying right now - DominatorTree *DT; // Dominator Tree, caution can be null! + LLVMContext *Context; // Context within which we are verifying + DominatorTree *DT; // Dominator Tree, caution can be null! std::string Messages; raw_string_ostream MessagesStr; @@ -178,24 +179,25 @@ namespace { Verifier() : FunctionPass(&ID), Broken(false), RealPass(true), action(AbortProcessAction), - DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} + Mod(0), Context(0), DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} explicit Verifier(VerifierFailureAction ctn) : FunctionPass(&ID), - Broken(false), RealPass(true), action(ctn), DT(0), + Broken(false), RealPass(true), action(ctn), Mod(0), Context(0), DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} explicit Verifier(bool AB) : FunctionPass(&ID), Broken(false), RealPass(true), - action( AB ? AbortProcessAction : PrintMessageAction), DT(0), - MessagesStr(Messages) {} + action( AB ? AbortProcessAction : PrintMessageAction), Mod(0), + Context(0), DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} explicit Verifier(DominatorTree &dt) : FunctionPass(&ID), - Broken(false), RealPass(false), action(PrintMessageAction), - DT(&dt), MessagesStr(Messages) {} + Broken(false), RealPass(false), action(PrintMessageAction), Mod(0), + Context(0), DT(&dt), MessagesStr(Messages) {} bool doInitialization(Module &M) { Mod = &M; + Context = &M.getContext(); verifyTypeSymbolTable(M.getTypeSymbolTable()); // If this is a real pass, in a pass manager, we must abort before @@ -211,6 +213,7 @@ namespace { if (RealPass) DT = &getAnalysis(); Mod = F.getParent(); + if (!Context) Context = &F.getContext(); visit(F); InstsInThisBlock.clear(); @@ -596,6 +599,9 @@ void Verifier::visitFunction(Function &F) { const FunctionType *FT = F.getFunctionType(); unsigned NumArgs = F.arg_size(); + Assert1(Context == &F.getContext(), + "Function context does not match Module context!", &F); + Assert1(!F.hasCommonLinkage(), "Functions may not have common linkage", &F); Assert2(FT->getNumParams() == NumArgs, "# formal arguments must match # of arguments for function type!", @@ -1482,7 +1488,7 @@ void Verifier::visitInstruction(Instruction &I) { void Verifier::VerifyType(const Type *Ty) { if (!Types.insert(Ty)) return; - Assert1(&Mod->getContext() == &Ty->getContext(), + Assert1(Context == &Ty->getContext(), "Type context does not match Module context!", Ty); switch (Ty->getTypeID()) {