Introduce llvm.experimental.widenable_condition intrinsic

This patch introduces a new instinsic `@llvm.experimental.widenable_condition`
that allows explicit representation for guards. It is an alternative to using
`@llvm.experimental.guard` intrinsic that does not contain implicit control flow.

We keep finding places where `@llvm.experimental.guard` is not supported or
treated too conservatively, and there are 2 reasons to that:

- `@llvm.experimental.guard` has memory write side effect to model implicit control flow,
  and this sometimes confuses passes and analyzes that work with memory;
- Not all passes and analysis are aware of the semantics of guards. These passes treat them
  as regular throwing call and have no idea that the condition of guard may be used to prove
  something. One well-known place which had caused us troubles in the past is explicit loop
  iteration count calculation in SCEV. Another example is new loop unswitching which is not
  aware of guards. Whenever a new pass appears, we potentially have this problem there.

Rather than go and fix all these places (and commit to keep track of them and add support
in future), it seems more reasonable to leverage the existing optimizer's logic as much as possible.
The only significant difference between guards and regular explicit branches is that guard's condition
can be widened. It means that a guard contains (explicitly or implicitly) a `deopt` block successor,
and it is always legal to go there no matter what the guard condition is. The other successor is
a guarded block, and it is only legal to go there if the condition is true.

This patch introduces a new explicit form of guards alternative to `@llvm.experimental.guard`
intrinsic. Now a widenable guard can be represented in the CFG explicitly like this:


    %widenable_condition = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
    %new_condition = and i1 %cond, %widenable_condition
    br i1 %new_condition, label %guarded, label %deopt

  guarded:
    ; Guarded instructions

  deopt:
    call type @llvm.experimental.deoptimize(<args...>) [ "deopt"(<deopt_args...>) ]

The new intrinsic `@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition` has semantics of an
`undef`, but the intrinsic prevents the optimizer from folding it early. This form
should exploit all optimization boons provided to `br` instuction, and it still can be
widened by replacing the result of `@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()`
with `and` with any arbitrary boolean value (as long as the branch that is taken when
it is `false` has a deopt and has no side-effects).

For more motivation, please check llvm-dev discussion "[llvm-dev] Giving up using
implicit control flow in guards".

This patch introduces this new intrinsic with respective LangRef changes and a pass
that converts old-style guards (expressed as intrinsics) into the new form.

The naming discussion is still ungoing. Merging this to unblock further items. We can
later change the name of this intrinsic.

Reviewed By: reames, fedor.sergeev, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51207

llvm-svn: 348593

docs/LangRef.rst

@@ -15604,6 +15604,145 @@ if"); and this allows for "check widening" type optimizations.
 ``@llvm.experimental.guard`` cannot be invoked.
 
 
+'``llvm.experimental.widenable.condition``' Intrinsic
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+Syntax:
+"""""""
+
+::
+
+      declare i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+
+Overview:
+"""""""""
+
+This intrinsic represents a "widenable condition" which is
+boolean expressions with the following property: whether this
+expression is `true` or `false`, the program is correct and
+well-defined.
+
+Together with :ref:`deoptimization operand bundles <deopt_opbundles>`,
+``@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition`` allows frontends to
+express guards or checks on optimistic assumptions made during
+compilation and represent them as branch instructions on special
+conditions.
+
+While this may appear similar in semantics to `undef`, it is very
+different in that an invocation produces a particular, singular
+value. It is also intended to be lowered late, and remain available
+for specific optimizations and transforms that can benefit from its
+special properties.
+
+Arguments:
+""""""""""
+
+None.
+
+Semantics:
+""""""""""
+
+The intrinsic ``@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()``
+returns either `true` or `false`. For each evaluation of a call
+to this intrinsic, the program must be valid and correct both if
+it returns `true` and if it returns `false`. This allows
+transformation passes to replace evaluations of this intrinsic
+with either value whenever one is beneficial.
+
+When used in a branch condition, it allows us to choose between
+two alternative correct solutions for the same problem, like
+in example below:
+
+.. code-block:: text
+
+    %cond = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+    br i1 %cond, label %solution_1, label %solution_2
+
+  label %fast_path:
+    ; Apply memory-consuming but fast solution for a task.
+
+  label %slow_path:
+    ; Cheap in memory but slow solution.
+
+Whether the result of intrinsic's call is `true` or `false`,
+it should be correct to pick either solution. We can switch
+between them by replacing the result of
+``@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition`` with different
+`i1` expressions.
+
+This is how it can be used to represent guards as widenable branches:
+
+.. code-block:: text
+
+  block:
+    ; Unguarded instructions
+    call void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond, <args...>) ["deopt"(<deopt_args...>)]
+    ; Guarded instructions
+
+Can be expressed in an alternative equivalent form of explicit branch using
+``@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition``:
+
+.. code-block:: text
+
+  block:
+    ; Unguarded instructions
+    %widenable_condition = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+    %guard_condition = and i1 %cond, %widenable_condition
+    br i1 %guard_condition, label %guarded, label %deopt
+
+  guarded:
+    ; Guarded instructions
+
+  deopt:
+    call type @llvm.experimental.deoptimize(<args...>) [ "deopt"(<deopt_args...>) ]
+
+So the block `guarded` is only reachable when `%cond` is `true`,
+and it should be valid to go to the block `deopt` whenever `%cond`
+is `true` or `false`.
+
+``@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition`` will never throw, thus
+it cannot be invoked.
+
+Guard widening:
+"""""""""""""""
+
+When ``@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()`` is used in
+condition of a guard represented as explicit branch, it is
+legal to widen the guard's condition with any additional
+conditions.
+
+Guard widening looks like replacement of
+
+.. code-block:: text
+
+  %widenable_cond = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+  %guard_cond = and i1 %cond, %widenable_cond
+  br i1 %guard_cond, label %guarded, label %deopt
+
+with
+
+.. code-block:: text
+
+  %widenable_cond = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+  %new_cond = and i1 %any_other_cond, %widenable_cond
+  %new_guard_cond = and i1 %cond, %new_cond
+  br i1 %new_guard_cond, label %guarded, label %deopt
+
+for this branch. Here `%any_other_cond` is an arbitrarily chosen
+well-defined `i1` value. By making guard widening, we may
+impose stricter conditions on `guarded` block and bail to the
+deopt when the new condition is not met.
+
+Lowering:
+"""""""""
+
+Default lowering strategy is replacing the result of
+call of ``@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition``  with
+constant `true`. However it is always correct to replace
+it with any other `i1` value. Any pass can
+freely do it if it can benefit from non-default lowering.
+
+
 '``llvm.load.relative``' Intrinsic
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 

include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.td

@@ -928,6 +928,10 @@ def int_experimental_deoptimize : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], [llvm_vararg_ty],
 def int_experimental_guard : Intrinsic<[], [llvm_i1_ty, llvm_vararg_ty],
                                        [Throws]>;
 
+// Supports widenable conditions for guards represented as explicit branches.
+def int_experimental_widenable_condition : Intrinsic<[llvm_i1_ty], [],
+                                           [IntrInaccessibleMemOnly]>;
+
 // NOP: calls/invokes to this intrinsic are removed by codegen
 def int_donothing : Intrinsic<[], [], [IntrNoMem]>;
 

include/llvm/InitializePasses.h

@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ void initializeExpandISelPseudosPass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeExpandMemCmpPassPass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeExpandPostRAPass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeExpandReductionsPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeMakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPassPass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeExternalAAWrapperPassPass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeFEntryInserterPass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeFinalizeMachineBundlesPass(PassRegistry&);

include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.h

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+//===-- MakeGuardsExplicit.h - Turn guard intrinsics into guard branches --===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This pass lowers the @llvm.experimental.guard intrinsic to the new form of
+// guard represented as widenable explicit branch to the deopt block. The
+// difference between this pass and LowerGuardIntrinsic is that after this pass
+// the guard represented as intrinsic:
+//
+//   call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %old_cond) [ "deopt"() ]
+//
+// transforms to a guard represented as widenable explicit branch:
+//
+//   %widenable_cond = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+//   br i1 (%old_cond & %widenable_cond), label %guarded, label %deopt
+//
+// Here:
+//   - The semantics of @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition allows to replace
+//     %widenable_cond with the construction (%widenable_cond & %any_other_cond)
+//     without loss of correctness;
+//   - %guarded is the lower part of old guard intrinsic's parent block split by
+//     the intrinsic call;
+//   - %deopt is a block containing a sole call to @llvm.experimental.deoptimize
+//     intrinsic.
+//
+// Therefore, this branch preserves the property of widenability.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+#ifndef LLVM_TRANSFORMS_SCALAR_MAKEGUARDSEXPLICIT_H
+#define LLVM_TRANSFORMS_SCALAR_MAKEGUARDSEXPLICIT_H
+
+#include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h"
+
+namespace llvm {
+
+struct MakeGuardsExplicitPass : public PassInfoMixin<MakeGuardsExplicitPass> {
+  PreservedAnalyses run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM);
+};
+
+} // namespace llvm
+
+#endif //LLVM_TRANSFORMS_SCALAR_MAKEGUARDSEXPLICIT_H

lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp

@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LowerAtomic.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LowerExpectIntrinsic.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LowerGuardIntrinsic.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/MemCpyOptimizer.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/MergedLoadStoreMotion.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/NaryReassociate.h"

lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def

@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ FUNCTION_PASS("dot-cfg-only", CFGOnlyPrinterPass())
 FUNCTION_PASS("early-cse", EarlyCSEPass(/*UseMemorySSA=*/false))
 FUNCTION_PASS("early-cse-memssa", EarlyCSEPass(/*UseMemorySSA=*/true))
 FUNCTION_PASS("ee-instrument", EntryExitInstrumenterPass(/*PostInlining=*/false))
+FUNCTION_PASS("make-guards-explicit", MakeGuardsExplicitPass())
 FUNCTION_PASS("post-inline-ee-instrument", EntryExitInstrumenterPass(/*PostInlining=*/true))
 FUNCTION_PASS("gvn-hoist", GVNHoistPass())
 FUNCTION_PASS("instcombine", InstCombinePass())

lib/Transforms/Scalar/CMakeLists.txt

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ add_llvm_library(LLVMScalarOpts
   LowerAtomic.cpp
   LowerExpectIntrinsic.cpp
   LowerGuardIntrinsic.cpp
+  MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp
   MemCpyOptimizer.cpp
   MergeICmps.cpp
   MergedLoadStoreMotion.cpp

lib/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+//===- MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp - Turn guard intrinsics into guard branches -===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This pass lowers the @llvm.experimental.guard intrinsic to the new form of
+// guard represented as widenable explicit branch to the deopt block. The
+// difference between this pass and LowerGuardIntrinsic is that after this pass
+// the guard represented as intrinsic:
+//
+//   call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %old_cond) [ "deopt"() ]
+//
+// transforms to a guard represented as widenable explicit branch:
+//
+//   %widenable_cond = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+//   br i1 (%old_cond & %widenable_cond), label %guarded, label %deopt
+//
+// Here:
+//   - The semantics of @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition allows to replace
+//     %widenable_cond with the construction (%widenable_cond & %any_other_cond)
+//     without loss of correctness;
+//   - %guarded is the lower part of old guard intrinsic's parent block split by
+//     the intrinsic call;
+//   - %deopt is a block containing a sole call to @llvm.experimental.deoptimize
+//     intrinsic.
+//
+// Therefore, this branch preserves the property of widenability.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/GuardUtils.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/InstIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/Pass.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/GuardUtils.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+namespace {
+struct MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass : public FunctionPass {
+  static char ID;
+  MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
+    initializeMakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
+  }
+
+  bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
+};
+}
+
+static void turnToExplicitForm(CallInst *Guard, Function *DeoptIntrinsic) {
+  // Replace the guard with an explicit branch (just like in GuardWidening).
+  BasicBlock *BB = Guard->getParent();
+  makeGuardControlFlowExplicit(DeoptIntrinsic, Guard);
+  BranchInst *ExplicitGuard = cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
+  assert(ExplicitGuard->isConditional() && "Must be!");
+
+  // We want the guard to be expressed as explicit control flow, but still be
+  // widenable. For that, we add Widenable Condition intrinsic call to the
+  // guard's condition.
+  IRBuilder<> B(ExplicitGuard);
+  auto *WidenableCondition =
+      B.CreateIntrinsic(Intrinsic::experimental_widenable_condition,
+                        {}, {}, nullptr, "widenable_cond");
+  WidenableCondition->setCallingConv(Guard->getCallingConv());
+  auto *NewCond =
+      B.CreateAnd(ExplicitGuard->getCondition(), WidenableCondition);
+  NewCond->setName("exiplicit_guard_cond");
+  ExplicitGuard->setCondition(NewCond);
+  Guard->eraseFromParent();
+}
+
+static bool explicifyGuards(Function &F) {
+  // Check if we can cheaply rule out the possibility of not having any work to
+  // do.
+  auto *GuardDecl = F.getParent()->getFunction(
+      Intrinsic::getName(Intrinsic::experimental_guard));
+  if (!GuardDecl || GuardDecl->use_empty())
+    return false;
+
+  SmallVector<CallInst *, 8> GuardIntrinsics;
+  for (auto &I : instructions(F))
+    if (isGuard(&I))
+      GuardIntrinsics.push_back(cast<CallInst>(&I));
+
+  if (GuardIntrinsics.empty())
+    return false;
+
+  auto *DeoptIntrinsic = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
+      F.getParent(), Intrinsic::experimental_deoptimize, {F.getReturnType()});
+  DeoptIntrinsic->setCallingConv(GuardDecl->getCallingConv());
+
+  for (auto *Guard : GuardIntrinsics)
+    turnToExplicitForm(Guard, DeoptIntrinsic);
+
+  return true;
+}
+
+bool MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
+  return explicifyGuards(F);
+}
+
+char MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass::ID = 0;
+INITIALIZE_PASS(MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass, "make-guards-explicit",
+                "Lower the guard intrinsic to explicit control flow form",
+                false, false)
+
+PreservedAnalyses MakeGuardsExplicitPass::run(Function &F,
+                                           FunctionAnalysisManager &) {
+  if (explicifyGuards(F))
+    return PreservedAnalyses::none();
+  return PreservedAnalyses::all();
+}

lib/Transforms/Scalar/Scalar.cpp

@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void llvm::initializeScalarOpts(PassRegistry &Registry) {
   initializeNewGVNLegacyPassPass(Registry);
   initializeEarlyCSELegacyPassPass(Registry);
   initializeEarlyCSEMemSSALegacyPassPass(Registry);
+  initializeMakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPassPass(Registry);
   initializeGVNHoistLegacyPassPass(Registry);
   initializeGVNSinkLegacyPassPass(Registry);
   initializeFlattenCFGPassPass(Registry);

test/Transforms/LICM/explicit_guards.ll

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -S -make-guards-explicit -basicaa -licm < %s        | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -S -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='require<opt-remark-emit>,make-guards-explicit,loop(licm)' < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Test interaction between explicit guards and LICM: make sure that we do not
+; hoist explicit conditions while we can hoist invariant loads in presence of
+; explicit guards.
+
+declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1,...)
+
+; Make sure that we do not hoist widenable_cond out of loop.
+define void @do_not_hoist_widenable_cond(i1 %cond, i32 %N, i32 %M) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @do_not_hoist_widenable_cond(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[GUARDED:%.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[GUARD_COND:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV]], [[N:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[GUARD_COND]], [[WIDENABLE_COND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND]], label [[GUARDED]], label [[DEOPT:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"() ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOOP_COND:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV]], [[M:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT]] = add i32 [[IV]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[LOOP]], label [[EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       exit:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+  %guard_cond = icmp slt i32 %iv, %N
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %guard_cond) [ "deopt"() ]
+  %loop_cond = icmp slt i32 %iv, %M
+  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
+  br i1 %loop_cond, label %loop, label %exit
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+define void @hoist_invariant_load(i1 %cond, i32* %np, i32 %M) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @hoist_invariant_load(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[N:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[NP:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[GUARDED:%.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[GUARD_COND:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV]], [[N]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[GUARD_COND]], [[WIDENABLE_COND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND]], label [[GUARDED]], label [[DEOPT:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"() ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOOP_COND:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV]], [[M:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT]] = add i32 [[IV]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[LOOP]], label [[EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       exit:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+  %N = load i32, i32* %np
+  %guard_cond = icmp slt i32 %iv, %N
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %guard_cond) [ "deopt"() ]
+  %loop_cond = icmp slt i32 %iv, %M
+  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
+  br i1 %loop_cond, label %loop, label %exit
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}

test/Transforms/MakeGuardsExplicit/basic.ll

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -S -make-guards-explicit < %s        | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -S -passes=make-guards-explicit < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1,...)
+
+; Check that a sole guard can be turned into explicit guards form.
+define void @trivial_guard(i1 %cond) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @trivial_guard(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND:%.*]], [[WIDENABLE_COND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND]], label [[GUARDED:%.*]], label [[DEOPT:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+entry:
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond) [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Check that a sequence of guards can be turned into explicit guards form.
+define void @trivial_guard_sequence(i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2, i1 %cond3) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @trivial_guard_sequence(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND1:%.*]], [[WIDENABLE_COND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND]], label [[GUARDED:%.*]], label [[DEOPT:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND3:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND4:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND2:%.*]], [[WIDENABLE_COND3]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND4]], label [[GUARDED1:%.*]], label [[DEOPT2:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 789, i64 123) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND7:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND8:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND3:%.*]], [[WIDENABLE_COND7]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND8]], label [[GUARDED5:%.*]], label [[DEOPT6:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt6:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 456, i64 789) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded5:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+entry:
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond1) [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond2) [ "deopt"(i32 789, i64 123) ]
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond3) [ "deopt"(i32 456, i64 789) ]
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Check that all instructions between the guards preserve.
+define void @split_block_contents(i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2, i1 %cond3, i32* %p) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @split_block_contents(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 0, i32* [[P:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND1:%.*]], [[WIDENABLE_COND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND]], label [[GUARDED:%.*]], label [[DEOPT:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 1, i32* [[P]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND3:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND4:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND2:%.*]], [[WIDENABLE_COND3]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND4]], label [[GUARDED1:%.*]], label [[DEOPT2:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 789, i64 123) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 2, i32* [[P]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND7:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND8:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND3:%.*]], [[WIDENABLE_COND7]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND8]], label [[GUARDED5:%.*]], label [[DEOPT6:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt6:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 456, i64 789) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded5:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 3, i32* [[P]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+entry:
+  store i32 0, i32* %p
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond1) [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+  store i32 1, i32* %p
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond2) [ "deopt"(i32 789, i64 123) ]
+  store i32 2, i32* %p
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond3) [ "deopt"(i32 456, i64 789) ]
+  store i32 3, i32* %p
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Check that the guard can split a loop properly.
+define void @split_loop(i1 %cond, i32 %N, i32 %M) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @split_loop(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[GUARDED:%.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[GUARD_COND:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV]], [[N:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[WIDENABLE_COND:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[GUARD_COND]], [[WIDENABLE_COND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND]], label [[GUARDED]], label [[DEOPT:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK:       deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.isVoid() [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+; CHECK:       guarded:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOOP_COND:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV]], [[M:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT]] = add i32 [[IV]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[LOOP]], label [[EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       exit:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+  %guard_cond = icmp slt i32 %iv, %N
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %guard_cond) [ "deopt"(i32 123, i64 456) ]
+  %loop_cond = icmp slt i32 %iv, %M
+  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
+  br i1 %loop_cond, label %loop, label %exit
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}