mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2025-01-31 12:41:49 +01:00
[SimpleLoopUnswitch] Invalidate the topmost loop with ExitBB as exiting.
SCEV caches the exiting blocks when computing exit counts. In SimpleLoopUnswitch, we split the exit block of the loop to unswitch. Currently we only invalidate the loop containing that exit block, but if that block is the exiting block for a parent loop, we have stale cache entries. We have to invalidate the top-most loop that contains the exit block as exiting block. We might also be able to skip invalidating the loop containing the exit block, if the exit block is not an exiting block of that loop. There are also 2 more places in SimpleLoopUnswitch, that use a similar problematic approach to get the loop to invalidate. If the patch makes sense, I will also update those places to a similar approach (they deal with multiple exit blocks, so we cannot directly re-use getTopMostExitingLoop). Fixes PR43972. Reviewers: skatkov, reames, asbirlea, chandlerc Reviewed By: asbirlea Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70786
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e20340b43
commit
ac686c0d2d
@ -331,6 +331,20 @@ static void hoistLoopToNewParent(Loop &L, BasicBlock &Preheader,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Return the top-most loop containing ExitBB and having ExitBB as exiting block
|
||||
// or the loop containing ExitBB, if there is no parent loop containing ExitBB
|
||||
// as exiting block.
|
||||
static Loop *getTopMostExitingLoop(BasicBlock *ExitBB, LoopInfo &LI) {
|
||||
Loop *TopMost = LI.getLoopFor(ExitBB);
|
||||
Loop *Current = TopMost;
|
||||
while (Current) {
|
||||
if (Current->isLoopExiting(ExitBB))
|
||||
TopMost = Current;
|
||||
Current = Current->getParentLoop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return TopMost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Unswitch a trivial branch if the condition is loop invariant.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This routine should only be called when loop code leading to the branch has
|
||||
@ -415,9 +429,10 @@ static bool unswitchTrivialBranch(Loop &L, BranchInst &BI, DominatorTree &DT,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have scalar evolutions, we need to invalidate them including this
|
||||
// loop and the loop containing the exit block.
|
||||
// loop, the loop containing the exit block and the topmost parent loop
|
||||
// exiting via LoopExitBB.
|
||||
if (SE) {
|
||||
if (Loop *ExitL = LI.getLoopFor(LoopExitBB))
|
||||
if (Loop *ExitL = getTopMostExitingLoop(LoopExitBB, LI))
|
||||
SE->forgetLoop(ExitL);
|
||||
else
|
||||
// Forget the entire nest as this exits the entire nest.
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
|
||||
|
||||
; We run -indvars before -simple-loop-unswitch to compute SCEV exit counts before
|
||||
; running -simple-loop-unswitch.
|
||||
; RUN: opt -indvars -simple-loop-unswitch -S %s -verify-scev | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; Test for PR43972.
|
||||
|
||||
; We have a 3 nested loops (l1 <- l2 <- l3). %for.cond.5 is the exit block of
|
||||
; l3 and the loop for it is l2. But it is also the exiting block of l1. That
|
||||
; means we have to invalidate l1 to preserve SCEV.
|
||||
|
||||
define void @f() {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @f(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LNOT:%.*]] = xor i1 undef, true
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond.loopexit:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond1:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[FOR_BODY]], label [[FOR_COND_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.body:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LNOT]], label [[FOR_BODY_SPLIT:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND5_SPLIT:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.body.split:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LAND_RHS:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond2:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[LAND_RHS]], label [[FOR_COND5:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: land.rhs:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND2:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond5:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND5_SPLIT]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond5.split:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[FOR_BODY7:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND1:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.body7:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
||||
;
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%lnot = xor i1 undef, true
|
||||
br label %for.cond
|
||||
|
||||
for.cond: ; preds = %for.cond1, %entry
|
||||
br label %for.body
|
||||
|
||||
for.cond1: ; preds = %for.cond5
|
||||
br i1 true, label %for.body, label %for.cond
|
||||
|
||||
for.body: ; preds = %for.cond1, %for.cond
|
||||
br label %land.rhs
|
||||
|
||||
for.cond2: ; preds = %land.rhs
|
||||
br i1 true, label %land.rhs, label %for.cond5
|
||||
|
||||
land.rhs: ; preds = %for.cond2, %for.body
|
||||
br i1 %lnot, label %for.cond2, label %for.cond5
|
||||
|
||||
for.cond5: ; preds = %land.rhs, %for.cond2
|
||||
br i1 true, label %for.body7, label %for.cond1
|
||||
|
||||
for.body7: ; preds = %for.cond5
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user