mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-23 19:23:23 +01:00
[ARM] Refactor converting Thumb1 from 3 to 2 operand (nfc)
Also adds some test cases. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11054 llvm-svn: 241799
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b927c9cd5
commit
a3566efdd9
@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ class ARMAsmParser : public MCTargetAsmParser {
|
||||
bool &CanAcceptCarrySet,
|
||||
bool &CanAcceptPredicationCode);
|
||||
|
||||
void tryConvertingToTwoOperandForm(StringRef Mnemonic, bool CarrySetting,
|
||||
OperandVector &Operands);
|
||||
bool isThumb() const {
|
||||
// FIXME: Can tablegen auto-generate this?
|
||||
return STI.getFeatureBits()[ARM::ModeThumb];
|
||||
@ -5465,6 +5467,47 @@ void ARMAsmParser::getMnemonicAcceptInfo(StringRef Mnemonic, StringRef FullInst,
|
||||
CanAcceptPredicationCode = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// \brief Some Thumb1 instructions have two operand forms that are not
|
||||
// available as three operand, convert to two operand form if possible.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FIXME: We would really like to be able to tablegen'erate this.
|
||||
void ARMAsmParser::tryConvertingToTwoOperandForm(StringRef Mnemonic,
|
||||
bool CarrySetting,
|
||||
OperandVector &Operands) {
|
||||
if (Operands.size() != 6 || !isThumbOne())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op3 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[3]);
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op4 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[4]);
|
||||
if (!Op3.isReg() || !Op4.isReg())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op5 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[5]);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(Mnemonic == "add" || Mnemonic == "sub" || Mnemonic == "and" ||
|
||||
Mnemonic == "eor" || Mnemonic == "lsl" || Mnemonic == "lsr" ||
|
||||
Mnemonic == "asr" || Mnemonic == "adc" || Mnemonic == "sbc" ||
|
||||
Mnemonic == "ror" || Mnemonic == "orr" || Mnemonic == "bic"))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
// If first 2 operands of a 3 operand instruction are the same
|
||||
// then transform to 2 operand version of the same instruction
|
||||
// e.g. 'adds r0, r0, #1' transforms to 'adds r0, #1'
|
||||
bool Transform = Op3.getReg() == Op4.getReg();
|
||||
// If both registers are the same then remove one of them from
|
||||
// the operand list, with certain exceptions.
|
||||
if (Transform) {
|
||||
// Don't transform 'adds Rd, Rd, Rm' or 'sub{s} Rd, Rd, Rm' because the
|
||||
// 2 operand forms don't exist.
|
||||
if (((Mnemonic == "add" && CarrySetting) || Mnemonic == "sub") &&
|
||||
Op5.isReg())
|
||||
Transform = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (Transform)
|
||||
Operands.erase(Operands.begin() + 3);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ARMAsmParser::shouldOmitCCOutOperand(StringRef Mnemonic,
|
||||
OperandVector &Operands) {
|
||||
// FIXME: This is all horribly hacky. We really need a better way to deal
|
||||
@ -5838,6 +5881,8 @@ bool ARMAsmParser::ParseInstruction(ParseInstructionInfo &Info, StringRef Name,
|
||||
"VFP/Neon double precision register expected");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tryConvertingToTwoOperandForm(Mnemonic, CarrySetting, Operands);
|
||||
|
||||
// Some instructions, mostly Thumb, have forms for the same mnemonic that
|
||||
// do and don't have a cc_out optional-def operand. With some spot-checks
|
||||
// of the operand list, we can figure out which variant we're trying to
|
||||
@ -5901,48 +5946,6 @@ bool ARMAsmParser::ParseInstruction(ParseInstructionInfo &Info, StringRef Name,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If first 2 operands of a 3 operand instruction are the same
|
||||
// then transform to 2 operand version of the same instruction
|
||||
// e.g. 'adds r0, r0, #1' transforms to 'adds r0, #1'
|
||||
// FIXME: We would really like to be able to tablegen'erate this.
|
||||
if (isThumbOne() && Operands.size() == 6 &&
|
||||
(Mnemonic == "add" || Mnemonic == "sub" || Mnemonic == "and" ||
|
||||
Mnemonic == "eor" || Mnemonic == "lsl" || Mnemonic == "lsr" ||
|
||||
Mnemonic == "asr" || Mnemonic == "adc" || Mnemonic == "sbc" ||
|
||||
Mnemonic == "ror" || Mnemonic == "orr" || Mnemonic == "bic")) {
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op3 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[3]);
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op4 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[4]);
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op5 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[5]);
|
||||
|
||||
// If both registers are the same then remove one of them from
|
||||
// the operand list.
|
||||
if (Op3.isReg() && Op4.isReg() && Op3.getReg() == Op4.getReg()) {
|
||||
// If 3rd operand (variable Op5) is a register and the instruction is adds/sub
|
||||
// then do not transform as the backend already handles this instruction
|
||||
// correctly.
|
||||
if (!Op5.isReg() || !((Mnemonic == "add" && CarrySetting) || Mnemonic == "sub")) {
|
||||
Operands.erase(Operands.begin() + 3);
|
||||
if (Mnemonic == "add" && !CarrySetting) {
|
||||
// Special case for 'add' (not 'adds') instruction must
|
||||
// remove the CCOut operand as well.
|
||||
Operands.erase(Operands.begin() + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If instruction is 'add' and first two register operands
|
||||
// use SP register, then remove one of the SP registers from
|
||||
// the instruction.
|
||||
// FIXME: We would really like to be able to tablegen'erate this.
|
||||
if (isThumbOne() && Operands.size() == 5 && Mnemonic == "add" && !CarrySetting) {
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op2 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[2]);
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op3 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[3]);
|
||||
if (Op2.isReg() && Op3.isReg() && Op2.getReg() == ARM::SP && Op3.getReg() == ARM::SP) {
|
||||
Operands.erase(Operands.begin() + 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// GNU Assembler extension (compatibility)
|
||||
if ((Mnemonic == "ldrd" || Mnemonic == "strd")) {
|
||||
ARMOperand &Op2 = static_cast<ARMOperand &>(*Operands[2]);
|
||||
|
@ -12,6 +12,19 @@
|
||||
add sp, sp, r0
|
||||
@ CHECK: add sp, r0 @ encoding: [0x85,0x44]
|
||||
|
||||
add r4, sp, r4
|
||||
@ CHECK: add r4, sp, r4 @ encoding: [0x6c,0x44]
|
||||
|
||||
add r4, r4, sp
|
||||
@ CHECK: add r4, sp @ encoding: [0x6c,0x44]
|
||||
|
||||
add sp, sp, #32
|
||||
@ FIXME: ARMARM says 'add sp, sp, #32'
|
||||
@ CHECK: add sp, #32 @ encoding: [0x08,0xb0]
|
||||
|
||||
add r5, sp, #1016
|
||||
@ CHECK: add r5, sp, #1016 @ encoding: [0xfe,0xad]
|
||||
|
||||
add r0, r0, r1
|
||||
@ CHECK: add r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x08,0x44]
|
||||
|
||||
@ -21,6 +34,12 @@
|
||||
subs r0, r0, r0
|
||||
@ CHECK: subs r0, r0, r0 @ encoding: [0x00,0x1a]
|
||||
|
||||
subs r2, r2, #8
|
||||
@ CHECK: subs r2, #8 @ encoding: [0x08,0x3a]
|
||||
|
||||
sub sp, sp, #16
|
||||
@ CHECK: sub sp, #16 @ encoding: [0x84,0xb0]
|
||||
|
||||
ands r0, r0, r1
|
||||
@ CHECK: ands r0, r1 @ encoding: [0x08,0x40]
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user