mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2025-02-01 05:01:59 +01:00
CGSCC should not treat intrinsic calls like function calls (PR21403)
Make the handling of calls to intrinsics in CGSCC consistent: they are not treated like regular function calls because they are never lowered to function calls. Without this patch, we can get dangling pointer asserts from the subsequent loop that processes callsites because it already ignores intrinsics. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21403 for more details / discussion. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6124 llvm-svn: 221802
This commit is contained in:
parent
1829598e82
commit
d88b37166d
@ -243,7 +243,14 @@ bool CGPassManager::RefreshCallGraph(CallGraphSCC &CurSCC,
|
||||
|
||||
assert(!CallSites.count(I->first) &&
|
||||
"Call site occurs in node multiple times");
|
||||
CallSites.insert(std::make_pair(I->first, I->second));
|
||||
|
||||
CallSite CS(I->first);
|
||||
if (CS) {
|
||||
Function *Callee = CS.getCalledFunction();
|
||||
// Ignore intrinsics because they're not really function calls.
|
||||
if (!Callee || !(Callee->isIntrinsic()))
|
||||
CallSites.insert(std::make_pair(I->first, I->second));
|
||||
}
|
||||
++I;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
19
test/Transforms/InstCombine/no_cgscc_assert.ll
Normal file
19
test/Transforms/InstCombine/no_cgscc_assert.ll
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
; RUN: opt < %s -inline -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; PR21403: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21403
|
||||
; When the call to sqrtf is replaced by an intrinsic call to fabs,
|
||||
; it should not cause a problem in CGSCC.
|
||||
|
||||
define float @bar(float %f) #0 {
|
||||
%mul = fmul fast float %f, %f
|
||||
%call1 = call float @sqrtf(float %mul) #0
|
||||
ret float %call1
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @bar(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: call float @llvm.fabs.f32
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret float
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
declare float @sqrtf(float) #0
|
||||
|
||||
attributes #0 = { readnone "unsafe-fp-math"="true" }
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user