mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-23 03:02:36 +01:00
Don't use getSetCCResultType for creating a vselect
The vselect mask isn't a setcc. This breaks in the case when the result of getSetCCResultType is larger than the vector operands e.g. %tmp = select i1 %cmp <2 x i8> %a, <2 x i8> %b when getSetCCResultType returns <2 x i32>, the assertion that the (MaskTy.getSizeInBits() == Op1.getValueType().getSizeInBits()) is hit. No test since I don't think I can hit this with any of the current targets. The R600/SI implementation would break, since it returns a vector of i1 for this, but it doesn't reach ExpandSELECT for other reasons. llvm-svn: 190376
This commit is contained in:
parent
eeee915ad0
commit
aaf9a88c18
@ -599,8 +599,7 @@ SDValue VectorLegalizer::ExpandSELECT(SDValue Op) {
|
||||
return DAG.UnrollVectorOp(Op.getNode());
|
||||
|
||||
// Generate a mask operand.
|
||||
EVT MaskTy = TLI.getSetCCResultType(*DAG.getContext(), VT);
|
||||
assert(MaskTy.isVector() && "Invalid CC type");
|
||||
EVT MaskTy = VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger();
|
||||
assert(MaskTy.getSizeInBits() == Op1.getValueType().getSizeInBits()
|
||||
&& "Invalid mask size");
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user