mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-24 11:42:57 +01:00
Switch the constant expression speculation cost evaluation away from
a cost fuction that seems both a bit ad-hoc and also poorly suited to evaluating constant expressions. Notably, it is missing any support for trivial expressions such as 'inttoptr'. I could fix this routine, but it isn't clear to me all of the constraints its other users are operating under. The core protection that seems relevant here is avoiding the formation of a select instruction wich a further chain of select operations in a constant expression operand. Just explicitly encode that constraint. Also, update the comments and organization here to make it clear where this needs to go -- this should be driven off of real cost measurements which take into account the number of constants expressions and the depth of the constant expression tree. llvm-svn: 173340
This commit is contained in:
parent
3a2e7d9dea
commit
bc67fc9f93
@ -1433,21 +1433,28 @@ static bool SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *ThenBB) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
HaveRewritablePHIs = true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for safety.
|
||||
ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(ThenV);
|
||||
if (!CE)
|
||||
continue; // Known safe.
|
||||
continue; // Known safe and cheap.
|
||||
|
||||
if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(CE))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Don't speculate into a select with a constant select expression operand.
|
||||
// FIXME: This should really be a cost metric, but our cost model doesn't
|
||||
// accurately model the expense of select.
|
||||
if (Operator::getOpcode(CE) == Instruction::Select)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// An unfolded ConstantExpr could end up getting expanded into
|
||||
// Instructions. Don't speculate this and another instruction at
|
||||
// the same time.
|
||||
// FIXME: This is strange because provided we haven't already hit the cost
|
||||
// of 1, this code will speculate an arbitrary number of complex constant
|
||||
// expression PHI nodes. Also, this doesn't account for how complex the
|
||||
// constant expression is.
|
||||
if (SpeculationCost > 0)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(CE))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (ComputeSpeculationCost(CE) > PHINodeFoldingThreshold)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If there are no PHIs to process, bail early. This helps ensure idempotence
|
||||
|
@ -44,3 +44,25 @@ join:
|
||||
ret i8 %c
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define i8* @test3(i1* %dummy, i8* %a, i8* %b) {
|
||||
; Test that a weird, unfolded constant cast in the PHI don't block speculation.
|
||||
; CHECK: @test3
|
||||
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cond1 = load volatile i1* %dummy
|
||||
br i1 %cond1, label %if, label %end
|
||||
|
||||
if:
|
||||
%cond2 = load volatile i1* %dummy
|
||||
br i1 %cond2, label %then, label %end
|
||||
|
||||
then:
|
||||
br label %end
|
||||
|
||||
end:
|
||||
%x = phi i8* [ %a, %entry ], [ %b, %if ], [ inttoptr (i64 42 to i8*), %then ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NOT: phi
|
||||
; CHECK: select i1 %cond2, i8* inttoptr
|
||||
|
||||
ret i8* %x
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user